Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

All discussions to do with the SANFL
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16858
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:32 am
Has thanked: 4014 times
Been thanked: 1840 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by another grub »

Jim05 wrote:
another grub wrote:They get shafted plain and simple. Anyone who doesnt think so is kidding themselves, but hey get the violins out!

Take off your SANFL blinkers and have a look.

Stats don't lie

Is it a measure to even up the comp? Have the umps been instructed to not give the 50/50 ones to ravens? Dont know?
Hopefully they are using it as a way to even up the comp and prevent a AFL side from winning the flag.

Worked in 2014 ;)
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16858
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:32 am
Has thanked: 4014 times
Been thanked: 1840 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by another grub »

Bag & Sledge wrote:
another grub wrote:Ravens' Worrell claims the umpires adjudicate the AFL listed players differently.

I remember thinking this several times last Sunday. They were clearly shafted and I believe the umpires have been instructed to make life 'difficult' for them.

Fire away with your thoughts?


Firstly, if he wants to bring up 'unfair treatment' then lets start with some comparisons..
AFL Reserves Full time professional footballers v SANFL part time semi-professional footballers?
AFL reserves teams have more money
AFL reserves teams have better facilities
AFL reserves teams have a lot more resources
Who is being treated unfairly again?

This is almost the last straw, it's time for the AFL Reserves teams to leave the SANFL.
They are not improving the competition, they have absolutely no supporter base and thats evident when just 2,000 people attended the Norwood v Adelaide Qualifying Final last week.

Lastly, if this was in the AFL would Worrell and Hayes cop a fine for their comments?


Not doubting their advantages. Just interesting that umpiring is arguably a way to even things up?????
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by RB »

I highly doubt that the SANFL is issuing special instructions to umpires for the cancers. That would require the SANFL hierarchy actually to give a toss about the competition.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
Posts: 9859
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:27 pm
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has thanked: 986 times
Been thanked: 1114 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by gadj1976 »

If he's so worried about the taunts, maybe he should get his club's 4000 people to turn up to even things out.
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:41 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by JK »

The idiocy of this is inferring crowd behaviour has to be manufactured in a way that allows the umpires to adjudicate more fairly. Give me a F***ing spell, how about the umpiring department enforce standards upon the decision makers rather than try to address crowd pressure which has existed for 100+ years?
FUSC
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16858
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:32 am
Has thanked: 4014 times
Been thanked: 1840 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by another grub »

No home cooking for the ravens thats for sure
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by RB »

gadj1976 wrote:If he's so worried about the taunts, maybe he should get his club's 4000 people to turn up to even things out.
Didn't Tex complain about the Ravens getting a spray from the crowd at Prospect in the early years of the occupation?

If Beryl and Mavis were ever going to rock up to support the Ravens, it would've been back then.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
User avatar
another grub
Coach
Posts: 16858
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:32 am
Has thanked: 4014 times
Been thanked: 1840 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by another grub »

Mavis had apricot slice to bake. Beryl had no excuses
mal wrote:I like to think of us as an allied team
sib
Rookie
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:59 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by sib »

Who are the Ravens that people keep talking about. I dont see a team call the ravens in the SANFL. Unlike Port the crows know who they are.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by Jim05 »

sib wrote:Who are the Ravens that people keep talking about. I dont see a team call the ravens in the SANFL. Unlike Port the crows know who they are.
The team for all South Australians that tried to wear the SA state guernsey in the SANFL?
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:06 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Flagstaff Hill
Has thanked: 519 times
Been thanked: 510 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by MatteeG »

Probably cos they train to AFL rules instead of SANFL rules....
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
mighty_tiger_79
Coach
Posts: 62502
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:59 pm
Team: Geelong
Location: at the TAB
Has thanked: 14201 times
Been thanked: 5170 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by mighty_tiger_79 »

Speed reading I thought title was Morrel
Matty Wade is a star and deserves more respect from the forum family!
gazzamagoo

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by gazzamagoo »

Stop giving frees away,
simples.
topshelf
Rookie
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:22 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by topshelf »

Haven't noticed it before but I did think the crows got a really bad run with the umps on Sunday. That happens though with all teams, sometimes good sometimes bad, I'd highly doubt it's on purpose.
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20240
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2497 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by DOC »

I think that a goodly percentage of the free kick disparity comes from the OOB last possession. They play wider than all other teams. I also feel that their "top up players" get caught with the ball a lot more. Comes down to poor coaching.

They should however not accept it and play in the VFL which naturally includes teams from Queensland and New South Wales which gives it an AFL reserves type of feel.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by am Bays »

Free kick count in the 2019 GF was Bays 31 Port 20
Free kick count in the 2019 Prelim was Bays 24 Adel 18... 8)

Based on what I quoted and the article re Worrell were Crows were -480 odd frees in their first six years (-80 a year) and Port -380 (-60 a year), they've both improved markedly in the last three years to by -17 and -58...

They should be thankful!!

If only their AFL sides could improve that much!!
Last edited by am Bays on Thu Sep 08, 2022 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by Jim05 »

How many of those frees are for the last touch rule?
The AFL sides still don’t understand the rule and often look bewildered when they concede a free from it.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by RB »

sib wrote:Who are the Ravens that people keep talking about. I dont see a team call the ravens in the SANFL. Unlike Port the crows know who they are.
I like it when fans of the 1991 franchise sh1t on the 1997 franchise, and vice versa. [emoji1787]
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by Jim05 »

What a shock that Triple Crow are having a sook about it
MW
Coach
Posts: 14197
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:25 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 2098 times
Contact:

Re: Worrell - AFL listed player umpire discrimination

Post by MW »

Jim05 wrote:What a shock that Triple Crow are having a sook about it


Funny how you know they will sook, but you listen anyway :lol:
You're just lucky you're not listening to Melbourne radio who would be shitting all over your rabble every day.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 308 guests