Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Jacquie hasn't messaged me

by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:36 pm
Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:45 pm
Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
by Pseudo » Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:49 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Jacquie hasn't messaged me
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:53 pm
Pseudo wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Jacquie hasn't messaged me
The Legalise Cannabis party hasn't messaged me yet. I guess they get my vote!
(on the unlikely assumption that I don't just deface the senate ballot with a monster cock)
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:56 pm
Voted on Monday and my artwork wasn’t great but it sort of looked like a phallus.Pseudo wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Jacquie hasn't messaged me
The Legalise Cannabis party hasn't messaged me yet. I guess they get my vote!
(on the unlikely assumption that I don't just deface the senate ballot with a monster cock)
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 30, 2025 2:00 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 3:37 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Just be thankful it was a text and not a voice message...
by gadj1976 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 4:24 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:I went the other day on my drive home, zero people in line. Haven't voted on polling day in eons, I'm always travelling interstate, if they bother to even ask.
Doodled a doodle on both voting papers.
by locky801 » Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:20 pm
Pseudo wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Jim05 wrote:I just got one from the Lambie network.
Thank **** this crap ends today
Jacquie hasn't messaged me
The Legalise Cannabis party hasn't messaged me yet. I guess they get my vote!
(on the unlikely assumption that I don't just deface the senate ballot with a monster cock)
by Corona Man » Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:23 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Thu May 01, 2025 7:49 am
Corona Man wrote:Heard on the radio a little earlier Clive Palmer defending his trumpet of flogs party sending of text messages. Comparing them to handing out how to vote cards at polling booths.
What a ******* ignoramus…. At a poling both I can politely decline a how to vote card you fat cnut.
by dedja » Thu May 01, 2025 9:21 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Corona Man wrote:Heard on the radio a little earlier Clive Palmer defending his trumpet of flogs party sending of text messages. Comparing them to handing out how to vote cards at polling booths.
What a ******* ignoramus…. At a poling both I can politely decline a how to vote card you fat cnut.
I wonder if anyone has ever voted for him, their adverts alone are enough to make you not vote for them.
by bertiebeatle1 » Thu May 01, 2025 9:54 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Corona Man wrote:Heard on the radio a little earlier Clive Palmer defending his trumpet of flogs party sending of text messages. Comparing them to handing out how to vote cards at polling booths.
What a ******* ignoramus…. At a poling both I can politely decline a how to vote card you fat cnut.
I wonder if anyone has ever voted for him, their adverts alone are enough to make you not vote for them.
by gadj1976 » Thu May 01, 2025 9:56 am
dedja wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Corona Man wrote:Heard on the radio a little earlier Clive Palmer defending his trumpet of flogs party sending of text messages. Comparing them to handing out how to vote cards at polling booths.
What a ******* ignoramus…. At a poling both I can politely decline a how to vote card you fat cnut.
I wonder if anyone has ever voted for him, their adverts alone are enough to make you not vote for them.
2022 Federal election - United Australia Party
House of Reps: 4.12% first preference votes, 0 seats
Senate: 3.46% first preference votes, 1 seat
That’s what $100M in pissing ads up the wall gets you.
by dedja » Thu May 01, 2025 10:08 am
gadj1976 wrote:dedja wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Corona Man wrote:Heard on the radio a little earlier Clive Palmer defending his trumpet of flogs party sending of text messages. Comparing them to handing out how to vote cards at polling booths.
What a ******* ignoramus…. At a poling both I can politely decline a how to vote card you fat cnut.
I wonder if anyone has ever voted for him, their adverts alone are enough to make you not vote for them.
2022 Federal election - United Australia Party
House of Reps: 4.12% first preference votes, 0 seats
Senate: 3.46% first preference votes, 1 seat
That’s what $100M in pissing ads up the wall gets you.
For him to get his money back, doesn't he need to get a certain percent?
by gadj1976 » Thu May 01, 2025 10:16 am
dedja wrote:
You need to get at least 4% of the first preference vote to receive $12,379 + $3.386 per vote.
UAP received 604,536 votes, so they would have received $2,059,337.90 in 2022 .. still a net loss of $98M
by whufc » Thu May 01, 2025 10:38 am
gadj1976 wrote:dedja wrote:
You need to get at least 4% of the first preference vote to receive $12,379 + $3.386 per vote.
UAP received 604,536 votes, so they would have received $2,059,337.90 in 2022 .. still a net loss of $98M
Ahh, I think if it's less than 4% you don't get any money. Some catch there somewhere. Either way, I wouldn't be losing nearly 100M every few years.
by dedja » Thu May 01, 2025 10:40 am
whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:dedja wrote:
You need to get at least 4% of the first preference vote to receive $12,379 + $3.386 per vote.
UAP received 604,536 votes, so they would have received $2,059,337.90 in 2022 .. still a net loss of $98M
Ahh, I think if it's less than 4% you don't get any money. Some catch there somewhere. Either way, I wouldn't be losing nearly 100M every few years.
Would it be a tax write off to reduce his income earnings whilst gaining a tiny bit of power.
by amber_fluid » Thu May 01, 2025 10:44 am
whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:dedja wrote:
You need to get at least 4% of the first preference vote to receive $12,379 + $3.386 per vote.
UAP received 604,536 votes, so they would have received $2,059,337.90 in 2022 .. still a net loss of $98M
Ahh, I think if it's less than 4% you don't get any money. Some catch there somewhere. Either way, I wouldn't be losing nearly 100M every few years.
Would it be a tax write off to reduce his income earnings whilst gaining a tiny bit of power.
by wenchbarwer » Thu May 01, 2025 10:49 am
amber_fluid wrote:whufc wrote:gadj1976 wrote:dedja wrote:
You need to get at least 4% of the first preference vote to receive $12,379 + $3.386 per vote.
UAP received 604,536 votes, so they would have received $2,059,337.90 in 2022 .. still a net loss of $98M
Ahh, I think if it's less than 4% you don't get any money. Some catch there somewhere. Either way, I wouldn't be losing nearly 100M every few years.
Would it be a tax write off to reduce his income earnings whilst gaining a tiny bit of power.
You gotta pay tax first
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |