Gingernuts wrote:Farmy wrote:After the game its said a statement is going to be made at selection, but when we actually get to selection none of the soft, effortless squibs get dropped. Perhaps others on the selection committee have hard ons for the "senior players". We're 1-7 ffs, season is shot, win-loss count doesn't matter. I'd rather lose and play young players of the future, than lose and play a bunch of old hasbeens.
Craig asked what the Crows side would look like without those players, well....The Crows are getting smashed now with them, what does it matter if we get smashed without. 1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
1-7
What a surprise that the Leadership group (Leaders in soft squib efforts) suspend 3 players, how convenient.
Ahem. Didn't Vince, Jaensch & Johncock all get dropped this week for their lack of commitment?? What more do you blokes want, seriously. So the messages you want to send are conditional are they??
I'd rather a team full of blokes with 100% commitment regardless of form than giving those spots to players who are half arsed and doesn't give a ****.
And dropping Porp?? I've heard it all now. Thank **** you blokes aren't running the club. I hope the boys have a big win on Sunday and stick it right up ya.
I actually hope the opposite GN, that we keep losing and some of the 'dead wood' supporters drop off...