Who should be the most embarrassed?

Talk on the national game

Who should be the most embarrassed

Geelong
1
2%
Hawthorn
4
9%
Western Bulldogs
13
28%
Port
28
61%
 
Total votes : 46

Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Rik E Boy » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:28 pm

There was some truly horrible football played over the last three days with some teams having enough egg on their faces to fry up a rather large omlette. So who gets the gong for most embarrassing loss for the round? The nominees are...

Geelong
The Cats looked like yesterdays men on Friday night losing their first match to the Blues since 2004. The turnovers and lack of run was most alarming as the wheels well and truly fell off. Bomber Thompson called this match an 'unGeelong like performance' but I reckon he hasn't been watching for the last five weeks.

Western Bulldogs
The Bullies have become the Eagles first roadkill in 19 matches after at one stage having the rather embarrassing score of 0.10 to their name. To have their pants pulled down by the Eagles kids three weeks out from the finals must be causing Rodney Eade to lose his hair..oh wait, too late!

Hawthorn
People have quite rightly praised the Saints for their efforts in Tassie but the Hawks sucked hard against a side that had more holes in it than Royal Adelaide. The Hawks didn't ever look like it in a match where they had reportedly been prepared to 'make a statement'. I reckon Clarko might have cashed in on the Sainters.

Port Power
Why oh why didn't we listen to NO MERCY? The Power deserve a special mention losing at Subi twice this year. Imagine losing to the primary school boys in their most important match of the year? Ladies and gentlemen I believe we have a winner.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28588
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby GWW » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:35 pm

Well with PORT ADELAIDE it wasn't unexpected, pathetic interstate performances come with the territory. The Geelong Cats would have higher expectations than losing to a team with 7 or so players out, so perhaps it is the Geelong Cats. I would say the Bulldogs though.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Thiele » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:40 pm

Port Power
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Turbo » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:43 pm

GWW wrote:Well with PORT ADELAIDE it wasn't unexpected, pathetic interstate performances come with the territory. The Geelong Cats would have higher expectations than losing to a team with 7 or so players out, so perhaps it is the Geelong Cats. I would say the Bulldogs though.


I disagree. Port's finals spot is on the line and they were hopeless. They don't deserve to be there
User avatar
Turbo
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 2687
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Lygon Street - The Holy Land
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 38 times
Grassroots Team: Cove

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby wycbloods » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:47 pm

GWW wrote:Well with PORT ADELAIDE it wasn't unexpected, pathetic interstate performances come with the territory. The Geelong Cats would have higher expectations than losing to a team with 7 or so players out, so perhaps it is the Geelong Cats. I would say the Bulldogs though.


Did carlton have 7 players out?????????
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Dr. Rev. Martin Luther King Jnr.

CoverKing said what?

Agree with AF on this one!
wycbloods
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7006
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:41 am
Location: WYC or Westies
Has liked: 13 times
Been liked: 20 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Dirko » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:53 pm

wycbloods wrote:Did carlton have 7 players out?????????


We had a few out but shhhh, don't tell anyone ;)

I think this thread sucks though and doesn't give enough credit to the 4 teams that won......
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby GWW » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:56 pm

wycbloods wrote:
GWW wrote:Well with PORT ADELAIDE it wasn't unexpected, pathetic interstate performances come with the territory. The Geelong Cats would have higher expectations than losing to a team with 7 or so players out, so perhaps it is the Geelong Cats. I would say the Bulldogs though.


Did carlton have 7 players out?????????


Apologies, my error, was mixing up Geelong with Hawthorn there.

My point remains though that Port losing wasn't a surprise at all. I didn't expect them to win. Hawthorn are reigning premiers and played a depleted St Kilda, more would have been expected. Similar with the Bulldogs. I know its easy to bash Port Adelaide and the club's supporters do it enough, the fact is the team just isn't that good so performances like today's aren't unexpected.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15681
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:39 pm

GWW wrote:Hawthorn are reigning premiers and played a depleted St Kilda, more would have been expected.


Correction. This year's undefeated team St.Kilda who are very well drilled and have the depth to cover good players for one week (players trying to impress for a spot in the team for the finals) played last years premier Hawthorn, who have been playing ordinary footy all season, also with players out. Anyone who assumed the Hawks would win, and backed them, deserved to lose their money.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Booney » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:45 am

As toss up between the Bulldogs and anyone who thought Port could win two in a row.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61743
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8218 times
Been liked: 11948 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby JK » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:15 am

Dogs ... For a team that all season has set themselves for Top 4 and (what they believe to be) a legitimate chance for the Premiership, they shouldn't lose a game like that.

No disrespect to the Eagles intended.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Q. » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:36 pm

Dogs were DOOMED! Hehehe...
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Bully » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:52 pm

my vote is port power
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby NFC » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:18 pm

Port were pathetic, a joke, uncommitted.

However I gave it to Bulldogs because West Coast away from home are= :lol:

How could they lost to them at the Dome?
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby westozfalcon » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:10 pm

The Hawks get my vote.

With their finals aspirations at stake you'd have expected the reigning premiers to take advantage of a hugely depleted St Kilda lineup down in Tassie.
westozfalcon
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:30 pm
Location: Perth WA
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Dirko » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:11 pm

westozfalcon wrote:The Hawks get my vote.

With their finals aspirations at stake you'd have expected the reigning premiers to take advantage of a hugely depleted St Kilda lineup down in Tassie.


Why ? How many were the Hawks missing ?
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Dutchy » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:12 pm

Where have the Bullies played their last 5 games? :-k :-k :-k :-k
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46256
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2649 times
Been liked: 4316 times

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby the wonder elephant » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:22 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:There was some truly horrible football played over the last three days with some teams having enough egg on their faces to fry up a rather large omlette. So who gets the gong for most embarrassing loss for the round? The nominees are...

Geelong
The Cats looked like yesterdays men on Friday night losing their first match to the Blues since 2004. The turnovers and lack of run was most alarming as the wheels well and truly fell off. Bomber Thompson called this match an 'unGeelong like performance' but I reckon he hasn't been watching for the last five weeks.

Western Bulldogs
The Bullies have become the Eagles first roadkill in 19 matches after at one stage having the rather embarrassing score of 0.10 to their name. To have their pants pulled down by the Eagles kids three weeks out from the finals must be causing Rodney Eade to lose his hair..oh wait, too late!

Hawthorn
People have quite rightly praised the Saints for their efforts in Tassie but the Hawks sucked hard against a side that had more holes in it than Royal Adelaide. The Hawks didn't ever look like it in a match where they had reportedly been prepared to 'make a statement'. I reckon Clarko might have cashed in on the Sainters.

Port Power
Why oh why didn't we listen to NO MERCY? The Power deserve a special mention losing at Subi twice this year. Imagine losing to the primary school boys in their most important match of the year? Ladies and gentlemen I believe we have a winner.

regards,

REB

port with a spot in the 8 on the line for me :shock: BUT
the wonder elephants in the hogg shield were a close 2nd :oops: :oops:
858
the wonder elephant
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2118
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:25 pm
Location: the zoo
Has liked: 114 times
Been liked: 18 times
Grassroots Team: Ironbank

Re: Who should be the most embarrassed?

Postby Bat Pad » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:53 am

Not sure if anyone has mentioned it but Richmond should be pretty embarrased. Cousins 250th, MCG and Sydney not in fantastic form lately, bar a good showing last week, would have thought the Tigers would have at least given more of a yelp.
Bat Pad
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1017
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:03 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time


Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |