jointman wrote:Thiele wrote:jointman wrote:wheres it played?
Subi
shouldn't freo be named 1st
that better Joint


by the joker » Wed Aug 05, 2009 9:42 pm
jointman wrote:Thiele wrote:jointman wrote:wheres it played?
Subi
shouldn't freo be named 1st
by McAlmanac » Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:08 pm
hondo71 wrote:McAlmanac wrote:hondo71 wrote:Port play well over there and Freo have an injury list as long as the phone book
Port by 37 points
How did Port go against West Coast at Subi this year?
Lost by 50 points
2008 v WC won by 24 points
2008 v Freo won by 28 points
2007 v Freo won by 16 points
2006 v Freo lost by 79 points
2005 v Freo lost by 35 points
2005 v WC lost by 117 points
2004 v WC won by 3 points
2004 v Freo won by 10 points
So that's 5-4 at Subiaco since 2004 with a couple of bad losses. It's a pretty good record. It's not brilliant. I think the ground suits their running style game plan and they play well there, most times. Not last time ...
by Hondo » Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:29 am
by Thiele » Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:50 pm
by auto » Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:24 pm
by Thiele » Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:35 pm
by overloaded » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:01 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by dedja » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:06 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:10 pm
by Hondo » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:28 pm
hondo71 wrote:Port play well over there and Freo have an injury list as long as the phone book
Port by 37 points
by night raver » Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:35 pm
by McAlmanac » Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:44 pm
by Magpiespower » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:02 am
by Booney » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:46 am
by Zelezny Chucks » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:42 pm
Booney wrote:It is laughable that we can still play finals.
Shame on the 8 teams below us.
by Booney » Mon Aug 10, 2009 2:46 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:17 pm
Booney wrote:WTF? Their lists aren't on the cusp of playing Finals....PORT ARE!
Why you ask? Because we are inconsistent and mediocre at very best and there are 8 teams below us. Im not talking about 2010 or 2011 FFS, Im talking about the next 3 weeks of season 2009.
Either your team is one of those 8 below Port and you dont fell willing to have them in your profile or your team is above Port and you're just stirring.
by Booney » Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:20 pm
by Gingernuts » Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:29 pm
Booney wrote:NB : Those who touted Port as a top 4 side were wrong.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |