by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:35 pm
by JK » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:39 pm
NFC wrote:Absolute dirty scum bag of a player. Has no skills, is in the competition because of his thuggery. The sooner someone takes him out the better.
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:42 pm
by JK » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:46 pm
NFC wrote:I'm biased by his SANFL allegiance too but I still cannot stand him as a player. He happens to play in arguably the softest team in the league and for that reason he gets a game, if he was on any other clubs list I doubt he'd get a regular game.
The bump on Ellis today? The punch on someone who I can't quite remember, hopefully it's looked at, the wrestle where he had no reason to be involved but he came from nowhere just to insert his authority. Average skills, average pace, just in the side because of his dirty tactics.
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:52 pm
by GWW » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:54 pm
by JK » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:00 pm
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:02 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:I guess I just think Tommy plays unsociable footy, not a lot different to the Hawks last year ... Sometimes that can lead to crossing the line, but Ive never seen him belt anyone.
I have a few mates who follow the Crows who can't stand him because of the Hentschel and Bassett incidences, both of which I thought were unfortunate but not acts of thuggery (although I'll admit I seem to be in the minority there)
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:04 pm
GWW wrote:Yeah dirty mongrel, if only he'd do the soft things like elbow a full back in the jaw as per Bickley and Wakelin.
This thread is actually laughable.
by GWW » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:06 pm
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:08 pm
GWW wrote:So every clash on a footy field (one's where there no suspension) deserves a thread. Hmm..
by jackpot jim » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:09 pm
NFC wrote:Ellis was pretty much just standing the mark, aren't you allowed to do that these days without expecting to be cleaned up? It was identical to the Dawson hit on Symes and he got 2 weeks.
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:12 pm
jackpot jim wrote:NFC wrote:Ellis was pretty much just standing the mark, aren't you allowed to do that these days without expecting to be cleaned up? It was identical to the Dawson hit on Symes and he got 2 weeks.
If that is the incident i'm thinking of, Didn't the umpire call play on and Thomas applied a legal shephard, Whats wrong with that?
by jackpot jim » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:22 pm
NFC wrote:jackpot jim wrote:NFC wrote:Ellis was pretty much just standing the mark, aren't you allowed to do that these days without expecting to be cleaned up? It was identical to the Dawson hit on Symes and he got 2 weeks.
If that is the incident i'm thinking of, Didn't the umpire call play on and Thomas applied a legal shephard, Whats wrong with that?
Umpire was very close to blowing his whistle, you could see him thinking about it.
Symes wasn't rewarded a free kick either, yet Dawson got 2 weeks. That was legal too?
by auto » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:40 pm
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:44 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Maybe you need to watch the game a bit closer. Thomas plays tough and hard. "Thuggery" implies he goes around handing out cheap shots and behind the play incidents...Wrong. He gives out the hard stuff, and takes it and plays the game in a fair manner. Get over your crows season ticket holder bias and boooo people for a genuine reason.
by auto » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:53 pm
by NFC » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:05 pm
automaticwicky wrote:Theres a difference between hardness and thuggery. Look it up because youve got no idea at present
by am Bays » Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:17 pm
by Courtney Fish » Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:13 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |