locky801 wrote:Were South unlucky or Norwood lucky
Norwood kicked 1 more point than South over 100 minutes of footy. Luck has nothing to do with it.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:29 pm
locky801 wrote:Were South unlucky or Norwood lucky
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:45 pm
eaglehaslanded wrote:I bet the Norwood coaching staff have them doing some goalkicking practice during the week.
by SABRE » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:33 pm
SnappyTom wrote:"one swallow doesn't make a summer"...
ST...
by blueandwhite » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:45 pm
by phantom57 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:49 pm
by Sojourner » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:27 pm
by JK » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:29 pm
Sojourner wrote:How do Norwood fans feel having to admit that their coach handed out a lesson today from the coaching box in how to coach at SANFL level?????????
by Sojourner » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:31 pm
by southee » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:35 pm
Sojourner wrote:Old school attacking football in the last 1/4 blew the Panthers out of the water. Clay went to ground and went defensive and Trevor showed him how its done......
by scott » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:43 pm
by Jars458 » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:06 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:locky801 wrote:Were South unlucky or Norwood lucky
Norwood kicked 1 more point than South over 100 minutes of footy. Luck has nothing to do with it.
by spell_check » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:07 am
Jars458 wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:locky801 wrote:Were South unlucky or Norwood lucky
Norwood kicked 1 more point than South over 100 minutes of footy. Luck has nothing to do with it.
Luck or chance can do a fair bit over 100 minutes of footy. Not saying it did in this game but your confidence that there was no luck involved is a bit rich. Perhaps an umpire was unsighted by a segull in his direct line of vision and missed a free in front of goal. That would not count as luck?
by prowling panther » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:21 am
Jars458 wrote:Luck's a fortune
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:24 am
subpol wrote:Jars458 wrote:Luck's a fortune
How much of a fortune does 'Luck' cost?
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:24 am
Jars458 wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:locky801 wrote:Were South unlucky or Norwood lucky
Norwood kicked 1 more point than South over 100 minutes of footy. Luck has nothing to do with it.
Luck or chance can do a fair bit over 100 minutes of footy. Not saying it did in this game but your confidence that there was no luck involved is a bit rich. Perhaps an umpire was unsighted by a segull in his direct line of vision and missed a free in front of goal. That would not count as luck?
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:27 am
by SABRE » Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:57 am
phantom57 wrote:this is the reason why Norwood are the only team in the league that begin with the letter "f"......?
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jun 14, 2009 9:26 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Norwood would of been UNLUCKY to have 30 to 19 scoring shots and lose.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:18 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:Norwood would of been UNLUCKY to have 30 to 19 scoring shots and lose.
No, that would have been bad football, not bad luck.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |