by magpie in the 80's » Sun May 03, 2009 5:28 pm
by The Apostle » Sun May 03, 2009 5:36 pm
LBT wrote:I know you'd love to beat port in a grand final, but i cant see that happening this year
by FlyingHigh » Sun May 03, 2009 5:38 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:LBT wrote:I know you'd love to beat port in a grand final, but i cant see that happening this year
I know you'd love to beat Centrals in a grand final, but i cant see that happening this year...
by LBT » Sun May 03, 2009 5:58 pm
magpie in the 80's wrote:Panthers 11.9.75
Bays 14.17.101
Goals Glenelg: Hall.
by stampy » Sun May 03, 2009 6:00 pm
by Dutchy » Sun May 03, 2009 7:17 pm
by am Bays » Sun May 03, 2009 7:22 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:Have to lose four GF's to have any respect these days, not these one-year-wonder types
by spell_check » Sun May 03, 2009 7:24 pm
am Bays wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Have to lose four GF's to have any respect these days, not these one-year-wonder types
Bookmark this one SAFootyers, Glenelg being criticised for NOT losing enough Grand Finals!!!!
Who'd a thunk it??
by whufc » Sun May 03, 2009 7:49 pm
by gerling182 » Sun May 03, 2009 7:51 pm
by FlyingHigh » Sun May 03, 2009 8:20 pm
am Bays wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:Have to lose four GF's to have any respect these days, not these one-year-wonder types
Bookmark this one SAFootyers, Glenelg being criticised for NOT losing enough Grand Finals!!!!
Who'd a thunk it??
by stampy » Sun May 03, 2009 9:20 pm
gerling182 wrote:135 more disposals and a heap more inside 50 entries, it's fair to say the Bays were easily the best side out there, but far too inclined to handball under pressure, if you turn it over you might as well stick it on the boot and turn it over 50 metres further away from your goals. Carr and Fisher were ball magnets, Backwell worked into the game as it wore on and put his stamp on the game and Grima was fantastic crashing the packs (taking out Torney on one occasion!) and kicking 3 goals, 2 coming in the last quarter when the game was on the line.
For South fans at least you hung in there despire being outplayed, Boyd was good but when Sandery is your second biggest possesion winner deep in defence you've got some problems. At least you only play Port next week!
by saintal » Sun May 03, 2009 9:38 pm
by prowling panther » Sun May 03, 2009 9:40 pm
gerling182 wrote:135 more disposals and a heap more inside 50 entries, it's fair to say the Bays were easily
by Dirko » Sun May 03, 2009 9:44 pm
saintal wrote:On the plus side a few of us gave Chri$ Hall a nice welcoming home.
by prowling panther » Sun May 03, 2009 9:51 pm
SJABC wrote:saintal wrote:On the plus side a few of us gave Chri$ Hall a nice welcoming home.
You did ? Struth didn't hear anything, however when he kicked that lovely goal the roar was bloody loud
by Dirko » Sun May 03, 2009 9:57 pm
subpol wrote:Probably 'cos you had tiger poo in your ears.![]()
![]()
by bay_girl23 » Sun May 03, 2009 10:03 pm
stampy wrote: the umpires for most of the match were deplorable - dont know whats happened there
by prowling panther » Sun May 03, 2009 10:05 pm
SJABC wrote:subpol wrote:Probably 'cos you had tiger poo in your ears.![]()
![]()
Have you been to the Dave Flanagan school of comedy by chance ?
by Dirko » Sun May 03, 2009 10:19 pm
subpol wrote:Someone has to write his stuff, do you go and watch him in your spare time?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |