by Psyber » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:46 am
by NO-MERCY » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:05 pm
Barto wrote:Give him a contract that takes him through until 2029.
by Il Duce » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:28 pm
Felch wrote:The only person who ever says Mark Williams is going to coach elsewhere is Mark Williams.
Would Collingwood or Essendon actually want him ?
Before i get jumped all over, im not faulting his actual coaching record (which is outstanding), but FFS, does he have to keep reinforcing the fact he is a tool.
Why would you even be mentioning on national TV that you might like to coach elsewhere one day, especially in light of recent happenings ?
by GWW » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:30 pm
wharf side crew wrote:Felch wrote:The only person who ever says Mark Williams is going to coach elsewhere is Mark Williams.
Would Collingwood or Essendon actually want him ?
Before i get jumped all over, im not faulting his actual coaching record (which is outstanding), but FFS, does he have to keep reinforcing the fact he is a tool.
Why would you even be mentioning on national TV that you might like to coach elsewhere one day, especially in light of recent happenings ?
Anything is better than Matthew Knights
by Il Duce » Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:37 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:17 am
by Il Duce » Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:23 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:You've got a young side clown what do you & alot of your inpatient supporters expect success in 1 year?
Take Hawthorn & A Clarkson for example, no one really wanted him at Hawthorn yet it was only Dunstalls idea of taking someone with new ideas outside of the club that was then supported by the rest of the board.
He gave it a 4-5 year plan & what happened? A flag in 4 years.
People like you that know f..k all about the game should shut the hell up & stop embarrassing the people that support your great club & run it.
Give the bloke 5 years, remember in the 25 odd years that Sheedy coached he averaged 1 flag every 5 years.
by Rik E Boy » Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:56 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:You've got a young side clown what do you & alot of your inpatient supporters expect success in 1 year?
Take Hawthorn & A Clarkson for example, no one really wanted him at Hawthorn yet it was only Dunstalls idea of taking someone with new ideas outside of the club that was then supported by the rest of the board.
He gave it a 4-5 year plan & what happened? A flag in 4 years.
People like you that know f..k all about the game should shut the hell up & stop embarrassing the people that support your great club & run it.
Give the bloke 5 years, remember in the 25 odd years that Sheedy coached he averaged 1 flag every 5 years.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:22 am
NO-MERCY wrote::roll:
by Magpiespower » Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:42 am
wharf side crew wrote: I couldn't belive we didn't pick Hardwick.
by Barto » Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:11 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Give him a contract that takes him through until 2029.
O'H PLEASE!
by GWW » Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:51 pm
Barto wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Barto wrote:Give him a contract that takes him through until 2029.
O'H PLEASE!
It'd be heaven sent for non Port people.
by ORDoubleBlues » Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:04 pm
wharf side crew wrote:Yeah dont remind me. I was sorry angry.I couldn't belive we didn't pick Hardwick.
by NO-MERCY » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:34 pm
ORDoubleBlues wrote:wharf side crew wrote:Yeah dont remind me. I was sorry angry.I couldn't belive we didn't pick Hardwick.
May have already been mentioned but apparently during the interview process Hardwick told the Essendon board that he believed it would be a 2 year process to return to the top 8 whereas Knights told them it could be done straight away and as we know that didn't happen and almost certainly won't happen this year either.
On subject though, think that Port should stitch Williams up on a 3 year or longer deal because IMHO Port Adelaide is a unique situation that needs someone like Williams at the helm - you certainly wouldn't want to replace him with a Peter Sumich or a Wayne Campbell etc if you were to set chocco free.
by ORDoubleBlues » Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:46 am
NO-MERCY wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:wharf side crew wrote:Yeah dont remind me. I was sorry angry.I couldn't belive we didn't pick Hardwick.
May have already been mentioned but apparently during the interview process Hardwick told the Essendon board that he believed it would be a 2 year process to return to the top 8 whereas Knights told them it could be done straight away and as we know that didn't happen and almost certainly won't happen this year either.
On subject though, think that Port should stitch Williams up on a 3 year or longer deal because IMHO Port Adelaide is a unique situation that needs someone like Williams at the helm - you certainly wouldn't want to replace him with a Peter Sumich or a Wayne Campbell etc if you were to set chocco free.
What an absolute load of bullsh!t, & you think Essendon would pick a coach based on that assesment.
Wheres your brain clown?
by Rotter » Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:27 am
Merc it is a well known fact in certain circles in Melbourne that Hardwick had an excellent presentation and yet was scathing in his assessment of the Essendon List during the interview process and warned them there would be a lot more pain before joy and an assessment that has been supported by others where Knights went in with a softly softly "we be ok" sell. Of course there were other factors such as presentations and the like but he very much played down the perception of their list. This isn't rumour merc this was from an executive on the board who quit in protest of Knights appointment.NO-MERCY wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:wharf side crew wrote:Yeah dont remind me. I was sorry angry.I couldn't belive we didn't pick Hardwick.
May have already been mentioned but apparently during the interview process Hardwick told the Essendon board that he believed it would be a 2 year process to return to the top 8 whereas Knights told them it could be done straight away and as we know that didn't happen and almost certainly won't happen this year either.
On subject though, think that Port should stitch Williams up on a 3 year or longer deal because IMHO Port Adelaide is a unique situation that needs someone like Williams at the helm - you certainly wouldn't want to replace him with a Peter Sumich or a Wayne Campbell etc if you were to set chocco free.
What an absolute load of bullsh!t, & you think Essendon would pick a coach based on that assesment.
Wheres your brain clown?
by NO-MERCY » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:08 pm
by Rotter » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:10 pm
They may well have but will Williams be at Port next yearNO-MERCY wrote:Essendon have the right man at the helm regardless .
by Ruben Carter » Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:20 pm
Rotter wrote:They may well have but will Williams be at Port next yearNO-MERCY wrote:Essendon have the right man at the helm regardless .
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |