by DOC » Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:34 pm
by G » Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:04 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:50 am
G wrote:Dont wish an injury on anyone but the retirement part - please please be true !!!!!!!!!!
by bayman » Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:07 am
by UK Fan » Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:20 am
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by wycbloods » Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:29 pm
UK Fan wrote:So that is Clark Burford Mallard Obrien and Ward that have left after signing on only last year.
Surely a question of depth for North Adelaide this year.
by Dutchy » Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:08 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:20 pm
UK Fan wrote:So that is Clark Burford Mallard Obrien and Ward that have left after signing on only last year.
Surely a question of depth for North Adelaide this year.
by G » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:09 pm
by am Bays » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:06 am
by Ronnie » Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:39 am
by Big Phil » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:38 pm
by bayman » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:57 pm
by JK » Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:00 pm
bayman wrote:it'll free up the salary cap a bit more, i think if he's gone back to victoria because of a pub, it is very disrespectful to north adelaide
by bayman » Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:07 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:bayman wrote:it'll free up the salary cap a bit more, i think if he's gone back to victoria because of a pub, it is very disrespectful to north adelaide
Forget the fact that it's a pub, it's understandable if anyone gives away their sport career to pursue a business interest that they believe will ultimately be of greater benefit to them.
by JK » Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:11 pm
bayman wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:bayman wrote:it'll free up the salary cap a bit more, i think if he's gone back to victoria because of a pub, it is very disrespectful to north adelaide
Forget the fact that it's a pub, it's understandable if anyone gives away their sport career to pursue a business interest that they believe will ultimately be of greater benefit to them.
i understand what your saying cp but i'm 'old school' & to me he has/had a commitment & should honour it, lets face it the pub will still be there sept/oct when he could then move to victoria after honouring his obligations, however i'll grant you a club could sack a player but that player would get all payments owing
by Wedgie » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:23 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:20 am
by rod_rooster » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:40 am
by wycbloods » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:08 am
Dutchy wrote:Also find it strange that just cause someone owns a pub that they need to be in the same state as it?
When did you last see the owner working the pub?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |