Punk Rooster wrote:In the words of Barry McKenzie- "You're boring the strides off of me..."
Just putting some common sense into the debate

by GWW » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:43 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:In the words of Barry McKenzie- "You're boring the strides off of me..."
by rod_rooster » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:49 pm
GWW wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Port Adelaide- LOWEST SCORE IN A GF!
So hypothetically if Port's opposition kicked 1.7 that day to Port's 1.6 (100 years ago!!), that wouldn't be taken into consideration?? What a joke.....lets look at all relative things, the fact that its 100 years ago, obviously the level of scoring back then was considerably less than it is now or in 89......you North supporters cant deny it but the 1989 Grand Final is the by far........
THE MOST EMBARASSING EFFORT IN A GRAND FINAL AS FAR AS EVERY LIVING SANFL
SUPPORTER WOULD BE CONCERNED (well apart form the North supporters who are in denial
and like to talk about a game 100 years ago)!!!!!!!!!!
The Eagles may have lost by over 20 goals a couple of years ago, but for North to kick 1 goal in a GF (yes in 1989 well within our lifetimes), in fine conditions, when the opposition kicked over 15...........oh but thats right North only had "one goal in mind" didnt they. I remember after the game Nunan said, "well we only had one goal in mind.....and plus Port kicked 1 goal in a GF in 1905 so taking that into consideration its been a pretty good day for the club today.."
by - » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:57 pm
rod_rooster wrote:GWW wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Port Adelaide- LOWEST SCORE IN A GF!
So hypothetically if Port's opposition kicked 1.7 that day to Port's 1.6 (100 years ago!!), that wouldn't be taken into consideration?? What a joke.....lets look at all relative things, the fact that its 100 years ago, obviously the level of scoring back then was considerably less than it is now or in 89......you North supporters cant deny it but the 1989 Grand Final is the by far........
THE MOST EMBARASSING EFFORT IN A GRAND FINAL AS FAR AS EVERY LIVING SANFL
SUPPORTER WOULD BE CONCERNED (well apart form the North supporters who are in denial
and like to talk about a game 100 years ago)!!!!!!!!!!
The Eagles may have lost by over 20 goals a couple of years ago, but for North to kick 1 goal in a GF (yes in 1989 well within our lifetimes), in fine conditions, when the opposition kicked over 15...........oh but thats right North only had "one goal in mind" didnt they. I remember after the game Nunan said, "well we only had one goal in mind.....and plus Port kicked 1 goal in a GF in 1905 so taking that into consideration its been a pretty good day for the club today.."
We might have only kicked 1 goal in 89 but i still think losing by over 20 goals in a GF is worse. North only let Port kick 13.
by Leaping Lindner » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:09 pm
GWW wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Port Adelaide- LOWEST SCORE IN A GF!
So hypothetically if Port's opposition kicked 1.7 that day to Port's 1.6 (100 years ago!!), that wouldn't be taken into consideration?? What a joke.....lets look at all relative things, the fact that its 100 years ago, obviously the level of scoring back then was considerably less than it is now or in 89......you North supporters cant deny it but the 1989 Grand Final is the by far........
THE MOST EMBARASSING EFFORT IN A GRAND FINAL AS FAR AS EVERY LIVING SANFL
SUPPORTER WOULD BE CONCERNED (well apart form the North supporters who are in denial
and like to talk about a game 100 years ago)!!!!!!!!!!
The Eagles may have lost by over 20 goals a couple of years ago, but for North to kick 1 goal in a GF (yes in 1989 well within our lifetimes), in fine conditions, when the opposition kicked over 15...........oh but thats right North only had "one goal in mind" didnt they. I remember after the game Nunan said, "well we only had one goal in mind.....and plus Port kicked 1 goal in a GF in 1905 so taking that into consideration its been a pretty good day for the club today.."
by GWW » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:27 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:GWW wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Port Adelaide- LOWEST SCORE IN A GF!
So hypothetically if Port's opposition kicked 1.7 that day to Port's 1.6 (100 years ago!!), that wouldn't be taken into consideration?? What a joke.....lets look at all relative things, the fact that its 100 years ago, obviously the level of scoring back then was considerably less than it is now or in 89......you North supporters cant deny it but the 1989 Grand Final is the by far........
THE MOST EMBARASSING EFFORT IN A GRAND FINAL AS FAR AS EVERY LIVING SANFL
SUPPORTER WOULD BE CONCERNED (well apart form the North supporters who are in denial
and like to talk about a game 100 years ago)!!!!!!!!!!
The Eagles may have lost by over 20 goals a couple of years ago, but for North to kick 1 goal in a GF (yes in 1989 well within our lifetimes), in fine conditions, when the opposition kicked over 15...........oh but thats right North only had "one goal in mind" didnt they. I remember after the game Nunan said, "well we only had one goal in mind.....and plus Port kicked 1 goal in a GF in 1905 so taking that into consideration its been a pretty good day for the club today.."
Just curious can you find the actual source for this quote as I seriously don't believe this. Also if you reckon it was fine conditions that day you weren't there. The wind changed direction at will and there were intermittent showers and drizzle all day.
by Sam_goUUUdogs » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:31 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Blue Boy wrote:Good laugh that one Punky !!!!
I dont think you can claim the last one though !!!!
We look a red hot chance to break Central's run...
by raymond » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:46 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:And guess who is going to put an end to Central's dominance?
...........
most teams eventually win one, but only a few dominate
West Whyalla
by drebin » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:52 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Valleysvirgin wrote:I could probably supply Punky with enough material for around 46 stanzas of a Glenelg one drebin however at least we did not appoint Darel Hart even once although he has applied.
Hart isn't our biggest failure as coach, that honour belongs to Chris McDermott...a Glenelg "ledgend"...
Wouldn't be bring up Coaching appointments if I was you, VV, as Glenelg has an outstanding record in that department.
Well there is One thing all North fans should thank Bones for is that if it wasn't for him there wouldn't have been no Motlops and no Cubillo's playing for North
In 1997 Shannon and Daniels father (Eddie) asked his brother Mark who would be better to play under the Stringer or Bones and the answer came back McDermott. Now Thomas is at North (Marks son) and EJ has sent Josh down to North because Mark is coaching Wanderers in Darwin. With the NT footy community being so small, the Campbells followed the Motlops to North....
So North supporters thank your lucky stars you had Bones as a Coach otherwise the Motlops, Cubillos and dare I say it the Campbells would have gone to Glenelg......
by RM » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:56 pm
by am Bays » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:58 pm
by RM » Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:04 pm
by drebin » Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:15 pm
RM wrote:McSpermott got rid of Squire and that was a sensational move on his behalf![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Also asked a couple of supporters out side the clubrooms for more "talk" I have aledged heard also.
by GWW » Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:30 pm
RM wrote:A fine day Gww, MY ASS!
Was the most shitful day that I can remember on a GF. Even the TV camera man on the high bucket was taken down because of safety.
Yes the rain came at 1/2 time but the wind was enourmous and I remember waking up at 5am thinking that the weather suited Port as North were very one dimensional that year.
At the end of the day GWW, dont talk crap about the conditions and the game as there are a few of us at this site older thatn 25 years old.
by drebin » Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:37 pm
GWW wrote:RM wrote:A fine day Gww, MY ASS!
Was the most shitful day that I can remember on a GF. Even the TV camera man on the high bucket was taken down because of safety.
Yes the rain came at 1/2 time but the wind was enourmous and I remember waking up at 5am thinking that the weather suited Port as North were very one dimensional that year.
At the end of the day GWW, dont talk crap about the conditions and the game as there are a few of us at this site older thatn 25 years old.
Fine enough for Port to kick 15 goals
by doggies4eva » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:12 pm
by Aerie » Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:45 pm
doggies4eva wrote:They've also saved the world for the past two years by finishing third so we didn't have to listen to the rantings of their coach in GF week
by MUNGO JERRY » Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:10 pm
by Jimmy » Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:11 pm
RM wrote:McSpermott got rid of Squire and that was a sensational move on his behalf![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by eaglehaslanded » Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:49 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:When the SANFL needs a hero, who does it turn to?
North Adelaide of course!
When $trut were boring the pants off everyone, by winning 5 in a row, who put an end to it?
North Adelaide.
When the Bays "dominated" the competition for 2 years, who cast them aside like the beach bum scum they are?
North Adelaide.
When Pam's were cheating, backstabbing & trying to jump into bed with the AFL, who put an end to their 3 flags in a row?
North Adelaide.
& when we needed an SANFL club to stand up to the Vics, & the rest of Australia, by taking on all-comers, who was up to it?
North Adelaide.
The mighty Roosters!
And guess who is going to put an end to Central's dominance?
...........
by Punk Rooster » Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:38 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |