Trade Week

Talk on the national game

Re: Trade Week

Postby ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:13 am

A fit Mcintosh is easily in our top 5, as he was prior to doing his knee earlier in the year, dropped for the final because he was still underdone by 2-3 weeks IMO
User avatar
ChocolateNBlue
Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Up in the Gum Tree @ St Marys
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Trade Week

Postby Booney » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:15 am

So why shop him around.

If it was to ascertain his 'value' ie: a club was willing to give up a quality player and a 1st round pick,what (other than IMO making him somewhat confused)did it achieve?
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61710
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8211 times
Been liked: 11942 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:29 am

All that one could assume is that with the strong emergence of Goldstein and with Petrie, Hale and Brown also in the mix, Laidley must have been seeing what another club would part for to get him ie key position players or goalkicking midfielders, which we are in need of if we are to be a real threat. I agree, unfair to Hamish but you can see the logic behind it and as stated he was never going anywhere unless something 'fantastic' arose.
User avatar
ChocolateNBlue
Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Up in the Gum Tree @ St Marys
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Trade Week

Postby Dutchy » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:30 am

ChocolateNBlue wrote:All that one could assume is that with the strong emergence of Goldstein and with Petrie, Hale and Brown also in the mix, Laidley must have been seeing what another club would part for to get him ie key position players or goalkicking midfielders, which we are in need of if we are to be a real threat. I agree, unfair to Hamish but you can see the logic behind it and as stated he was never going anywhere unless something 'fantastic' arose.


Agree, Goldstein looks an outstanding prospect also, potentially better than McIntosh.

Please dont tell me you think Brown will be on our list next year :evil:
User avatar
Dutchy
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 46254
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:24 am
Location: Location, Location
Has liked: 2648 times
Been liked: 4316 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:39 am

Yes, slipped in it there didnt I Dutchy! Brown shits me to tears, cant understand why he was on our list the last 2-3 years! too many turnovers, and thats when he gets near it!
User avatar
ChocolateNBlue
Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:27 am
Location: Up in the Gum Tree @ St Marys
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Kenilworth

Re: Trade Week

Postby Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:37 pm

I'm happy that we got Thomson, good inside player who wasn't given the opportunity he probably deserved at the Power. Still only 21 or 22 I think so got plenty of footy ahead of him.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby stan » Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:32 pm

Pag wrote:I'm happy that we got Thomson, good inside player who wasn't given the opportunity he probably deserved at the Power. Still only 21 or 22 I think so got plenty of footy ahead of him.

I think that was a terrible trade by the power.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15524
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Trade Week

Postby silicone skyline » Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:42 pm

ChocolateNBlue wrote:All that one could assume is that with the strong emergence of Goldstein and with Petrie, Hale and Brown also in the mix, Laidley must have been seeing what another club would part for to get him ie key position players or goalkicking midfielders,


Just on Petrie, he is up there with the most improved this year. Sensational season IMHO
Ruthless and Relentless
User avatar
silicone skyline
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6329
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Amsterdam
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Trade Week

Postby hearts on fire » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:54 pm

what a boring trade week......... :roll:
~ R.I.P John McCarthy, 19-11-1989 - 9-9-2012 ~
User avatar
hearts on fire
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: naked
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: Trade Week

Postby Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:58 pm

It'll all happen tomorrow. Things always get held back til Thursday and Friday because clubs need picks from seperate trades to get other trades sorted. One the Warnock one goes down (if it does), along with Hawthorn/O'Keefe, I think a few may follow after that.

Just on Thomson again, this has a feel of a couple of years ago, when we traded Rodan to Port. Hopefully we get the same result and he becomes a regular.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby hearts on fire » Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:06 pm

I am disappointed that Port just let Thomson go like that, without any real fight, they gave up a decent player for a sh1tty draft pick. Hopefully this backfires in Port's face and Thomson becomes a real regular for the Tigers.

Once again Port, you have stuffed up....... :lol:
~ R.I.P John McCarthy, 19-11-1989 - 9-9-2012 ~
User avatar
hearts on fire
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: naked
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Ingle Farm

Re: Trade Week

Postby mypaddock » Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:45 pm

Trade "week" should be conducted over two days. One day for discussion and one day to conclude the deals. You can't tell me that clubs weren't all talking to each other before this week anyway. It is a long, drawn out process which isn't necessary.
mypaddock
League Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 9:51 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Trade Week

Postby stan » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:03 pm

mypaddock wrote:Trade "week" should be conducted over two days. One day for discussion and one day to conclude the deals. You can't tell me that clubs weren't all talking to each other before this week anyway. It is a long, drawn out process which isn't necessary.

Yeah that is true, cant argue there
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15524
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Trade Week

Postby FlyingHigh » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:59 pm

mypaddock wrote:Trade "week" should be conducted over two days. One day for discussion and one day to conclude the deals. You can't tell me that clubs weren't all talking to each other before this week anyway. It is a long, drawn out process which isn't necessary.


Don't say something sensible - if trade week were only 2 days then the AFL would be out of the spotlight for the rest of the week :wink:
FlyingHigh
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4911
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:12 am
Has liked: 87 times
Been liked: 182 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby devilsadvocate » Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:37 pm

hearts on fire wrote:I am disappointed that Port just let Thomson go like that, without any real fight, they gave up a decent player for a sh1tty draft pick. Hopefully this backfires in Port's face and Thomson becomes a real regular for the Tigers.

Once again Port, you have stuffed up....... :lol:


Agree on Port stuffing up, it's disappointing to see him go for pick 42. FFS pick 42!

Why you'd want it to backcire and for him to become a regular though?????

I really wish we'd pick predominantly SA born and bred talent to avoid this 'here for 2-3 years then go crying home to mummy' business.
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Trade Week

Postby Hondo » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:09 pm

I don't see the issue with a 3rd round pick in this year's draft for a non-established player

Port were never going to get a second round pick for him

This year pick 16 can't even get a multiple B+F, AA player :shock: (O'Keefe)

I think pick 42 this year has as much chance of working out as Thompson at Richmond, time will tell
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:37 pm

devilsadvocate wrote:
hearts on fire wrote:I am disappointed that Port just let Thomson go like that, without any real fight, they gave up a decent player for a sh1tty draft pick. Hopefully this backfires in Port's face and Thomson becomes a real regular for the Tigers.

Once again Port, you have stuffed up....... :lol:


Agree on Port stuffing up, it's disappointing to see him go for pick 42. FFS pick 42!

Why you'd want it to backcire and for him to become a regular though?????

I really wish we'd pick predominantly SA born and bred talent to avoid this 'here for 2-3 years then go crying home to mummy' business.
This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby devilsadvocate » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:58 pm

Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.


Ah, fair enough. But good performances get you game time, so maybe he needs to look at himself rather than to Richmond.
User avatar
devilsadvocate
Coach
 
Posts: 6872
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:28 pm
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Trade Week

Postby heater31 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:07 pm

devilsadvocate wrote:
Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.


Ah, fair enough. But good performances get you game time, so maybe he needs to look at himself rather than to Richmond.



Its clear as daylight to me that Adam and Mark Williams don't like each other. Thommo was ripping it up in the SANFL and he couldn't even get a sniff. Then the phoney story about having OP which coincidentally Adam didn't even know he had :roll: :roll:
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 533 times
Been liked: 1292 times

Re: Trade Week

Postby Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:07 pm

heater31 wrote:
devilsadvocate wrote:
Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.


Ah, fair enough. But good performances get you game time, so maybe he needs to look at himself rather than to Richmond.



Its clear as daylight to me that Adam and Mark Williams don't like each other. Thommo was ripping it up in the SANFL and he couldn't even get a sniff. Then the phoney story about having OP which coincidentally Adam didn't even know he had :roll: :roll:
Saw on the news tonight Thomson was asked about the relationship with Williams and he said with hardly any enthusiasm 'We had a chat once in a while'.

They sounded close...
User avatar
Pag
Coach
 
Posts: 5451
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:57 pm
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 511 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |