by ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:13 am
by Booney » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:15 am
by ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:29 am
by Dutchy » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:30 am
ChocolateNBlue wrote:All that one could assume is that with the strong emergence of Goldstein and with Petrie, Hale and Brown also in the mix, Laidley must have been seeing what another club would part for to get him ie key position players or goalkicking midfielders, which we are in need of if we are to be a real threat. I agree, unfair to Hamish but you can see the logic behind it and as stated he was never going anywhere unless something 'fantastic' arose.
by ChocolateNBlue » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:39 am
by Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:37 pm
by stan » Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:32 pm
Pag wrote:I'm happy that we got Thomson, good inside player who wasn't given the opportunity he probably deserved at the Power. Still only 21 or 22 I think so got plenty of footy ahead of him.
by silicone skyline » Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:42 pm
ChocolateNBlue wrote:All that one could assume is that with the strong emergence of Goldstein and with Petrie, Hale and Brown also in the mix, Laidley must have been seeing what another club would part for to get him ie key position players or goalkicking midfielders,
by hearts on fire » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:54 pm
by Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:58 pm
by hearts on fire » Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:06 pm
by mypaddock » Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:45 pm
by stan » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:03 pm
mypaddock wrote:Trade "week" should be conducted over two days. One day for discussion and one day to conclude the deals. You can't tell me that clubs weren't all talking to each other before this week anyway. It is a long, drawn out process which isn't necessary.
by FlyingHigh » Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:59 pm
mypaddock wrote:Trade "week" should be conducted over two days. One day for discussion and one day to conclude the deals. You can't tell me that clubs weren't all talking to each other before this week anyway. It is a long, drawn out process which isn't necessary.
by devilsadvocate » Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:37 pm
hearts on fire wrote:I am disappointed that Port just let Thomson go like that, without any real fight, they gave up a decent player for a sh1tty draft pick. Hopefully this backfires in Port's face and Thomson becomes a real regular for the Tigers.
Once again Port, you have stuffed up.......
by Hondo » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:09 pm
by Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:37 pm
This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.devilsadvocate wrote:hearts on fire wrote:I am disappointed that Port just let Thomson go like that, without any real fight, they gave up a decent player for a sh1tty draft pick. Hopefully this backfires in Port's face and Thomson becomes a real regular for the Tigers.
Once again Port, you have stuffed up.......
Agree on Port stuffing up, it's disappointing to see him go for pick 42. FFS pick 42!
Why you'd want it to backcire and for him to become a regular though?????
I really wish we'd pick predominantly SA born and bred talent to avoid this 'here for 2-3 years then go crying home to mummy' business.
by devilsadvocate » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:58 pm
Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.
by heater31 » Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:07 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.
Ah, fair enough. But good performances get you game time, so maybe he needs to look at himself rather than to Richmond.
by Pag » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:07 pm
Saw on the news tonight Thomson was asked about the relationship with Williams and he said with hardly any enthusiasm 'We had a chat once in a while'.heater31 wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:Pag wrote:This one wasn't the go-home factor DA, I think Thomson would've gone anywhere for more game time and a chance to become a consistent AFL footballer. Port brought this on themselves for not giving him a decent crack.
Ah, fair enough. But good performances get you game time, so maybe he needs to look at himself rather than to Richmond.
Its clear as daylight to me that Adam and Mark Williams don't like each other. Thommo was ripping it up in the SANFL and he couldn't even get a sniff. Then the phoney story about having OP which coincidentally Adam didn't even know he had![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |