John_Fidge wrote:Obviously not next season as Hill has done a good job this year.
Not a Norwood supporter I take it?
by topsywaldron » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:45 pm
John_Fidge wrote:Obviously not next season as Hill has done a good job this year.
by EAGLES » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:55 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:09 pm
EAGLES wrote:Did the members of the Roost get their knives back from Jarman?
by Adam4 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:40 pm
Grahaml wrote:Why should a club's supporters not want the best for the club? Blindly sticking by anyone is how many good organisations have fallen. North, like all clubs should be always assessing whether any individual is the best for the job. You don't want people being sacked all the time, but once someone is not the best available for the job the club in this case should act quickly to get that right person involved. The dogs had Clarkson, but decided he wasn't the best for the club. Clarkson won a flag and lost a GF in his 2 seasons at the helm, a record Jarman doesn't compare to. Clarkson was moved on and the club got bigger and better. And when the time comes that Grant, Laird or anyone at the CDFC is no longer the best for their job I'd hope that the decision is made quickly and with as little disruption as possible. If it's time to part ways, then the NAFC needs to make that decision in the best interests of the club. However, if Jarman is the right person for the job the NAFC should sign him ASAP and the supporters should get behind him. Blind faith led to the crusades and the third reich. Nobody is above being questioned, nobody is always right and nobody deserves a job for life.
by Dirko » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:42 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:46 pm
Barto wrote:Jarman had contacted Freo and expressed and interest but the club haven't looked at getting him, according to Chris Bong on 6PR
by Adam4 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:00 pm
by Jackal » Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:15 pm
by Barto » Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:40 am
rod_rooster wrote:Barto wrote:Jarman had contacted Freo and expressed and interest but the club haven't looked at getting him, according to Chris Bong on 6PR
Bet he's a relaxed kind of bloke![]()
by Punk Rooster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:14 am
EAGLES wrote:Did the members of the Roost get their knives back from Jarman?
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by am Bays » Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:50 am
by saintal » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:00 am
by rod_rooster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:06 am
saintal wrote:Without really knowing the full story and looking at the situation on face value, it seems a pretty tough call on Jars. Did a hell of a lot for the club. Went downhill when they start signing soft, money chasers like Archard
Hard to believe that he "didnt have the passion". What a cop out..
by Pseudo » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:23 am
Adam4 wrote:ANJ’s contract was complete, so surely a non-extension does not imply a sacking.
by saintal » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:48 am
by Barto » Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:14 pm
Pseudo wrote:Adam4 wrote:ANJ’s contract was complete, so surely a non-extension does not imply a sacking.
Non-extension = sacked. ANJ is not leaving of his own volition; he was dismissed by the club.
To paraphrase Shakespeare: That which we call a turd by any other name would smell as rotten.
I'm not criticising the Roosters or ANJ. Merely pointing out that sugar-coating reality does not change its essence.
by Alby_Green » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:31 pm
Wedgie wrote: I had a look at the old Roost and Macgowan and Trevor Hill were both on the same short list as Jars back at the end of 2003.
Ironic that those 2 are coaching sides in the finals at the moment.
by bulldogs » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:41 pm
by Sponge Bob » Thu Sep 11, 2008 3:55 pm
Pseudo wrote:Adam4 wrote:ANJ’s contract was complete, so surely a non-extension does not imply a sacking.
Non-extension = sacked. ANJ is not leaving of his own volition; he was dismissed by the club.
To paraphrase Shakespeare: That which we call a turd by any other name would smell as rotten.
I'm not criticising the Roosters or ANJ. Merely pointing out that sugar-coating reality does not change its essence.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |