by Booney » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:49 pm
by Psyber » Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:00 pm
I'm not calling him a "star" Booney, but he has been in the best player list fairly consistently. The Port hierarchy did under rate him, and I think they are doing so with Thomson too.Booney wrote: .. Now he has been given chances at Adelaide he has been servicable and I dont expect many Crow fans would say he has been any more than that, sound without being stand out.
by GWW » Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:28 pm
Booney wrote:In Thompson I think Port have a tough hard runner who may just lack a bit of polish,now dont get me wrong I think he should be in our 22 and be given a real opportunity to settle.He could play the role that a clearly injury hampered Jacob Surjan did this year.Not many rate Surjan and I can honestly say dont rate him on 08.
Thompson I think should be played off half back and not entirely as a midfielder as midfielders in the main are and inch or two taller than him and he just lacks a bit in the air.I would not like to see him leave,that's for sure.
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:38 pm
Dutchy wrote:and more than likely Port will not allow him play for Sturt in the finals....
by GWW » Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:47 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:and more than likely Port will not allow him play for Sturt in the finals....
Don't know why you'd have reason to think that, but I can guess why you'd like to think that. Playing for Sturt in the finals will more than likely increase his price and bargaining power for the power.
by Rucciangelo » Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:38 am
GWW wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:and more than likely Port will not allow him play for Sturt in the finals....
Don't know why you'd have reason to think that, but I can guess why you'd like to think that. Playing for Sturt in the finals will more than likely increase his price and bargaining power for the power.
And if he gets a relatively serious injury, Port would get nothing whatsoever for him.
by Dutchy » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:52 am
Rucciangelo wrote:GWW wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:Dutchy wrote:and more than likely Port will not allow him play for Sturt in the finals....
Don't know why you'd have reason to think that, but I can guess why you'd like to think that. Playing for Sturt in the finals will more than likely increase his price and bargaining power for the power.
And if he gets a relatively serious injury, Port would get nothing whatsoever for him.
Oh C'mon...he's been playing all year with Osteo Pubis!
by Barto » Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:55 pm
by blink » Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:32 am
by NO-MERCY » Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:41 pm
by Psyber » Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:05 pm
I think they will regret it some time in the future when they play Richmond. I'd have been happy if the Crows had picked him up that cheaply.NO-MERCY wrote:Good to see Adam Thomson picked up by Richmond, good luck to the bloke he wasn't given a fair enough go at Port.
For the pathetic season they ( the Power ) had & not to give Thomo a fair opportunity to prove himself may come back big time & bite them hard in the arse, i hope it does!
by RustyCage » Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:39 pm
by Psyber » Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:38 pm
He seemed to be doing better than a lot of his team mates in the few Power games I saw on TV from here in Victoria.pafc1870 wrote:He played a third of the season this year, so he was given a go. Maybe he just wasnt good enough? SANFL form means very little.
by Booney » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:23 am
by Footy Smart » Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:48 am
pafc1870 wrote:He played a third of the season this year, so he was given a go. Maybe he just wasnt good enough? SANFL form means very little.
by stan » Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:31 am
Footy Smart wrote:pafc1870 wrote:He played a third of the season this year, so he was given a go. Maybe he just wasnt good enough? SANFL form means very little.
Adam Thomson averages 14.5 possies in 60% game time in the games he played in season 2008.... not bad for a youngster still learning the trade. IMO Port didnt give him enough opportunity in a season that was had lots of injury and players down on form. There is no doubt in my mind that choco didnt like him and thats why he is gone.
by Magpiespower » Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:27 am
stan wrote:
I rate Thomson, Really think he'll be alright at AFL level, just needs to be given a full run.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:42 am
Magpiespower wrote:stan wrote:
I rate Thomson, Really think he'll be alright at AFL level, just needs to be given a full run.
Even though I rate Thomson - he's looked great in patches...
Good players never need an excuse.
by Booney » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:44 am
by JK » Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:53 am
Booney wrote:P.Burgoyne,S.Burgoyne,Salopek,Boak,C.Cornes,K.Cornes,Cassisi.
Which one of them would you drop to have given Thomson a real go NM? If all of them were fit at once.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |