Psyber wrote: There is class in sport apparently...
I did say apparently, not
certainly guys. And I wasn't trying to "isolate foorballers for stupidity".
I assume factors like your general interests and experience as a child, and your intelligence, help shape what sport you choose, and perhaps that the average guy chooses the most commonly played sport in their community, unless their are strong family factors pushing another direction..
The Cricket captain was the school's best cricket player, and not bad at Hockey. He was also a useful Chess player.
The Hockey captain was not quite the best Hockey player, but the most consistent, a good leader, and a useful Cricket player [and pianist]..
Neither of them turned out to be Paedophiles, or demonstrated other vices.
This side discussion has prompted some thought about the issue.
At Woodville High, back then, the boys' classes were streamed A to F, transparently on the basis of initial IQ testing, although some attempt was made to hide it. People moved up and down in the streams in later years based on academic performance and equalising class sizes. The guy with the highest score on the tests played no sport, failed academically and dropped out. The girl with the highest score played Hockey, was girl's head prefect, then got pregnant to an engineering student, married him, and dropped out.
Most of the Cricket and Hockey players came from the A stream. Most of the footy players were in the B stream, or sometimes transferred back and forth between B and A - Bruce Nyland [PAM] was one of these as was Terry Groom [Labor Senator and lawyer]. Surfers tended to be in this transitional group too. There didn't seem to be many sporting types on the C and D streams. E and F included most of the Baseball players. The few [including me] who took up classical wrestling when we had an American teacher at the school, and Fencing when we had a former UK actor as an English teacher, came from the A stream. They were a small group who kept trying whatever was new.
I don't know what it all means, and I don't think that small sample proves much, but I find it interesting. I would be interested in other peoples' observations from their experience to broaden the sample.