Home ground crowd averages

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby topsywaldron » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:18 pm

drebin wrote:Good to see two of the most Anti-North posters on safooty ..


You and who else? :D
'People are not stupid. They know when they are being conned. And two reserves teams operating in a League competition will reduce it to a farce, a competition without a soul.'

Dion Hayman 24th July 2013
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:24 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:It seems Glenn wants north supporters to have a forum - The Roost - but you MUST say this and noT mention this etc.......

The club tried their own forum when they went pro with their site but it failed.

The club either:
a) ignore the Roost which they shouldnt, they should embrace a forum where a large cross section of their members discuss issue
or
b) they read the Roost, take note of it but say publicly they don't read it.

IMHO its (b) as most NAFC staff, players, etc Ive ever talked to read it religiously, someone's even seen it on Glenn's PC and he's quite often discussed matters with me that have been risen on the Roost, as have most board members.

Clubs should embrace their members in online communities, most do, I think CD does a fantastic job and I think the way that Norwood actually made their fans forum apart of their official site is great, as I understand most of others forums are used in a smart manner by their clubs too, as should they.

But with the Roost and the "Virtual Runner" on the official NAFC site North fans do have 2 fairly good facilities to discuss the club and ask any official questions too.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby Rushby Hinds » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:32 pm

Wedgie wrote:
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:It seems Glenn wants north supporters to have a forum - The Roost - but you MUST say this and noT mention this etc.......

The club tried their own forum when they went pro with their site but it failed.

The club either:
a) ignore the Roost which they shouldnt, they should embrace a forum where a large cross section of their members discuss issue
or
b) they read the Roost, take note of it but say publicly they don't read it.

IMHO its (b) as most NAFC staff, players, etc Ive ever talked to read it religiously, someone's even seen it on Glenn's PC and he's quite often discussed matters with me that have been risen on the Roost, as have most board members.

Clubs should embrace their members in online communities, most do, I think CD does a fantastic job and I think the way that Norwood actually made their fans forum apart of their official site is great, as I understand most of others forums are used in a smart manner by their clubs too, as should they.

But with the Roost and the "Virtual Runner" on the official NAFC site North fans do have 2 fairly good facilities to discuss the club and ask any official questions too.


Wedgie, If there was a hypothetical forum about my work place that said sack me, sack my boss, that I tell lies, that I have imploded, that tells everyone how much people THINK i get paid, bagging a sponsors product, that i don't treat people with respect, etc etc, I'd hardly embrace it.......
He's still my hero even if he is a little bit crap.
User avatar
Rushby Hinds
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 9:40 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:35 pm

Rushby Hinds wrote:Wedgie, If there was a hypothetical forum about my work place that said sack me, sack my boss, that I tell lies, that I have imploded, that tells everyone how much people THINK i get paid, bagging a sponsors product, that i don't treat people with respect, etc etc, I'd hardly embrace it.......

Fair enough mate, that's where we differ, personally I would embrace it and address the issues and stop telling lies as it would make the business work better hypothetically speaking.
Ignoring what the hypothetical shareholders think and not addressing their issues most of which are warranted would be a terrible way to do business and send most hypothetical business broke IMHO.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Home ground crowd averages

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:38 pm

For those who expressed confusion the article addressing home ground issues address The Roost and the feeling of members is very relevent when it comes to why crowds are down.
Your post doesn't have anything to do with the topic though, if you have any future issues perhaps send a pm and I'll address it for you.
Cheers.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Home ground crowd averages

Postby Baron Greenback » Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:39 pm

I can't believe South's crowds have actually gone up this year.
Last year they were playing half decent footy, this year I can't believe some of the tripe they're serving up.
For the first time in my life I'm actually ashamed to barrack for them.
Ham and eggs for breakfast, ham and eggs for tea
User avatar
Baron Greenback
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6916
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:57 am
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 26 times
Grassroots Team: Paringa

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby pipers » Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:20 pm

drebin wrote:Good to see two of the most Anti-North posters on safooty have (1) Started the topic and (2) Contributed to it.

Just in case we missed it fatal - what is your point in having a go at the CEO's comments?

If you think it's not 'rocket science' in what he said, do use your vast Football Operations knowledge and expertise to tell us exactly what he should have said? Then when you supply us with the hidden secrets of your wisdom we will follow Mr. Elliotts words of wisdom and ring the club to pass on your suggestions! :roll:


Dreb, I posted a reply to this but it seemed to go missing as part of the merging of my topic with this thread (or it could be to do with the fact I mentioned the alledged night-time incident a few weeks ago)...

Anyway, can't be bothered reposting, and basically Squawk has said the same thing. I was being sympathetic and suggested that Elliot was glossing-over the whole lack of player belief in Jarman thing which was contributing to poor on-field performances which of course has an effect on attendances...

Trying to use West and South as an excuse is piss-weak, as they've been carp for years!
"loyalty is dead"
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby TigerBoss » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:04 pm

Wedgie wrote:
Rushby Hinds wrote:Wedgie, If there was a hypothetical forum about my work place that said sack me, sack my boss, that I tell lies, that I have imploded, that tells everyone how much people THINK i get paid, bagging a sponsors product, that i don't treat people with respect, etc etc, I'd hardly embrace it.......

Fair enough mate, that's where we differ, personally I would embrace it and address the issues and stop telling lies as it would make the business work better hypothetically speaking.
Ignoring what the hypothetical shareholders think and not addressing their issues most of which are warranted would be a terrible way to do business and send most hypothetical business broke IMHO.


Broken record but would the NAFC hierarchy ever win regardless what they said or did?
Is 2009 the year of the Tiger?
User avatar
TigerBoss
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:59 am
Location: Snout's Bar!
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Lock

Re: Home ground crowd averages

Postby pipers » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:37 pm

I'm with Wedgie on this...

OF COURSE THEY READ IT!

No matter how little credence a club's management pay to their supporter-base (which in North's case is allegedly very little) you would keep an eye on forums like that. It would simply be bad business not to.

Pretending that you pretend forums like The Roost don't exist is pathetic...

Sort of like pretending that three of your players weren't on club premises without authorisation one night... Ah, wait... tried that didn't they...
"loyalty is dead"
User avatar
pipers
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:35 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Adelaide Lutheran

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby ElizabethVCRThief » Thu Jul 17, 2008 3:50 pm

Rushby Hinds wrote:If there was a hypothetical forum about my work place that said sack me, sack my boss, that I tell lies, that I have imploded, that tells everyone how much people THINK i get paid, bagging a sponsors product, that i don't treat people with respect, etc etc, I'd hardly embrace it.......


Where can i sign up for this forum? :wink:
User avatar
ElizabethVCRThief
Rookie
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:01 am
Location: Cash Converters
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Elliot acknowledges frontrunner element

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 4:17 pm

TigerBoss wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Rushby Hinds wrote:Wedgie, If there was a hypothetical forum about my work place that said sack me, sack my boss, that I tell lies, that I have imploded, that tells everyone how much people THINK i get paid, bagging a sponsors product, that i don't treat people with respect, etc etc, I'd hardly embrace it.......

Fair enough mate, that's where we differ, personally I would embrace it and address the issues and stop telling lies as it would make the business work better hypothetically speaking.
Ignoring what the hypothetical shareholders think and not addressing their issues most of which are warranted would be a terrible way to do business and send most hypothetical business broke IMHO.


Broken record but would the NAFC hierarchy ever win regardless what they said or did?


Definately, they win a lot now, positive stuff as well as negative stuff is posted on the roost, its just the negative stuff that gets more publicity obviously, they had a kids pie night on Monday night and that got a lot of praise.
As long as they put the members first and not themselves and were honest in their communications it would be a win/win.
They could use it effectively to their and the members benefit if they had someone like CD on board.

PS Fatal, you're spot on mate
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

NAFC having a whinge

Postby NFC » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:07 pm

Per the NAFC website...
Forever on TV

North seems to have mortgage on live coverage this season, particularly at Prospect. Including the latest schedule, we have been programmed for five of a possible 8 home games for direct ABC coverage - the remaining two are Sundays. Great for advertising, but it doesn't help attendances.
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:13 pm

It's possibly a fair argument, although the TV coverage isn't live, so I can't imagine why that would stop you from attending.

As for Sunday matches, I don't like them at all.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:15 pm

Half glass empty sort of guy NFC?

I would have thought "Great for Advertising" would be the opposite to having a whinge?

Having more TV games than other clubs has both its positive and negatives, Im not sure what the issue is there.

Full marks to the NAFC for making their website interesting enough for fans of other clubs wanting to visit there.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby NFC » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:19 pm

Wedgie wrote:Half glass empty sort of guy NFC?

I would have thought "Great for Advertising" would be the opposite to having a whinge?

Having more TV games than other clubs has both its positive and negatives, Im not sure what the issue is there.

Full marks to the NAFC for making their website interesting enough for fans of other clubs wanting to visit there.

Fair post. But if they were performing better there wouldn't be attendance issues and they wouldn't need to blame the ABC for constantly showing their games...
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby Grahaml » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:22 pm

Sorry Wedge, I have to agree with NFC. The quote comes across as a negative more than a positive IMHO. Admittedly it's a little unclear but I would read it as implying that they would rather not have the coverage.

Anyway, since when did 5 out of 8 leave only 2?
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:22 pm

NFC wrote:
Wedgie wrote:Half glass empty sort of guy NFC?

I would have thought "Great for Advertising" would be the opposite to having a whinge?

Having more TV games than other clubs has both its positive and negatives, Im not sure what the issue is there.

Full marks to the NAFC for making their website interesting enough for fans of other clubs wanting to visit there.

Fair post. But if they were performing better there wouldn't be attendance issues and they wouldn't need to blame the ABC for constantly showing their games...

They don't just blame the ABC for their attendances, didn't you see the topic about the article with Glenn Elliott?
Have a look at the Home Attendances thread, Ive listed quite a few reasons why crowds are down, it really isn't rocket science.

Only whinge I see is yours, Im very critical of North when they do something wrong but stating the bleeding the obvious on a medium for their members isn't one of them.

In fact I think its a huge positive that they make their site so interesting that fans of other clubs also want to read it, I love my SANFL but I honestly couldn't imagine being bored enough to wanting to read the Norwood site, have visited the Eagles site but that was only to see when their Gala Dinner was starting.
Perhaps the thread should read "Congrats to North for their interesting website and Boo to all the other clubs with boring websites", that's what a half glass full sort of person would do. :wink:

PS I just found all the official crowds for Prospect in 3 seconds flat on the official NAFC website, I thought I'd do a study and see if I could do the same on the Norwood website, can someone point me in the direction where I can do this? Ive given up after 30 seconds. Can't even find something as simple as the attendance for last week! :? Its websites like that, that we SHOULD be critical of.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby goraw » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:29 pm

Grahaml wrote:Sorry Wedge, I have to agree with NFC. The quote comes across as a negative more than a positive IMHO. Admittedly it's a little unclear but I would read it as implying that they would rather not have the coverage.

Anyway, since when did 5 out of 8 leave only 2?


graham 5 out of a POSSIBLE(=saturday) 8. the remaining 2 are sunday.
goraw
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1739
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:16 am
Location: prospect
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Gaza

Re: Home ground crowd averages

Postby Wedgie » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:31 pm

Another merger made, we really don't need yet another floating around about home match attendances and the reasons for it.
Cheers.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: NAFC having a whinge

Postby NFC » Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:32 pm

Wedgie wrote:PS I just found all the official crowds for Prospect in 3 seconds flat on the official NAFC website, I thought I'd do a study and see if I could do the same on the Norwood website, can someone point me in the direction where I can do this? Ive given up after 30 seconds. Can't even find something as simple as the attendance for last week! :? Its websites like that, that we SHOULD be critical of.

At Cooper's Stadium

Not hard now was it? :roll: :oops: :wink:
User avatar
NFC
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5552
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:13 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], pmackk and 40 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |