by Golo#46 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:23 pm
by am Bays » Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:16 pm
by stan » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:17 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:NO coincidence (IMO) that Port Power haven't won a game since Michael Wilson got injured....
by devilsadvocate » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:19 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:NO coincidence (IMO) that Port Power haven't won a game since Michael Wilson got injured....
by am Bays » Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:23 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:NO coincidence (IMO) that Port Power haven't won a game since Michael Wilson got injured....
EXACTLY. He's my favourite player because he's probably made more of his limited ability than any other player, simply by beating people with his competitive spirit.
He can't return soon enough IMO.
by Booney » Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:10 am
by Felch » Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:14 am
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:NO coincidence (IMO) that Port Power haven't won a game since Michael Wilson got injured....
EXACTLY. He's my favourite player because he's probably made more of his limited ability than any other player, simply by beating people with his competitive spirit.
He can't return soon enough IMO.
Trust me DA, he's not just rated by Port supporters......
quality player, quality individual...the epitome of real footy toughness (along with our current skipper at the Bay - Ben Mules) in my book.
by Dutchy » Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:57 pm
by evans01 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:17 pm
by grant j » Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:29 pm
having watched a number of games this year it seems to me the Power have got this awful habit of over using the ball, far to much handball, short kicking etc...........they seem unable to play clear direct footy, sure they havent got alot of key position forwards, but they seem continually looking for options??
maybe this is also a confidence thing as they dont have (at the moment) to many match winning dominant players..............
But FFS kick the frigging ball!!!!!!!...........stop this reliance on the short game and start to look down the ground and kick to position!!!............
by Blue Boy » Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:44 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:34 am
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:52 am
WTF is the AFL thinking bringing in new sides when your have underachieving jokes like Port Adelaide going around who can't even draw a crowd in an Australian Rules Football state let alone get within 100 points of a decent team in a game that counts?
The experiment has failed, no crowd, no heart, no score, Port are a joke in the AFL.
Bring a 2nd composite side in Adelaide now to replace Port before going any further now AFL before its too late!!!!!!
Port are the biggest joke of the entire world.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by hearts on fire » Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:54 am
Wedgie wrote:I'll repeat what I said in another thread as it seems apt to this topic:WTF is the AFL thinking bringing in new sides when your have underachieving jokes like Port Adelaide going around who can't even draw a crowd in an Australian Rules Football state let alone get within 100 points of a decent team in a game that counts?
The experiment has failed, no crowd, no heart, no score, Port are a joke in the AFL.
Bring a 2nd composite side in Adelaide now to replace Port before going any further now AFL before its too late!!!!!!
Port are the biggest joke of the entire world.
by Dutchy » Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:00 am
Dutchy wrote:just been looking through my stats for the year to date and its quite obvious why Port arent going well, their defence is really struggling, statistically the worst in the league....missing Wakelin I feel, plus Wilson obviously....look at their names back six in the paper today....not good, be interesting to see how they handle Brown and Bradshaw tomorrow night...
by NFC » Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:14 am
stan wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:NO coincidence (IMO) that Port Power haven't won a game since Michael Wilson got injured....
Hes a real hard nut that you cant replace.
by evans01 » Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:21 pm
Wedgie wrote:I'll repeat what I said in another thread as it seems apt to this topic:WTF is the AFL thinking bringing in new sides when your have underachieving jokes like Port Adelaide going around who can't even draw a crowd in an Australian Rules Football state let alone get within 100 points of a decent team in a game that counts?
The experiment has failed, no crowd, no heart, no score, no teeth, Port are a joke in the AFL.
Bring a 2nd composite side in Adelaide now to replace Port before going any further now AFL before its too late!!!!!!
Port are the biggest joke of the entire world.
by Wedgie » Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:13 pm
evans01 wrote:Wedgie wrote:I'll repeat what I said in another thread as it seems apt to this topic:WTF is the AFL thinking bringing in new sides when your have underachieving jokes like Port Adelaide going around who can't even draw a crowd in an Australian Rules Football state let alone get within 100 points of a decent team in a game that counts?
The experiment has failed, no crowd, no heart, no score, Port are a joke in the AFL.
Bring a 2nd composite side in Adelaide now to replace Port before going any further now AFL before its too late!!!!!!
Port are the biggest joke of the entire world.
wonder wot you said in 2004????...........
and if your fishing get a life Wedgie...................................
let me guess your answer would be to replace them with a largely North Adelaide influenced side???...........frigging joke!!!!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Squawk » Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:08 pm
Wedgie wrote:No, just another composite side like the Crows.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |