Flamin ridiculous. Perhaps they should concentrate on getting this comp right.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
Could be an attempt to recover some of the money the womens footy is haemorrhaging.
Flamin ridiculous. Perhaps they should concentrate on getting this comp right.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
1993? Wasn't still running then was it?mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The sanfl did it back in the early 90s to replace pre season comp. I remember going to see Eagles v centrals on a tuesaday/Wednesday night play the grand final. Freezing cold. Not many others there.
Think it may have been 1993?
The one against Centrals was in '94. For some reason this game comes up on here every year or so.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The sanfl did it back in the early 90s to replace pre season comp. I remember going to see Eagles v centrals on a tuesaday/Wednesday night play the grand final. Freezing cold. Not many others there.
Think it may have been 1993?
Like the top 2 sides after 9 rounds or something?RB wrote:The one against Centrals was in '94. For some reason this game comes up on here every year or so.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The sanfl did it back in the early 90s to replace pre season comp. I remember going to see Eagles v centrals on a tuesaday/Wednesday night play the grand final. Freezing cold. Not many others there.
Think it may have been 1993?
Was a Tuesday night in gale force winds. The crowd would have been five figures though I reckon.
Much like when the Government are in trouble, they'll resort to a discussion about making Aust a Republic or changing the Aust flag.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
From memory, some games counted towards the Foundation Cup and some didn't. They might also have had a game or two each before the minor round as part of it? Can't recall exactly and I don't think I have any budgets from that year.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Like the top 2 sides after 9 rounds or something?RB wrote:The one against Centrals was in '94. For some reason this game comes up on here every year or so.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The sanfl did it back in the early 90s to replace pre season comp. I remember going to see Eagles v centrals on a tuesaday/Wednesday night play the grand final. Freezing cold. Not many others there.
Think it may have been 1993?
Was a Tuesday night in gale force winds. The crowd would have been five figures though I reckon.
100%Lightning McQueen wrote:Flamin ridiculous. Perhaps they should concentrate on getting this comp right.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
Could be an attempt to recover some of the money the womens footy is haemorrhaging.
Once again if you want to know what the AFL will look like in 5 years' time just watch the NBA now. Everything they do is an adaption of what USA sports has been doing for a period of time.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
Yep remember my old man taking me. He was so bloody excited Centrals were in a 'Grand Final' at that we might win a trophy.RB wrote:The one against Centrals was in '94. For some reason this game comes up on here every year or so.mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The sanfl did it back in the early 90s to replace pre season comp. I remember going to see Eagles v centrals on a tuesaday/Wednesday night play the grand final. Freezing cold. Not many others there.
Think it may have been 1993?
Was a Tuesday night in gale force winds. The crowd would have been five figures though I reckon.
Which is absolutely lunacy, because the NBA tv ratings are at historic lows. I really struggle to watch a regular NBA game, much rather watch the NBL. Their joke of an All-Star weekend is challenging the NFL for most redundant, at least the NFL can have the excuse that some of the best players aren't available due to the Super Bowl.whufc wrote:Once again if you want to know what the AFL will look like in 5 years' time just watch the NBA now. Everything they do is an adaption of what USA sports has been doing for a period of time.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
Yep … amazing they haven’t yet gone with wildcardswhufc wrote:Once again if you want to know what the AFL will look like in 5 years' time just watch the NBA now. Everything they do is an adaption of what USA sports has been doing for a period of time.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
Won't be long.dedja wrote:Yep … amazing they haven’t yet gone with wildcardswhufc wrote:Once again if you want to know what the AFL will look like in 5 years' time just watch the NBA now. Everything they do is an adaption of what USA sports has been doing for a period of time.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
When there are 20 teams, it should split into two divisions. Teams play everyone twice, top 5 finals, two bottom teams from top division get relegated and two Grand Finalist from 2nd division go up. Extra excitement with promotion and relegation. Plus it gives teams like St Kilda and Essendon a chance to win a flagwhufc wrote:Won't be long.dedja wrote:Yep … amazing they haven’t yet gone with wildcardswhufc wrote:Once again if you want to know what the AFL will look like in 5 years' time just watch the NBA now. Everything they do is an adaption of what USA sports has been doing for a period of time.Armchair expert wrote:Thoughts on the in-season tournament idea?
I absolutely hate it.
I think once they get to 20 teams it will be a top 8 and then a couple of wildcards to make a top 10 style format.
Come on we all know the 20 team decision won't be based of talent.... purely be a tv rights business decision and the AFL knows blind loyalty will mean fans follow their team no matter what. If Collingwood are top they will get huge crowds/tv viewers no matter the standard.dedja wrote:They’re isn’t enough quality talent for 18 teams … 20 teams would be lunacy.
That’s why the AFL have completely lost the plot. It’s all about $$$. Not for profit my arse.whufc wrote:Come on we all know the 20 team decision won't be based of talent.... purely be a tv rights business decision and the AFL knows blind loyalty will mean fans follow their team no matter what. If Collingwood are top they will get huge crowds/tv viewers no matter the standard.dedja wrote:They’re isn’t enough quality talent for 18 teams … 20 teams would be lunacy.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 187 guests