The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL
MJP1993
Under 18s
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:34 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 470 times
Been thanked: 56 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by MJP1993 »

whybother wrote:Best $5k Kochie has ever spent

Wasn't that the phrase attributed to a Centrals boss when he got the Gowans twins signed on ?


Yep
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
Posts: 5826
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:35 am
Team: Eagles
Has thanked: 199 times
Been thanked: 610 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Aerie »

Maybe the SANFL, via it's league competition, should go all in and facilitate Sydney, GWS, Brisbane and Gold Coast Reserves teams in exchange for more AFL cash and sponsorship to keep our clubs and competition afloat and maintain its aim to be the 2nd best competition in Australia? Add Southport and Darwin.

Or we just aim to be the best competition in South Australia? Even if that means merging into a divisional structure with the Adelaide Footy League and perhaps the bigger leagues closer to the city, so each club can find its own sustainable way.
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
Posts: 15660
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 6:00 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Collingwood
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 897 times
Been thanked: 1407 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Jimmy_041 »

Aerie wrote:Maybe the SANFL, via it's league competition, should go all in and facilitate Sydney, GWS, Brisbane and Gold Coast Reserves teams in exchange for more AFL cash and sponsorship to keep our clubs and competition afloat and maintain its aim to be the 2nd best competition in Australia? Add Southport and Darwin.

Or we just aim to be the best competition in South Australia? Even if that means merging into a divisional structure with the Adelaide Footy League and perhaps the bigger leagues closer to the city, so each club can find its own sustainable way.


That would never happen
The AdFL doesn't need them and probably has more cash than them (which is the usual reason for something like that happening)
There is already cooperation / interchange of players between some SANFL and AdFL clubs
dedja: Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
gazzamagoo

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by gazzamagoo »

It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by dedja »

gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!


Not needed now, a dozen meagre SANFL players cannot match what one Rory Atkins will bring to the Power reserves.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!

How's it failing, they don't really need to recruit anyone else if they don't want. They got a $70k boost to spend on 1 or 4 players. I assume they'd be waiting until after the draft. P.s be "funny" if the Crow drafted Mclennan.
wenchbarwer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4319
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:00 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 2021 times
Been thanked: 977 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by wenchbarwer »

Dogs64 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!

How's it failing, they don't really need to recruit anyone else if they don't want. They got a $70k boost to spend on 1 or 4 players. I assume they'd be waiting until after the draft. P.s be "funny" if the Crow drafted Mclennan.


They have Cumming & Peatling, McLennan wouldn't even be on their watchlist now
my yes be yes, my no be no
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:05 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by daysofourlives »

Dogs64 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!

How's it failing, they don't really need to recruit anyone else if they don't want. They got a $70k boost to spend on 1 or 4 players. I assume they'd be waiting until after the draft. P.s be "funny" if the Crow drafted Mclennan.


That 70k should have to be split equally between 4. If they dont get 4 so be it but quarter of 70k is all one player should get
They are probably likely to get the best 2 players for 35k each so the SANFL clubs cant compete with that
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:34 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by am Bays »

daysofourlives wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!

How's it failing, they don't really need to recruit anyone else if they don't want. They got a $70k boost to spend on 1 or 4 players. I assume they'd be waiting until after the draft. P.s be "funny" if the Crow drafted Mclennan.


That 70k should have to be split equally between 4. If they dont get 4 so be it but quarter of 70k is all one player should get
They are probably likely to get the best 2 players for 35k each so the SANFL clubs cant compete with that


Take it up with Megsy.

Only South supporters can take the high moral ground and complain about this set up now you’re down here with us “Yes” voters…
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

am Bays wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:It's all gone quiet on the player pinching front!
Apart from McClennan, no-one else has been pilfered,
is this new deal failing!

How's it failing, they don't really need to recruit anyone else if they don't want. They got a $70k boost to spend on 1 or 4 players. I assume they'd be waiting until after the draft. P.s be "funny" if the Crow drafted Mclennan.


That 70k should have to be split equally between 4. If they dont get 4 so be it but quarter of 70k is all one player should get
They are probably likely to get the best 2 players for 35k each so the SANFL clubs cant compete with that


Take it up with Megsy.

Only South supporters can take the high moral ground and complain about this set up now you’re down here with us “Yes” voters…


Raises a lot of questions.
Mark Ross has been quoted as saying, "If we're being honest, we didn't vote for it that way. Our CEO, Greg Edwards, was on the committee and he was pretty strong in the fact that he thought the four players that are 21 or over that were going to be taken by either the Crows or Port should come from any of the interstate competitions, not South Australia".....When asked if he thinks the initiative will result in more players being brought up to the AFL through the SANFL pathway, Ross had his doubts. "You can play in Timbuktu, mate" he said "If you're good enough, they draft you. Yeah, I'm not a believer (that the system will give more AFL opportunities to SANFL standouts)." _The Bunyip Newspaper.
So, was there a vote? If so, who voted and what was their vote? If it was all the SANFL clubs and if a majority voted against it, obviously they have no power. Greg Edwards "pretty strong" against it had no impact. Who came up with the concessions? Why would the committee come up with the concessions and then a committee member vote against it? If Greg Edwards didn't believe in the concessions why not say that to members? Given so many real SANFL followers didn't believe there was a need for any concessions, why did they give them concessions and why so generous?
Where's the transparency from the SANFL??? Who wanted these concessions and who will truly benefit (what individuals) from them getting in (I imagine Olsen, Kelly and Davies now at the AFL clubs approve)?
wenchbarwer
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4319
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2021 1:00 pm
Team: West Adelaide
Team: Essendon
Has thanked: 2021 times
Been thanked: 977 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by wenchbarwer »

Long story short, AFL money is the answer to all your questions
my yes be yes, my no be no
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

wenchbarwer wrote:Long story short, AFL money is the answer to all your questions


Yes, sadly true but let them say that.

In the SANFL 2023 Annual report it states, "We would like to acknowledge the AFL for increasing funding for Game Development back to pre-Covid-19 levels and we look forward to further strategic investment in the coming years". So, if the SANFL or SANFL clubs said, "no we don't believe the AFL reserves need any further concessions, and they won't be implemented". Does the AFL say, no "David Koch says they do, so this is what it will be, or we'll cut funding or not increase it". If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity. Or just say, okay they'll no longer be in the SANFL and the AFL club or AFL can fund them in a reserves comp.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Booney »

Dogs64 wrote:If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity.


You jest. Surely.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Hazydog
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1343
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 10:32 pm
Team: Central District
Location: Paralowie
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Hazydog »

Booney wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity.


You jest. Surely.


Why not? Worked well for Koch…
Players win touches, Teams win matches, Clubs win Premierships.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
Posts: 64099
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:17 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Location: Alberton proud
Has thanked: 8790 times
Been thanked: 12735 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Booney »

Hazydog wrote:
Booney wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity.


You jest. Surely.


Why not? Worked well for Koch…


They could only hope for someone like Koch at the SANFuL.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Dogs64 »

Booney wrote:
Hazydog wrote:
Booney wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity.


You jest. Surely.


Why not? Worked well for Koch…


They could only hope for someone like Koch at the SANFuL.


It seems like they have.
MJP1993
Under 18s
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:34 am
Team: Eagles
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 470 times
Been thanked: 56 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by MJP1993 »

Booney wrote:
Hazydog wrote:
Booney wrote:
Dogs64 wrote:If so, publicise the "ransom", the cost of the SANFL integrity.


You jest. Surely.


Why not? Worked well for Koch…


They could only hope for someone like Koch at the SANFuL.


No offence Booney Koch is the biggest embarrassment at port Adelaide he moans and complains gets fined gets his way .
Suddenly he lands a job at SA Tourism but doesn’t live here .
Something smells off here’s but what do I know I’m only a disabled eagles fan :)
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by dedja »

He’s not the only embarrassment.
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
gazzamagoo

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by gazzamagoo »

Interesting message to all supporters from the CEO of the CDFC, in respect to the concessions handed to the interlopers.

The last time I wrote to our members was to lay out the new recruiting regulations provided by SANFL to PAFC and AFC. Let’s say the response back to this CEO wasn’t too flattering, but in this job, one of the pre-requisites is having thick skin!
I’ve always thought providing as much information to members was very important, even if it was news that would be controversial or potentially not supported by our members.
Being on the large working group for that process was interesting, and for those who felt like I’d abandoned them, no I didn’t support the concessions handed to the AFL Clubs,
our club’s stance was a long way removed from the final concessions offered.
But, enough of that, we move on and get going again for 2025!
User avatar
dedja
Coach
Posts: 26497
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:40 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2072 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by dedja »

That’s a very strange message … why didn’t he outline what the club’s stance was instead of pretending he agreed with the decisions until he realised supporters thought it stunk?
Dunno, I’m just an idiot.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 255 guests