SANFL 2020 Season

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
UK Fan
Coach
Posts: 6366
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:41 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 1374 times
Been thanked: 602 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by UK Fan »

SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
whufc
Coach
Posts: 29217
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:56 am
Team: Central District
Team: BSR
Location: Blakeview
Has thanked: 6065 times
Been thanked: 2933 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by whufc »

UK Fan wrote:SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.


What were reserves players getting prior to Covid?
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by bulldogproud »

*
Last edited by bulldogproud on Fri Aug 14, 2020 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
topshelf
Rookie
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:52 pm
Team: Glenelg
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 44 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by topshelf »

UK Fan wrote:SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.



It was $380k in 2019 wasn't it?

Personally i think they should've scrapped the Reserves, have smaller senior list sizes (30-32 players max), have up to five or six players play in the u/18s and the rest go back to local footy if they're available and not selected in either but i guess playing for nothing is another option. Hopefully we can keep as much talent as we can but that is a big drop in pay for the senior list.
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by bulldogproud »

topshelf wrote:
UK Fan wrote:SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.



It was $380k in 2019 wasn't it?

Personally i think they should've scrapped the Reserves, have smaller senior list sizes (30-32 players max), have up to five or six players play in the u/18s and the rest go back to local footy if they're available and not selected in either but i guess playing for nothing is another option. Hopefully we can keep as much talent as we can but that is a big drop in pay for the senior list.


$380k for seven of the ten clubs; over a million for two of the clubs, and whatever they could fit into brown paper bags for the other club ;)
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
daysofourlives
Coach
Posts: 12082
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Hawthorn
Team: Angaston
Has thanked: 2691 times
Been thanked: 1788 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by daysofourlives »

UK Fan wrote:SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.


This will hurt the SANFL alot, more players will go to the country and ammos.
It wont matter what they set the salary cap at in community football, we know its highly unlikely its adhered to.
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
Dogs64
Under 18s
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2018 9:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 435 times
Been thanked: 266 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Dogs64 »

Agreed, this is disastrous for the league. A cap the equivalent of one average AFL player salary. Surely dictated by the afl to ensure the sanfl is not more attractive for players than the VFL? If so why do the SANFL always fold to AFL whims. Get Roy Laird in to put the sanfl first.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Wedgie »

South beat West comfortably in the Prelim to set up a North v South Grand Final in the Women's comp, should be a ripper, clearly the 2 best sides over a long period.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Spargo
Coach
Posts: 17680
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: North Melbourne
Team: Sacred Heart OC
Location: Getting out of Dodge
Has thanked: 6417 times
Been thanked: 5688 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Spargo »

Premiership odds after Round 8:

$2.75 Woodville West Torrens
$3.25 North Adelaide
$5.00 Glenelg
$5.50 South Adelaide
$9.00 Norwood
$34 Sturt
2017 safooty NFL tipping champ
2024 champ, Spargo’s Good Friday Cup @ Ascot

Time to get moving…
bulldogproud
League - Top 5
Posts: 3113
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:02 am
Team: Central District
Team: Western Bulldogs
Team: Imperials
Location: West Beach
Has thanked: 489 times
Been thanked: 401 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by bulldogproud »

Spargo wrote:Premiership odds after Round 8:

$2.75 Woodville West Torrens
$3.25 North Adelaide
$5.00 Glenelg
$5.50 South Adelaide
$9.00 Norwood
$34 Sturt


South look good value at those odds.
A Bulldog in winter; a WTDCC Eagle and OICC Wolf in Summer!
gazzamagoo

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by gazzamagoo »

bulldogproud wrote:
Spargo wrote:Premiership odds after Round 8:

$2.75 Woodville West Torrens
$3.25 North Adelaide
$5.00 Glenelg
$5.50 South Adelaide
$9.00 Norwood
$34 Sturt


South look good value at those odds.

Norwood are better.
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:03 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1136 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Jim05 »

gazzamagoo wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:
Spargo wrote:Premiership odds after Round 8:

$2.75 Woodville West Torrens
$3.25 North Adelaide
$5.00 Glenelg
$5.50 South Adelaide
$9.00 Norwood
$34 Sturt


South look good value at those odds.

Norwood are better.
Lol, South is the only side above us we have beaten.
North and the Eagles in our next 2 games and if we don’t win at least one the season is over
Mr Fuller
Reserves
Posts: 881
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:16 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 135 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Mr Fuller »

Jim05 wrote:
gazzamagoo wrote:
bulldogproud wrote:
Spargo wrote:Premiership odds after Round 8:

$2.75 Woodville West Torrens
$3.25 North Adelaide
$5.00 Glenelg
$5.50 South Adelaide
$9.00 Norwood
$34 Sturt


South look good value at those odds.

Norwood are better.
Lol, South is the only side above us we have beaten.
North and the Eagles in our next 2 games and if we don’t win at least one the season is over


I think Norwood have one of best player lists in the competition. For whatever reason they just haven't been playing attractive footy. Should they get it together then they have the potential to string together multiple wins against all the top teams in the competition. This is why I wouldn't discount them. I would have thought $9 are great odds.
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Hahndorf
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 405 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Psyber »

I must admit I'm losing interest fast this year.
The SANFL website is less easy to find current information on than in the recent past.
The Norwood website is never up to date, and Norwood look hopeless and unfit.
AFL is also down the tube - Crows and website style.

(I don't get the current trend with the websites - more gimmickry and videos but harder to find basic information quickly.)
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12494
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:11 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Pseudo »

Psyber wrote:(I don't get the current trend with the websites - more gimmickry and videos but harder to find basic information quickly.)

^ this, many times over.
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
Posts: 20533
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Team: Glenelg
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has thanked: 192 times
Been thanked: 2324 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by am Bays »

Pseudo wrote:
Psyber wrote:(I don't get the current trend with the websites - more gimmickry and videos but harder to find basic information quickly.)

^ this, many times over.


I'd insert Abe Simpson meme here, if I wasn't so inept at websites and IT....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
Posts: 51723
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:00 am
Team: North Adelaide
Team: Geelong
Team: Noarlunga
Has thanked: 2153 times
Been thanked: 4093 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Wedgie »

Pseudo wrote:
Psyber wrote:(I don't get the current trend with the websites - more gimmickry and videos but harder to find basic information quickly.)

^ this, many times over.

Yep, frustrated me many times over even when I was creating/running my own websites the way they were heading.
Give me something more practical anyday.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
JK
Coach
Posts: 37469
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:11 am
Team: Norwood
Team: SMOSH West Lakes
Location: Coopers Hill
Has thanked: 4509 times
Been thanked: 3028 times
Contact:

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by JK »

bulldogproud wrote:
topshelf wrote:
UK Fan wrote:SANFL salary cap to be reduced to $250k next season

Reserves to stay but to play for zero.



It was $380k in 2019 wasn't it?

Personally i think they should've scrapped the Reserves, have smaller senior list sizes (30-32 players max), have up to five or six players play in the u/18s and the rest go back to local footy if they're available and not selected in either but i guess playing for nothing is another option. Hopefully we can keep as much talent as we can but that is a big drop in pay for the senior list.


$380k for seven of the ten clubs; over a million for two of the clubs, and whatever they could fit into brown paper bags for the other club ;)


2005 Norwood were on the bones of their ass and coming off a wooden spoon whilst you guys were flush and in the midst of the competitions greatest ever winning spree. Don’t recall much complaining back in that decade so maybe suck it up Mary
FUSC
Brett
League Bench Warmer
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:37 pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by Brett »

I think a 2021 season topic should be introduced. That is going to very interesting.

Why would anyone want no Reserves ? That is ruining the game even more .

The whole structure of footy is wrong IMO and has been for years. Once the so called AFL was introduced it should have changed and changed to make footy better. But as we all know its was about saving Vic clubs and back door deal with Port.
It should be now an AFL comp and with less teams. ( we all know that). Lists should be reduced and the drafted age lifted to 20 . That simply strengthens the state leagues and doesn't lose players after being swallowed up in a horrible system.
I dont want AFL reserves in . They add nothing. But if the Power and Crows want to join then the SANFL either says no or demand a huge licence fee. Im sure the AFL would have nowhere to go on that .
User avatar
LMA
Coach
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:37 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Magpies
Team: Port Adelaide Power
Team: Port District
Has thanked: 387 times
Been thanked: 714 times

Re: SANFL 2020 Season

Post by LMA »

Brett wrote:I think a 2021 season topic should be introduced. That is going to very interesting.

Why would anyone want no Reserves ? That is ruining the game even more .

The whole structure of footy is wrong IMO and has been for years. Once the so called AFL was introduced it should have changed and changed to make footy better. But as we all know its was about saving Vic clubs and back door deal with Port.
It should be now an AFL comp and with less teams. ( we all know that). Lists should be reduced and the drafted age lifted to 20 . That simply strengthens the state leagues and doesn't lose players after being swallowed up in a horrible system.
I dont want AFL reserves in . They add nothing. But if the Power and Crows want to join then the SANFL either says no or demand a huge licence fee. Im sure the AFL would have nowhere to go on that .


unnamed (6).gif
unnamed (6).gif (245.73 KiB) Viewed 4574 times
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MannyK and 319 guests