by bayman » Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:55 pm
by G » Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:05 pm
by kingrooster » Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:08 pm
by Ecky » Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:13 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Ian » Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:00 pm
bayman wrote:there is a poll concurrently conducted on the sanfl site regarding the 'rising stars' which i found out on snouts to 'support jack' which i thought yeah why not & as i logged on to the sanfl & read the names & criterior, i thought no there are better players on that list than him so i voted for greenwood but here is a list of those i think should be up there & to me it is baffling & i smell a rat
votes...............name of player...................%ages
46...................summerton..........................2%
24....................greenwood.........................1%
3......................aish..................................0%
0......................salter................................0%
804...................wundke.............................38%
now i would not argue with wundke winning it but i would strongly argue that he should not be that far in front it is too much a descrepancy & that is the big smelly rat(s) i smell, i bet you next year the public will not get a vote on it after this
total votes at this stage is 2,144
by BigRed42 » Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:09 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Ecky » Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:36 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by sturt1 » Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:42 pm
by smac » Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:44 pm
sturt1 wrote:Its not australian idol
by Mr66 » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:00 pm
kingrooster wrote:It seems to be a 1 vote per computer per day situation. So I guess you can vote for who you like once a day until it closes. Therefore it is really only a popularity contest rather than a reflection on actual performance.
by smac » Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:06 pm
Mr66 wrote:kingrooster wrote:It seems to be a 1 vote per computer per day situation. So I guess you can vote for who you like once a day until it closes. Therefore it is really only a popularity contest rather than a reflection on actual performance.
Totally off the subject.
Kingrooster, Second best avatar ever.
by Mr66 » Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:29 pm
smac wrote:Mr66 wrote:kingrooster wrote:It seems to be a 1 vote per computer per day situation. So I guess you can vote for who you like once a day until it closes. Therefore it is really only a popularity contest rather than a reflection on actual performance.
Totally off the subject.
Kingrooster, Second best avatar ever.
You need to get over the regional boards more then Mr 66! Some corkers over there.
by eddie-eagle » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:12 am
Mr66 wrote:kingrooster wrote:It seems to be a 1 vote per computer per day situation. So I guess you can vote for who you like once a day until it closes. Therefore it is really only a popularity contest rather than a reflection on actual performance.
Totally off the subject.
Kingrooster, Second best avatar ever.
by JAS » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:27 am
eddie-eagle wrote:Mr66 wrote:kingrooster wrote:It seems to be a 1 vote per computer per day situation. So I guess you can vote for who you like once a day until it closes. Therefore it is really only a popularity contest rather than a reflection on actual performance.
Totally off the subject.
Kingrooster, Second best avatar ever.
Behind blacky, I agree re avatars. Manuel told me that no rat........ he basil.
by MightyEagles » Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:33 am
sturt1 wrote:Its not australian idol
by Brad » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:37 pm
by bayman » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:25 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |