ATCA

[Tony Clifton]

You'd reckon this'll test the ATCA social media policy with what's being said online. The brothers might have a holiday coming up.

It wasn't an ATCA competition was it?

[thevoice]

You'd reckon this'll test the ATCA social media policy with what's being said online. The brothers might have a holiday coming up.

It wasn't an ATCA competition was it?

Representing ATCA so I'd imagine it's relevant.

[Lightning McQueen]

Representing ATCA so I'd imagine it's relevant.

They probably agree with it all, the umpire put himself above the law, purely disgraceful and is a blight on the comp.

[Booney]

The law relating to penalty runs, doesn't it need a warning to be given before a 5 run penalty is awarded?

[caleb777]

The law relating to penalty runs, doesn't it need a warning to be given before a 5 run penalty is awarded?

There were a number of close run outs given not out which were all safe. A caught behind appeal was adjudged not out and a para hills bowler allegedly kicked the stumps down. You dont deserve a warning when you kick the stumps down IMO.

[Booney]

The law relating to penalty runs, doesn't it need a warning to be given before a 5 run penalty is awarded?

There were a number of close run outs given not out which were all safe. A caught behind appeal was adjudged not out and a para hills bowler allegedly kicked the stumps down. You dont deserve a warning when you kick the stumps down IMO.

If that's what occurred then I have no problem with the penalty.

[The_Observant_One]

Take Caleb's comments with a grain of salt, he's originally from the Ramblers and is about as one eyed as they come.

Not saying what he has said is incorrect but generally speaking if a Ramblers player had kicked the stumps, he'd find a way to blame it on the oppositions scorer

[Dutchy]

The law relating to penalty runs, doesn't it need a warning to be given before a 5 run penalty is awarded?

There were a number of close run outs given not out which were all safe. A caught behind appeal was adjudged not out and a para hills bowler allegedly kicked the stumps down. You dont deserve a warning when you kick the stumps down IMO.

If that's what occurred then I have no problem with the penalty.

Agree, ironically I was scoring my son's semi final yesterday and a ball hit a helmet that was sitting behind the keeper, umpire correctly gave 5 runs to the batting team, had no idea how to record it in the book other than make a seperate entry under Sundries.

Played nearly 40 years of cricket and still see something you haven't come across before.

[The Bedge]

Isn’t there a row called “penalty runs” in the sundries area below no balls?

[caleb777]

Take Caleb's comments with a grain of salt, he's originally from the Ramblers and is about as one eyed as they come.

Not saying what he has said is incorrect but generally speaking if a Ramblers player had kicked the stumps, he'd find a way to blame it on the oppositions scorer

Lol. All this hate towards the Ramblers is hilarious. Im just going on what i was told and if you do read the comment I do say "allegedly", hardly one eyed champ.

[Booney]

Take Caleb's comments with a grain of salt, he's originally from the Ramblers and is about as one eyed as they come.

Not saying what he has said is incorrect but generally speaking if a Ramblers player had kicked the stumps, he'd find a way to blame it on the oppositions scorer

Lol. All this hate towards the Ramblers is hilarious. Im just going on what i was told and if you do read the comment I do say "allegedly", hardly one eyed champ.

I may well have played against caleb, I wouldn't be doing either Coro side any favors mate.

You say "allegedly" I say "If that's what happened" you cop a whack.

[Dutchy]

Isn’t there a row called “penalty runs” in the sundries area below no balls?

Not in the scorebook I was using, we made our own anyway.

Another irony is it was Coro Ramblers u16's that received the 5 runs

[Harry49]

No stumps were kicked down. The 5 run penalty was for swearing at the umpire

[Tony Clifton]

No stumps were kicked down. The 5 run penalty was for swearing at the umpire

Is that a rule?

How do umpires determine what is a runs penalty and what is a report? Would seem dangerously subjective.

[Senor Moto Gadili]

No stumps were kicked down. The 5 run penalty was for swearing at the umpire

Is that a rule?

How do umpires determine what is a runs penalty and what is a report? Would seem dangerously subjective.

Yes, it's a rule in ATCA, but not sure if it applies to SAMCA games. Obviously the umpire thoight it did. In ATCA, the use of the 5 run penalty should be preceded by a first and final warning, which could involve a player being put on report. Any furtber indiscretions would incur a 5 run penalty.

[Keefy]

Isn’t there a row called “penalty runs” in the sundries area below no balls?

Not in the scorebook I was using, we made our own anyway.

Another irony is it was Coro Ramblers u16's that received the 5 runs

Took the umpires a moment to work out what happened too

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[The Old Fellow]

No stumps were kicked down. The 5 run penalty was for swearing at the umpire

Is that a rule?

How do umpires determine what is a runs penalty and what is a report? Would seem dangerously subjective.

Yes, it's a rule in ATCA, but not sure if it applies to SAMCA games. Obviously the umpire thoight it did. In ATCA, the use of the 5 run penalty should be preceded by a first and final warning, which could involve a player being put on report. Any furtber indiscretions would incur a 5 run penalty.

It is a law of cricket, law 42. There are 4 levels, the first is warning for minor unacceptable conduct and any further minor infringement is 5 penalty runs. Level are slightly more serious unacceptable conduct and penalty runs are awarded without any warning. The third is that a player is sent off for a period of time and level 4 is goodbye, no more involvement in the match. Any level can be a report.

[Senor Moto Gadili]

No stumps were kicked down. The 5 run penalty was for swearing at the umpire

Is that a rule?

How do umpires determine what is a runs penalty and what is a report? Would seem dangerously subjective.

Yes, it's a rule in ATCA, but not sure if it applies to SAMCA games. Obviously the umpire thoight it did. In ATCA, the use of the 5 run penalty should be preceded by a first and final warning, which could involve a player being put on report. Any furtber indiscretions would incur a 5 run penalty.

It is a law of cricket, law 42. There are 4 levels, the first is warning for minor unacceptable conduct and any further minor infringement is 5 penalty runs. Level are slightly more serious unacceptable conduct and penalty runs are awarded without any warning. The third is that a player is sent off for a period of time and level 4 is goodbye, no more involvement in the match. Any level can be a report.

ATCA have bylaw D32 which acts in lieu of Law 42. Given this was a SAMCA game, you can only assume Law 42 has been applied correctly if the Para Hills player swore at the umpire. Lucky he wasn't sent off.

[Booney]

"Get ****** ******* hell ****"

"Easy, settle down, enough"

"Get ****** ******* shit **** ****"

"-5 runs"

That a fair assessment?

[Senor Moto Gadili]

"Get ****** ******* hell ****"

"Easy, settle down, enough"

"Get ****** ******* shit **** ****"

"-5 runs"

That a fair assessment?

I'm sure @Harry49 can fill in the blanks for us. Other than that the 5 runs are added to the oppositions score not deducted from the offending team's score