spell_check wrote:Wedgie wrote:spell_check wrote:It didn't matter today either, nor on any other day. I say it the "stat that matters" because you think that's the indicator to who gets a better run.
Agreed but 3-2 is minimal where 5 nil is major.
60% versus 100%.
Apologies if the Tigers got a decent run in the first quarter and a half when I wasn't there but from a non biased point of view there was some shockers against them in the last half that would have made 2-4 goals difference.
You seem to have an issue with my assessment of the umpires but you don't seem to have an issue with the poster who brought up the umpiring today namely an Eagles supporter, don't be a hypocrite spelly, I like you too much!

I don't know if mickyj is saying that he thought that both sides had some lucky frees, or just Glenelg.
My view of umpires affecting matches is exactly like Dutchy - just forget about a decision which you thought may have been harsh on your team, because you'll enjoy the game more.
Mickyj is just stating that the three umpires had a bad day with the holding the ball rule .Thats all and at the end of the game the result was ok .Because both teams had lapses in concentration if you had been there in the first quater Eagles goal kicking was shocking:roll: .
What really turned the game .Well IMHO the bays killed the EAGLES at stoppages and midfield bounces before the last quarter.
In the last quarter Ron made a couple of midfield changes like maca and stewart did they help eagles not sure .But what really turned the game in the EAGLES favour IMHO was getting the ball into the forwardline before the bays could flood back.
Thus letting the likes of Schwarze to mark the ball and kick goals. Vince to bounce goals through. Oh and Grocke to play like he was before he got injured up the ground and holding marks.