by Thiele » Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:34 pm
by sydney-dog » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:03 pm
by hearts on fire » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:04 pm
sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
by Pup » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:07 pm
sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
by NFC » Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:50 pm
sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
by GWW » Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:16 pm
hearts on fire wrote:sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
Carlton will still do s***t with good draft picks or crap draft picks.
It doesn't matter, Carlton will always be s***t. (at least for the next 10-15 years)
by spell_check » Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:49 pm
GWW wrote:hearts on fire wrote:sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
Carlton will still do s***t with good draft picks or crap draft picks.
It doesn't matter, Carlton will always be s***t. (at least for the next 10-15 years)
Its not only that Carlton get the number 1 pick (and 2 top 3 picks), its also that other clubs who do the right thing with their administration and player development, go down the order by 1 for each pick.
I agree absolutely with SD, there is no incentive whatsoever for Carlton to win, and its a disgrace that Demetriou wont look at it the way the majority of football fans do.
by saintal » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:07 pm
by sydney-dog » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:08 pm
by Psyber » Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:15 pm
saintal wrote:I never thought i'd say this but 'C'mon the pies'
by Tight_Lines » Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:26 pm
by JK » Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:49 pm
Psyber wrote:saintal wrote:I never thought i'd say this but 'C'mon the pies'
The Saints are gone and justice is served. I never thought I'd support the West Coast Illeagles, but all those sneaky kidney, rib, and gut punches, I saw on TV made me realise why I had never felt good about the Saints. Brisbane are the only other team I have seen employ this as a standard and constant tactic.
I guess it confirms that what happened the previous week is team policy, and not one guy going crackerdog for the day.
by Dirko » Mon Aug 27, 2007 2:15 pm
hearts on fire wrote:sydney-dog wrote:if Richmond beat the Saints next week and Carlton lose to Melbourne, Carlton will receive the first two draft picks
my question, is their incentive for Carlton to win?
is this good for footy, my view, the League should look at a lottery system such as the NBA
Carlton will still do s***t with good draft picks or crap draft picks.
It doesn't matter, Carlton will always be s***t. (at least for the next 10-15 years)
by hearts on fire » Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:36 pm
by Dirko » Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:40 pm
hearts on fire wrote:Carlton may get to 12th in the next 10-15 years but none higher than that. Carlton dont want to risk losing good draft picks
by smac » Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:43 pm
hearts on fire wrote:Carlton may get to 12th in the next 10-15 years but none higher than that. Carlton dont want to risk losing good draft picks
by Macca19 » Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:10 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:33 pm
Macca19 wrote:For Port to finish 2nd, they have to basically match the margin of what West Coast might beat Essendon by. THe margin for error is about 2 points.
So if West Coast beat Essendon by 48 points....then depending on the total scores, Port will have to beat Freo by at least 46 points to get into 2nd spot and secure two home finals.
Gonna be a crazy day on Saturday. Given the result of the West Coast match will be known before the Power game starts...Port will know exactly what they have to do. Will Freo tank just to piss West Coast off?
by McAlmanac » Mon Aug 27, 2007 6:45 pm
hearts on fire wrote:i don't think Fremantle will do that, I think they would prefer to see West Coast finish 2nd. I also think they don't care about West Coast or Port and they will go out and try and win...........
by Psyber » Mon Aug 27, 2007 8:04 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Psyber wrote:saintal wrote:I never thought i'd say this but 'C'mon the pies'
The Saints are gone and justice is served. I never thought I'd support the West Coast Illeagles, but all those sneaky kidney, rib, and gut punches, I saw on TV made me realise why I had never felt good about the Saints. Brisbane are the only other team I have seen employ this as a standard and constant tactic.
I guess it confirms that what happened the previous week is team policy, and not one guy going crackerdog for the day.
Wouldn't be writing the Saints off yet mate, they should account for Richmond comfortably and I'd rate the Crows as slight underdogs against Collingwood.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |