by bulldogproud » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:22 pm
by Eagles2014 » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:30 pm
Aerie wrote:How did Glenelg pull off adjusting the date of their semi and therefore the final at the last minute? Do they run the show?
Now the final won't feature any Redbacks players as a Shield game is on and Glenelg get the added bonus of having Sayers and Carey playing for them against Tea Tree Gully in the Semi-Final, who presumably won't have Head as he's playing T20 for Australia.
by Aerie » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:37 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:Aerie wrote:How did Glenelg pull off adjusting the date of their semi and therefore the final at the last minute? Do they run the show?
Now the final won't feature any Redbacks players as a Shield game is on and Glenelg get the added bonus of having Sayers and Carey playing for them against Tea Tree Gully in the Semi-Final, who presumably won't have Head as he's playing T20 for Australia.
Careful Aerie, you will upset the Glenelg Supporters on here like "The Hound" and "back of the room"!!
It is a disgrace, if I was TTG I would be spewing, they now get Sayers and Carey to contend with, swings the game massively in their favour. Don't know why all Clubs got to vote on this, but the other three Clubs still involved in semis (Port, TTG and WT) all voted no, all other teams voted Yes, they did not give a crap. Too much power with Snewin from Bays in charge of Grade Committee.
The date was set, should of played at Park 25 if they could not provide oval. Makes a mockery of comp yet again when they change rules as they go.
by Eagles2014 » Sun Feb 12, 2017 9:55 pm
by Tony Clifton » Sun Feb 12, 2017 11:04 pm
by Eagles2014 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:00 am
Tony Clifton wrote:Wouldn't it have been awesome for the club function to have a semi final being played on the oval for everyone to watch?
by heater31 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:02 am
Aerie wrote:How did Glenelg pull off adjusting the date of their semi and therefore the final at the last minute? Do they run the show?
Now the final won't feature any Redbacks players as a Shield game is on and Glenelg get the added bonus of having Sayers and Carey playing for them against Tea Tree Gully in the Semi-Final, who presumably won't have Head as he's playing T20 for Australia.
by human_torpedo » Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:40 am
by The Hound » Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:32 am
by ferret » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:48 pm
by bulldogproud » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:48 pm
The Hound wrote:The Hound is not upset , went to a vote three against the rest for.
Unfortunately the weather intervened the week before!
250 club not 100 club
Park 25 used for State Under 15 trial yesterday and also Special Olympics games so out of the equation, #3 roped off, Railways unable to be accessed due to redevelopment starting.
Before the WT posters start having a go at the Bays find out which club stepped up to the plate to assist your overseas spinner after his accommodation issues
by bulldogproud » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:48 pm
by The Hound » Tue Feb 14, 2017 10:22 am
by Eagles2014 » Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:45 am
The Hound wrote:Would of thought the integrity of the competition is in question with some teams getting 1 day byes and some getting 2 day byes. Forfeits at senior level over the past couple of years, and also allowing players from other clubs to play in junior competitions when their club doesn't have juniors. What about some clubs using hard wicket at 16's level, they get a result everyone else gets washed out. Also 6 sides are not playing in the 16 whites this round!, 3 sides forfeiting
by bulldogproud » Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:05 pm
The Hound wrote:Would of thought the integrity of the competition is in question with some teams getting 1 day byes and some getting 2 day byes. Forfeits at senior level over the past couple of years, and also allowing players from other clubs to play in junior competitions when their club doesn't have juniors. What about some clubs using hard wicket at 16's level, they get a result everyone else gets washed out. Also 6 sides are not playing in the 16 whites this round!, 3 sides forfeiting
by backoftheroom » Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:05 pm
by The Hound » Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:52 pm
by Eagles2014 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:58 am
by heater31 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:02 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:06 am
Eagles2014 wrote:Interesting article in this week's Messenger re SACA Under 19 team coming into 1st Grade comp.
Of all the Clubs spoken too, only two thought it was a good idea.
Naturally, Adelaide Uni were for it as they have no Juniors and it will not impact on them, surprise, surprise.
Also, Woodville agreed, but they have hardly developed any good juniors over the years, they just go pinching them from other Clubs, so wont affect them much either. (Sam McNally will no doubt be busy on the phone in the off season as per usual - that's if he still has the job).
Some great comments from Weaver and Brown too, pity SACA don't listen to guys like this that have over 10 years experience in the Comp and make a lot of sense with what they say.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |