Brodlach wrote:carey wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit
Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes
I'd prefer Eddie to Dawes
As in McGuire??
Well Yes, Ed would give us more....
Brodlach wrote:carey wrote:Dutchy wrote:MW wrote:Probably not cause Dawes is shit
Brett Eddy according to Kane Cornes
I'd prefer Eddie to Dawes
As in McGuire??
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
heater31 wrote:I don't get it. The give the arse to 2 forwards who have been at the club for a while to potentially bring in a 27 year old who has never been on an AFL list!
heater31 wrote:I don't get it. The give the arse to 2 forwards who have been at the club for a while to potentially bring in a 27 year old who has never been on an AFL list!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
UK Fan wrote:What's the odds on Hinkley first coach sacked this season ??
Lightning McQueen wrote:UK Fan wrote:What's the odds on Hinkley first coach sacked this season ??
Not really a hard equation, you would think 13 coaches are as safe as houses with probably 5 under pressure to deliver.
Buckley
Hinkley
Hardwick
Lyon
B.Scott
MW wrote:I think Buckley and Hardwick nose to nose. Collingwood miss the eight, then Bucks gone, probably the same for Hardwick.
Spargo wrote:MW wrote:I think Buckley and Hardwick nose to nose. Collingwood miss the eight, then Bucks gone, probably the same for Hardwick.
Surely the same applies for Hinkley?
Spargo wrote:MW wrote:I think Buckley and Hardwick nose to nose. Collingwood miss the eight, then Bucks gone, probably the same for Hardwick.
Surely the same applies for Hinkley?
Booney wrote:Spargo wrote:MW wrote:I think Buckley and Hardwick nose to nose. Collingwood miss the eight, then Bucks gone, probably the same for Hardwick.
Surely the same applies for Hinkley?
Hinkley will be given some leeway for 2016, suspension and injuries played a big part in our season.
A repeat of '16 in '17 and he'll be on borrowed time.
Buckley ( 53.5 win % ) has had 5 year with no return, 16,14,11,10,9 wins in his time. Hardwick (47.1 win %) is going into his 8th year with nothing more than a loss in 1st week of finals 3 times.
They've had longer, with more resources* for less return than Hinkley ( 54.8 win % ).
*Remember where Port was at when Hinkley took over.
MW wrote:Spargo wrote:MW wrote:I think Buckley and Hardwick nose to nose. Collingwood miss the eight, then Bucks gone, probably the same for Hardwick.
Surely the same applies for Hinkley?
Depends if they get one long term injury or suspension, then its ok to blame that for the years performance
Dutchy wrote:Scott has had the Roos one win from the GF twice in the last 3 years, think there is some credits there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 217 guests