by wassprinttospace » Tue May 10, 2016 2:35 pm
by Mr Beefy » Tue May 10, 2016 2:54 pm
wassprinttospace wrote:Seems we can not beat Rosewater at home in the first half of the season Beefy, 2014, 2015, 2016, although the margin is getting closer ...
by wassprinttospace » Tue May 10, 2016 3:41 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:wassprinttospace wrote:Seems we can not beat Rosewater at home in the first half of the season Beefy, 2014, 2015, 2016, although the margin is getting closer ...
Perhaps it's the time of the year because we also knocked you off in R6 2013.
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 1:13 pm
Zartan wrote:They created a new registration in SportingPulse - only adjusted the date of birth, so it could go through.
Definitely the same person, have known he's been playing all year, and I saw him Saturday and spoke to him, and he confirmed it.
No excuses - coach is a former Ingle Farm coach, he knows he would need a clearance and that he last played at Ingle Farm.. A quick search of SportingPulse would've shown it up too.
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 1:24 pm
bloodhound wrote:seems most players I talk to at CBC say they want to play B or C Grade,.........but most of them answer the call
by The Bedge » Wed May 11, 2016 1:30 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan I think u have it wrong. Ingle farm had his date of birth wrong in sporting pulse so when CBC registered him with his correct dob the system didn't pick up he needed a clearance.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Wed May 11, 2016 1:40 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Mr Beefy » Wed May 11, 2016 1:41 pm
Zartan wrote:Guess it doesn't matter now anyway, hasn't stopped CBCOC playing him despite clearance still pending - even against his former club, and the SAAFL obviously have allowed it because they still sit equal top on 10 points..
by The Bedge » Wed May 11, 2016 1:52 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Zartan wrote:Guess it doesn't matter now anyway, hasn't stopped CBCOC playing him despite clearance still pending - even against his former club, and the SAAFL obviously have allowed it because they still sit equal top on 10 points..
Have Ingle Farm made a formal complaint?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Wed May 11, 2016 1:53 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 2:13 pm
Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
by Inallseriousness » Wed May 11, 2016 2:29 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
by S Demon » Wed May 11, 2016 2:30 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
by SATCHEL » Wed May 11, 2016 2:33 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 2:36 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
So what was the motivation to play him against IF, AFTER being advised that he was not cleared before the game? Surely that is intent?
by The Bedge » Wed May 11, 2016 2:37 pm
Not play him lol - pretty simpleDolphin Treasure wrote:Your clutching at straws here..... Sporting pulse says he's registered to CBC, IF ring up & say he's not registered.... What would u do?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Mr Beefy » Wed May 11, 2016 2:42 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Inallseriousness wrote:Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
So what was the motivation to play him against IF, AFTER being advised that he was not cleared before the game? Surely that is intent?
Your clutching at straws here..... Sporting pulse says he's registered to CBC, IF ring up & say he's not registered.... What would u do?
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 2:47 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Dolphin Treasure wrote:Zartan wrote:Rules for some and not for others it would seem..
Of course u don't buy it. What on earth would b CBC's motivation for playing a C grader unregistered? Why would we make up a fake registration to play him? Look someone has obviously made a mistake here, is it worth taking 5 wins away from the c grade? No. There is no malice or intent here.
A few years ago i came up against the same thing with my old club. You do the best due diligence you can but you can only go by what that player said. We ended up losing points for a player that wrote his details incorrectly on his clearance forms. It was brought up by another club in another division as that's where he played. If the rule has been broken then of course the penalty should fit that error. There was thought that our A grade at the time would lose points but that didn't eventuate. No matter what way you look at it and from what the league told us at the time. Doesn't matter how or why it happened, the rule was broken and the penalty was and should be made. Comes down to interpretation and correct implementation of rulings/penalties. You would hope it doesn't come down to the club and who knows who elsewhere.
by Dolphin Treasure » Wed May 11, 2016 2:49 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed May 11, 2016 2:53 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:
How do u know that didn't happen?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |