JK wrote:Tweet from earlier in the year from the young lad the Crows rookied yesterday
Twit.
JK wrote:Tweet from earlier in the year from the young lad the Crows rookied yesterday
Booney wrote:valleys07 wrote:Tom Boyd.
"I went to the bulldogs chasing success".
Funny way of saying money...
Success = shit load of money in the bank.
bennymacca wrote:everyone would come out and call him a dick if he said yeah I'm doing it for the cash too. lose lose situation i think.
valleys07 wrote:bennymacca wrote:everyone would come out and call him a dick if he said yeah I'm doing it for the cash too. lose lose situation i think.
So just bite the lip and leave the cliche's.
Its clear he went for the cash- and it would make sense if he went to a top 4 side, but chasing success with a club that has won 1 flag in 90 years?
Come on Tom...
valleys07 wrote:Booney wrote:valleys07 wrote:Tom Boyd.
"I went to the bulldogs chasing success".
Funny way of saying money...
Success = shit load of money in the bank.
That interpretation makes sense.
No one can begrudge a 19 y.o accepting that sort of coin- just come out and say it, or shut up FFS!
shoe boy wrote:watching our PM give a lecture on trust and honesty ! WTF
nuggety goodness wrote:People that check themselves out in the reflection of the window before jumping on the train. Just had one lady giving herself the 'duck face'...
In fact there probably should be a sub thread of what makes you laugh on public transport, im sure there'd be plenty of stories...
It has cost $40,000 for every shared health summary currently in existence on the billion-dollar PCEHR system, a new report reveals. The system, which holds a grand total of seven specialist letters and six e-referrals, has been virtually moribund as the Federal Government embarks on the latest revamp to allow the uploading of pathology and diagnostic imaging results.
But the number crunching suggests doctors believe the system is clinically useless, despite the fact it's been running for two years and has cost in excess of a $1 billion.
The Consumers e-Health Alliance has published a review that shows there are just 26,332 shared e-health summaries uploaded to the PCEHR data repository. The summaries are widely seen as the minimum value component that list patients' diagnoses, medications and allergies.
Since the PCEHR system's launch in July 2012, some 288,000 clinical documents have been uploaded but only 71,100 were considered by the alliance review to be "potentially useful in a clinical sense".
This could explain why doctors have looked up a patient's record on the PCEHR on 26,100 different occasions — the equivalent of $38,000 a look.
Users browsing this forum: Lightning McQueen and 125 guests