Dutchy wrote:hondo71 wrote:That's fine ... I just don't want there to be any misconceptions that Brisbance & Sydney are the only clubs to have ever received assistance from the AFL and that Victorian clubs have been hard-done-by in comparison.
We both know which Victorian clubs have probably been the biggest financial drain on the AFL in recent times and yet, when presented with an option of finding new markets and the POTENTIAL to solve their financial problems, prefer to stay in Melbourne and continue to take money off the other clubs .... The extra $6.7m (minimum) going to the Bulldogs and the Roos is money that could have gone to grass-roots football.
fair dinkum if the Roos and Bullies didnt exist they would have that money to give them anyway
Brisbane and Sydney are the only teams to have received on-field assistance from the AFL...big difference
I am not sure about your theory there about the funding if they didn't exist but I agree the assistance the Bulldogs & Roos are getting is not the same as what Sydney & Brisbane got.
I also agree with you & Eddie that the AFL created a couple of power-houses by tinkering with the natural order of things 5-10 years ago. Just trying to make sure people realise Victorian clubs are already getting SOME $ assistance because this current debate often forgets that.
Eddie's point .... if it was wrong to do it before why do it again? 2 wrongs don't make a right and who'd want to see the Kangaroos have another dynasty
