Cash 123 wrote:Absolute disgrace by Uni and a shame on everyone involved at the club. If this report has a similar result as the last one did I hope the league penalise Uni for wasting everyones time.
Fair comment.
by Footy Chick » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:01 am
Cash 123 wrote:Absolute disgrace by Uni and a shame on everyone involved at the club. If this report has a similar result as the last one did I hope the league penalise Uni for wasting everyones time.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by SATCHEL » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:45 am
Footy Chick wrote:Cash 123 wrote:Absolute disgrace by Uni and a shame on everyone involved at the club. If this report has a similar result as the last one did I hope the league penalise Uni for wasting everyones time.
Fair comment.
by Executive Member » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:09 am
SATCHEL wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Cash 123 wrote:Absolute disgrace by Uni and a shame on everyone involved at the club. If this report has a similar result as the last one did I hope the league penalise Uni for wasting everyones time.
Fair comment.
With this whole video taping scenario. I ask this. If there is an under age player say 17 playing in the side. Should they team taping the game then ask permission to do so with all the laws on this? I know you cant just go taping this when there are underage children in view. Technical i know but "It's with the rules" of the law no matter what assocuiation your a part of.
by Mr Beefy » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:14 am
Executive Member wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Cash 123 wrote:Absolute disgrace by Uni and a shame on everyone involved at the club. If this report has a similar result as the last one did I hope the league penalise Uni for wasting everyones time.
Fair comment.
With this whole video taping scenario. I ask this. If there is an under age player say 17 playing in the side. Should they team taping the game then ask permission to do so with all the laws on this? I know you cant just go taping this when there are underage children in view. Technical i know but "It's with the rules" of the law no matter what assocuiation your a part of.
If there are under age players playing and the opposing team informs the team taping of this and that they want the taping to stop then they must do so
by teaoby » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:33 am
by Dols » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:48 am
by Cash 123 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:05 pm
teaoby wrote:I know half you blokes are arguing for arguments sake but really!?.....
Amateur teams have been filming games for years! eg. almost every GF played in the past 20years! pretty sure teams and/or league didn't get every underage person present to sign a waiver!
i have no issue with what Uni have done IF and only if it was out of view of the Umpire and it warrants a report. if it is like the one last time then agreed and they need to get over it!
by SATCHEL » Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:07 pm
teaoby wrote:I know half you blokes are arguing for arguments sake but really!?.....
Amateur teams have been filming games for years! eg. almost every GF played in the past 20years! pretty sure teams and/or league didn't get every underage person present to sign a waiver!
i have no issue with what Uni have done IF and only if it was out of view of the Umpire and it warrants a report. if it is like the one last time then agreed and they need to get over it!
by Footy Follower » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:38 pm
by finn » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:36 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Blacks130 wrote:Ah the hypocrisy of a narrow minded simpleton who uses the rules as the basis of his jibe and yet the manner in which the player has broken the rules is lost on him.NO-MERCY wrote:Must be a different rule for college teams, 1 in particular.
What book did you get that out of?![]()
![]()
Footballs a competitive sport college boy, soon we'll see all of your players wearing video cams on their foreheads.
by Bulls forever » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:48 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Choccies wrote:Have the council looked at Hargreaves Reserve in Modbury Heights mate? Around the corner from my place and isn't used for anything.Footy Smart wrote:
I believe its been investigated in the past but the council has had less resources available probably due to the GG and TTG $$. Im under the impression Hargraves needs some work done to it before being suitable/safe? I havent been to the oval since i played U13s on it 12 years ago![]()
However is saying that, I think the council has now the resources to properly look at the oval and is seeing what it can do for us.
by The Big Shrek » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:11 pm
finn wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Blacks130 wrote:Ah the hypocrisy of a narrow minded simpleton who uses the rules as the basis of his jibe and yet the manner in which the player has broken the rules is lost on him.NO-MERCY wrote:Must be a different rule for college teams, 1 in particular.
What book did you get that out of?![]()
![]()
Footballs a competitive sport college boy, soon we'll see all of your players wearing video cams on their foreheads.
There's a massive difference between late elbows and competition old sport.
By the way, throwing the college boy, uni poof sledge is terribly old hat...like calling all district sides bogans - it's patently not true.
by Flipper » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:02 pm
The Big Shrek wrote:No one has ever said all district sides are bogan though!
by Blacks130 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:41 pm
I'm a little surprised someone from Kilburn would dare cast aspersions about another clubThe Big Shrek wrote:No one has ever said all district sides are bogan though!
by The Big Shrek » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:50 pm
Blacks130 wrote:No just the ones with unsafe car parksThe Big Shrek wrote:No one has ever said all district sides are bogan though!![]()
by Blacks130 » Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:52 pm
You know your local history ProfessorThe Big Shrek wrote:Blacks130 wrote:No just the ones with unsafe car parksThe Big Shrek wrote:No one has ever said all district sides are bogan though!![]()
The "car park" for Uni's oval would surely be worse. Notorious beat. People being thrown off bridges etc.
by NO-MERCY » Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:02 pm
finn wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Blacks130 wrote:Ah the hypocrisy of a narrow minded simpleton who uses the rules as the basis of his jibe and yet the manner in which the player has broken the rules is lost on him.NO-MERCY wrote:Must be a different rule for college teams, 1 in particular.
What book did you get that out of?![]()
![]()
Footballs a competitive sport college boy, soon we'll see all of your players wearing video cams on their foreheads.
There's a massive difference between late elbows and competition old sport.
By the way, throwing the college boy, uni poof sledge is terribly old hat...like calling all district sides bogans - it's patently not true.
by JWKDD » Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:55 pm
by Blacks130 » Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:11 pm
by Yardy Lard » Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:08 pm
Blacks130 wrote:Umpiring skills aside, in the relatively short time I've enjoyed on this earth I have never come across a c*ck smoker like the B grade umpire I saw today at TTG. The TTG people were very hospitable but ffs, this bloke takes the cake with biased umpiring and he doesn't do too bad with the small mans syndrome either. When the TTG family I was standing near says something like "this bloke is embarassing" it gives you a good idea what was going on.
By the way, we lost and deservedly so.
Edit: I'm talking about the b grade and before NM or TBS ask, we weren't videoing the game
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |