The Sleeping Giant wrote:I'm guessing the Geelong medical report went against Whitecross. Pavlich had no case to answer, and it was mainly due to the Sydney medical report on Malceski.
Strawb will walk in and grizzle about WhiteX only getting one...

by Booney » Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:50 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:I'm guessing the Geelong medical report went against Whitecross. Pavlich had no case to answer, and it was mainly due to the Sydney medical report on Malceski.
by RustyCage » Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:57 pm
Booney wrote:Q. wrote:OnSong wrote:Whitecross got one week for the hit on Selwood. It looked fairly incidental to me??
That is beyond a joke
LMAO - He stood up to get back in the contest and Selwood ran into him!
by Wedgie » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:03 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by OnSong » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:09 pm
Wedgie wrote:Would have been nice if we got the free and not Hawthorn for what they deemed was a suspendable act.
by Booney » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:11 pm
OnSong wrote:Wedgie wrote:Would have been nice if we got the free and not Hawthorn for what they deemed was a suspendable act.
Well, considering it happened after the free-kick was paid for a throw, I think that is a ridiculous suggestion.
Otherwise Selwood could go ramming his head into anyone whenever he wanted and it would be a free kick. He almost does now.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:17 pm
by OnSong » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:21 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:yeah he has admitted that he milks some free kicks, so its not really earth shattering news
Booney wrote:OnSong wrote:Wedgie wrote:Would have been nice if we got the free and not Hawthorn for what they deemed was a suspendable act.
Well, considering it happened after the free-kick was paid for a throw, I think that is a ridiculous suggestion.
Otherwise Selwood could go ramming his head into anyone whenever he wanted and it would be a free kick. He almost does now.
Bloody hell. I can hear all the Catters fans knocking the door down now!!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:38 pm
by Booney » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:43 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:frees for
well you will be receiving the free kicks when you are the team that is first to the ball
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:52 pm
by Strawb » Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:00 pm
Booney wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:I'm guessing the Geelong medical report went against Whitecross. Pavlich had no case to answer, and it was mainly due to the Sydney medical report on Malceski.
Strawb will walk in and grizzle about WhiteX only getting one...
by The Sleeping Giant » Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:05 pm
OnSong wrote:
Compare that to fellow hard-nuts -
Chris Judd: 276 for, 189 against
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |