Will Geelong make the 8 this year?

Talk on the national game

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:14 pm

Shin Boner wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Shin Boner wrote:Geelong will easily make the top eight if the two pea hearts (Ottens & King) can stand up and be counted this year!! :wink:

Got rid of the pea heart in Kingsley.
Richmond forward line will be laughable with Kingsley and Richo there, 2 most pea hearted players in the comp.


Wedgie, what I meant was that both of these players could brake a finger nail and be out for 4 weeks - need to be more like Glenn Archer - he would try and play with a broken leg! :roll:


News flash geniear5e. Otto played every match for the Cats last season. Not bad for a big bloke coming off a groin injury (off the bone OUCH) and no pre-season.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Postby magpie in the 80's » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:16 pm

yet his counterpart looks likely to miss the 1st match to a SOFT tissue injury hey REB :wink:
I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)
User avatar
magpie in the 80's
Coach
 
 
Posts: 35437
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: in the quiz books
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 24 times

Postby Shin Boner » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:28 pm

REB, fancy King not playing the first game? :wink:
Shin Boner
Mini-League
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Blue Boy » Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:53 pm

2008 they will make the 8 as they will have a gun midfielder traded to them - maybe !!! :wink:
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:10 pm

Shin Boner wrote:REB, fancy King not playing the first game? :wink:


This day just gets better and better....

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Postby Ned » Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:57 pm

Shin Boner wrote:Geelong will easily make the top eight if the two pea hearts (Ottens & King) can stand up and be counted this year!! :wink:


Settle down shin boner, the Kangaroos would have to be the softest team in the AFL. Bunch of marshmellows.
User avatar
Ned
Rookie
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:49 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Shin Boner » Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:48 am

Ned wrote:
Shin Boner wrote:Geelong will easily make the top eight if the two pea hearts (Ottens & King) can stand up and be counted this year!! :wink:


Settle down shin boner, the Kangaroos would have to be the softest team in the AFL. Bunch of marshmellows.


Ned, what team do you support in the AFL :butthead:
Shin Boner
Mini-League
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:30 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby McAlmanac » Sun Apr 01, 2007 6:49 pm

I headed down to Telstra Dome today expecting to see a ripper clash. Unfortunately, Geelong didn't hold up their end of the bargain. They were terrible and on today's form there would have to be 8 better teams in the AFL.

While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.

On the bright side, Nathan Ablett showed he will be a star.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby Wedgie » Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:40 pm

McAlmanac wrote:While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.
Dunno, I thought Charlie had a much bigger influence on the game than Brad Ottens.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby McAlmanac » Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:49 pm

Wedgie wrote:
McAlmanac wrote:While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.
Dunno, I thought Charlie had a much bigger influence on the game than Brad Ottens.

Touche. Big Brad got a nice bronx cheer when he took a mark at the end of the game.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby McAlmanac » Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:18 pm

In fact, I went easy on Gardiner. A Geelong supporter rang Triple M after the match and called him the worst player in the AFL! :!:
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:52 am

McAlmanac wrote:I headed down to Telstra Dome today expecting to see a ripper clash. Unfortunately, Geelong didn't hold up their end of the bargain. They were terrible and on today's form there would have to be 8 better teams in the AFL.

While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.

On the bright side, Nathan Ablett showed he will be a star.


I'd say you couldn't be more negative about Geelong if you tried. True, we were second best by a fair way yesterday but I watched every game of the first round and I am still confident the Cats can finish in the in the 5-8 bracket. One thing I did notice is that the ruck was very influentual in most matches during round one and the Cats were clearly beaten in the middle and we need King back pronto. If King doesn't come good then Otto must ruck full time and we have to consider a smaller forward line much like the Bulldogs.

This time last year we were flying so I don't mind a slower start to the season so long as we don't end up 3-6 like last year. We had plenty out and if you think that is as good as it gets for Geelong this season then you are going to either lose a lot of bets or finish near the end of most tipping tables. As for Gardiner, I agree that he is a dud of the highest order. In fact, yesterday's match was one of his better ones so that should tell you plenty. One thing you have neglected to point out is that the Bulldogs are a fair side this season and I'll reckon they'll go top four.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Postby McAlmanac » Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:46 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
McAlmanac wrote:I headed down to Telstra Dome today expecting to see a ripper clash. Unfortunately, Geelong didn't hold up their end of the bargain. They were terrible and on today's form there would have to be 8 better teams in the AFL.

While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.

On the bright side, Nathan Ablett showed he will be a star.


I'd say you couldn't be more negative about Geelong if you tried. True, we were second best by a fair way yesterday but I watched every game of the first round and I am still confident the Cats can finish in the in the 5-8 bracket. One thing I did notice is that the ruck was very influentual in most matches during round one and the Cats were clearly beaten in the middle and we need King back pronto. If King doesn't come good then Otto must ruck full time and we have to consider a smaller forward line much like the Bulldogs.

This time last year we were flying so I don't mind a slower start to the season so long as we don't end up 3-6 like last year. We had plenty out and if you think that is as good as it gets for Geelong this season then you are going to either lose a lot of bets or finish near the end of most tipping tables. As for Gardiner, I agree that he is a dud of the highest order. In fact, yesterday's match was one of his better ones so that should tell you plenty. One thing you have neglected to point out is that the Bulldogs are a fair side this season and I'll reckon they'll go top four.

regards,

REB

Yes, good points REB. I have indeed sung the Bulldogs' praises on another thread - they are flag smokeys.

The old bloke Geelong supporter I sat next to made the same point about King. Ottens hasn't rucked full time for a few years and I doubt he has the motor to go all day. Blake was very ineffectual and has a long way to go. The other thing that stood out was fiddling about with poor short disposals. Wojcinski's goal on the burst just before half time was the sort of direct play the Cats lacked.

An interesting game awaits this week against a confident Carlton at the same venue.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:49 pm

I think we'll beat Carlton as I reckon Blake/Ottens/Mooney can handle Cloke/Ackland. Richmond were what, 27 points up at one stage with Pattison in ruck :shock: . I'll be disappointed if we drop that game.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mic and 16 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |