McAlmanac wrote:I headed down to Telstra Dome today expecting to see a ripper clash. Unfortunately, Geelong didn't hold up their end of the bargain. They were terrible and on today's form there would have to be 8 better teams in the AFL.
While I'm being negative about the Cats, is there a worse 50-gamer than Charlie Gardiner? He doesn't appear to have any decision making skills.
On the bright side, Nathan Ablett showed he will be a star.
I'd say you couldn't be more negative about Geelong if you tried. True, we were second best by a fair way yesterday but I watched every game of the first round and I am still confident the Cats can finish in the in the 5-8 bracket. One thing I did notice is that the ruck was very influentual in most matches during round one and the Cats were clearly beaten in the middle and we need King back pronto. If King doesn't come good then Otto must ruck full time and we have to consider a smaller forward line much like the Bulldogs.
This time last year we were flying so I don't mind a slower start to the season so long as we don't end up 3-6 like last year. We had plenty out and if you think that is as good as it gets for Geelong this season then you are going to either lose a lot of bets or finish near the end of most tipping tables. As for Gardiner, I agree that he is a dud of the highest order. In fact, yesterday's match was one of his better ones so that should tell you plenty. One thing you have neglected to point out is that the Bulldogs are a fair side this season and I'll reckon they'll go top four.
regards,
REB