Psyber wrote:None, but they are interested in his behaviour as an employee and representative of the club, whereas the Police are only interested in whether their is evidence to support a charge for a criminal offence.Barto wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-keeping-watch-on-fev-20100910-15503.html
Sieg G'day.Errrr... which branch of law enforcement do the AFL come under again? Cant recall that one."What we learn from the police is relevant and important, and if the Queensland police determine they want to take matters forward, that is relevant," he said.
"If they determine they have no further action to take, we would still reserve the right to conduct a further investigation.''
The AFL had already interviewed the woman before she laid the official complaint to police on Thursday.
These are totally different issues, and the outcome of one does not determine the outcome of the other.
So if you were accused of the a crime, you'd be OK if your employer went and interviewed the alleged victim and then told you that even if you're not charged, they reserve the right to make their own decision and sack you?