by Jimmy_041 » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:28 pm
by Felch » Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Top End wrote:Felch wrote:Agree 100% with the umpires NM. Some baffling decisions both ways - i can recall looking across to you guys NM on a few occasions, and you were as puzzled as us on what was going on.
It was a physical game, especially early. Seaton were definately cleaner with their skills, and had the better of us at most stoppages. Losing our CHF for the whole game just before halftime (because of his own stupidity) didnt help our cause either. Wanders was easily the best player on the ground, Coardy was also good off half back and that geriatric Marshall can still get a bit of it too ! His treatment of Portland's runner needs to be seriously looked at though
![]()
I thought Laslett was very good for us, as was Birdy. Perkins battled his bum off all day too.
Not a disastrous start for us, but still showed we need to improve in a few areas. I think we have the basics of a reasonable side though. As for Seaton, they look strong, good mix of older blokes and a few kids. Its early days i know, but would think they will be around the mark.
Crowd was good too, plenty of good natured sledging and banter going on. And a fair few cans being consumed as well ! Look forward to the return bout in round 10 at the Thunderdome !
Just saw your team sheet and where is Bascombe and D. Frank? It thought waring was injured and he played. was he ok. saw he kicked a couple so must have been reasonable
by Top End » Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:09 pm
Felch wrote:Top End wrote:Felch wrote:Agree 100% with the umpires NM. Some baffling decisions both ways - i can recall looking across to you guys NM on a few occasions, and you were as puzzled as us on what was going on.
It was a physical game, especially early. Seaton were definately cleaner with their skills, and had the better of us at most stoppages. Losing our CHF for the whole game just before halftime (because of his own stupidity) didnt help our cause either. Wanders was easily the best player on the ground, Coardy was also good off half back and that geriatric Marshall can still get a bit of it too ! His treatment of Portland's runner needs to be seriously looked at though
![]()
I thought Laslett was very good for us, as was Birdy. Perkins battled his bum off all day too.
Not a disastrous start for us, but still showed we need to improve in a few areas. I think we have the basics of a reasonable side though. As for Seaton, they look strong, good mix of older blokes and a few kids. Its early days i know, but would think they will be around the mark.
Crowd was good too, plenty of good natured sledging and banter going on. And a fair few cans being consumed as well ! Look forward to the return bout in round 10 at the Thunderdome !
Just saw your team sheet and where is Bascombe and D. Frank? It thought waring was injured and he played. was he ok. saw he kicked a couple so must have been reasonable
Bascombe back at Virginia - both parties agreed to part ways. Dylan Frank was short of a run and played ressies, as did Hamilton, Hinsley and Williams. Cahill maybe a week or 2 away also.
I will let Piccachu comment on Wareing's performance...
by CoverKing » Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:21 pm
by piccachu » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:08 am
Sounds like waring must have played extrmely well then and will be hard to listen to during the week when he gets on here
by Diesel » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:34 am
Newman wrote:Felch wrote:Agree 100% with the umpires NM. Some baffling decisions both ways - i can recall looking across to you guys NM on a few occasions, and you were as puzzled as us on what was going on.
It was a physical game, especially early. Seaton were definately cleaner with their skills, and had the better of us at most stoppages. Losing our CHF for the whole game just before halftime (because of his own stupidity) didnt help our cause either. Wanders was easily the best player on the ground, Coardy was also good off half back and that geriatric Marshall can still get a bit of it too ! His treatment of Portland's runner needs to be seriously looked at though
![]()
I thought Laslett was very good for us, as was Birdy. Perkins battled his bum off all day too.
Not a disastrous start for us, but still showed we need to improve in a few areas. I think we have the basics of a reasonable side though. As for Seaton, they look strong, good mix of older blokes and a few kids. Its early days i know, but would think they will be around the mark.
Crowd was good too, plenty of good natured sledging and banter going on. And a fair few cans being consumed as well ! Look forward to the return bout in round 10 at the Thunderdome !
The serial pest runner needs to have a good hard look at himself!! Agree with the comments stated a really hard physical contest marred by some very over umpired decisions. Going to have that problem when two young guys who have been umpiring SANFL Under 18's come and umpire Amateur league games. Lot more contested footy that these umpires need adapt to, perhaps the powers at be need to let them know this. Great to see lots of Portland people hang around for a beer and a chat after the game.
by piccachu » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:43 am
Have To agree with Newman about the serial pest runner. I remember a game last year where all the runner wanted to do was to come out and abuse opposition players rather than deliver his message and get off the ground. Its just funny how there are two issues now and the same runner is involved, you do the maths and work out who the problem is. Im sure there are more people who can back this up too!!!!!!!
by Footy Chick » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:46 am
piccachu wrote:i wish that was the case top end. he was extremly ordinary at best and did some stupid things at stupid times.
.
by piccachu » Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:53 am
why is it that it seems you are getting joy from others misfortuneHe didn't, did he?
by Felch » Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:11 am
Diesel wrote:Newman wrote:Felch wrote:Agree 100% with the umpires NM. Some baffling decisions both ways - i can recall looking across to you guys NM on a few occasions, and you were as puzzled as us on what was going on.
It was a physical game, especially early. Seaton were definately cleaner with their skills, and had the better of us at most stoppages. Losing our CHF for the whole game just before halftime (because of his own stupidity) didnt help our cause either. Wanders was easily the best player on the ground, Coardy was also good off half back and that geriatric Marshall can still get a bit of it too ! His treatment of Portland's runner needs to be seriously looked at though
![]()
I thought Laslett was very good for us, as was Birdy. Perkins battled his bum off all day too.
Not a disastrous start for us, but still showed we need to improve in a few areas. I think we have the basics of a reasonable side though. As for Seaton, they look strong, good mix of older blokes and a few kids. Its early days i know, but would think they will be around the mark.
Crowd was good too, plenty of good natured sledging and banter going on. And a fair few cans being consumed as well ! Look forward to the return bout in round 10 at the Thunderdome !
The serial pest runner needs to have a good hard look at himself!! Agree with the comments stated a really hard physical contest marred by some very over umpired decisions. Going to have that problem when two young guys who have been umpiring SANFL Under 18's come and umpire Amateur league games. Lot more contested footy that these umpires need adapt to, perhaps the powers at be need to let them know this. Great to see lots of Portland people hang around for a beer and a chat after the game.
Have To agree with Newman about the serial pest runner. I remember a game last year where all the runner wanted to do was to come out and abuse opposition players rather than deliver his message and get off the ground. Its just funny how there are two issues now and the same runner is involved, you do the maths and work out who the problem is. Im sure there are more people who can back this up too!!!!!!!
by Flipper » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:36 pm
by turbo182 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:50 pm
Flipper wrote:The A grade had a female umpire in the CBC V PH game and before a ball up she's said very politely "Eyes up boys, eyes up".
But in all honesty thought the umps in the A grade and B grade were good. Obviously a couple of decisions i didnt agree with but u can understand that.
by Flipper » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:30 pm
turbo182 wrote:Flipper wrote:The A grade had a female umpire in the CBC V PH game and before a ball up she's said very politely "Eyes up boys, eyes up".
But in all honesty thought the umps in the A grade and B grade were good. Obviously a couple of decisions i didnt agree with but u can understand that.
Heard you boys were very, very impressive Flipper...
4 big lads playing for you dominated the aerial contests and set you up in the first quarter? Or have I been mis-informed?
Just out of interest Flipper, how many of your A grade players are old Schollars?
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:34 pm
Flipper wrote:turbo182 wrote:Flipper wrote:The A grade had a female umpire in the CBC V PH game and before a ball up she's said very politely "Eyes up boys, eyes up".
But in all honesty thought the umps in the A grade and B grade were good. Obviously a couple of decisions i didnt agree with but u can understand that.
Heard you boys were very, very impressive Flipper...
4 big lads playing for you dominated the aerial contests and set you up in the first quarter? Or have I been mis-informed?
Just out of interest Flipper, how many of your A grade players are old Schollars?
It was a good performance from the lads. We got a really good group and things just click between all the lads, very close on and off the field.
We would have 10 or so old schollars in the A grade and 16+ in the B grade. We have a really strong connection with Port Augusta and its private school Caritas College. So we get a few boys from that area as well.
But we like to consider ourselves open to everyone. Doesnt make a difference at the selection table where u come from as long as you take pride in the name and the colours.
by Flipper » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:36 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Flipper wrote:turbo182 wrote:Flipper wrote:The A grade had a female umpire in the CBC V PH game and before a ball up she's said very politely "Eyes up boys, eyes up".
But in all honesty thought the umps in the A grade and B grade were good. Obviously a couple of decisions i didnt agree with but u can understand that.
Heard you boys were very, very impressive Flipper...
4 big lads playing for you dominated the aerial contests and set you up in the first quarter? Or have I been mis-informed?
Just out of interest Flipper, how many of your A grade players are old Schollars?
It was a good performance from the lads. We got a really good group and things just click between all the lads, very close on and off the field.
We would have 10 or so old schollars in the A grade and 16+ in the B grade. We have a really strong connection with Port Augusta and its private school Caritas College. So we get a few boys from that area as well.
But we like to consider ourselves open to everyone. Doesnt make a difference at the selection table where u come from as long as you take pride in the name and the colours.
by RedMagpie » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:46 pm
Flipper wrote:Prob not the best choice of words. But u get what i mean. It takes real courage to wear purple!!!
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:47 pm
by teaoby » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:54 pm
by Latte Lad » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:56 pm
by Flipper » Mon Apr 12, 2010 1:56 pm
RedMagpie wrote:Flipper wrote:Prob not the best choice of words. But u get what i mean. It takes real courage to wear purple!!!
What Possie is Coung Phan playing, played Juniors with him at North Pines then at Port Adelaide. Was a good Ruckman then Center Half Forward, but being Asian we thought he would eventually stop growing!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |