Punk Rooster wrote:TSG- you're not allowed to tell Glenelg supporters there club isn't as fantastic as they like to believe...
WTF??? You mean it isn't?
When did that happen?

by dedja » Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:44 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:TSG- you're not allowed to tell Glenelg supporters there club isn't as fantastic as they like to believe...
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:45 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:The Sleeping Giant wrote:dedja wrote:LOL, it's an obsession, isn't it TSG? ... but by all means keep going your hardest!
Don't flatter yourself. It's just your club is the only one who sacked their CEO 2 days before the start of the season.
TSG- you're not allowed to tell Glenelg supporters there club isn't as fantastic as they like to believe...
by klaan » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:06 pm
Pseudo wrote:klaan wrote:Fair enough if you dont want to - I would have thought that anything posted online is 'public' and if he didn't want it spread he shouldn't have put it on there in the first place....
You guys make the call - enlighten the rest of us please....
...and if you really want to read it, nothing is stopping you from registering on SL.org.
Barro posted only on SL.org - not here - and I think this should be respected, as per his wishes.
Wedgie it would be appreciated if you would replace your quote of Barro's post with a link to the actual post on SL.org. Cheers.
by Punk Rooster » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:29 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Whatever - we won, you lost Ha Ha
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Pseudo » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:29 pm
klaan wrote:How far do we go with your logic (or lack of it) Pseudo..... Can we quote anything written from any other source or do we specifically have to get their approval? If it is written, it can be reproduced - SIMPLE. Get over yourselves.
by Trent Plucktrum » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:39 pm
Pseudo wrote:klaan wrote:How far do we go with your logic (or lack of it) Pseudo..... Can we quote anything written from any other source or do we specifically have to get their approval? If it is written, it can be reproduced - SIMPLE. Get over yourselves.
As a matter of respect for the author, I would generally seek permission from him/her when copying his/her articles across fora. It may not be necessary, but it is courteous. Since you apparently have neither respect nor courtesy then I guess it ain't an issue for you.
I am not going to preach to you about the legalities of copy-and-pasting articles from copyrighted sources (eg AdelaideNow) rather than posting a link to said info. Presumably the moderators here have their own policy regarding this. Court their wrath at your leisure.
Lastly, if you had simply visited Snoutslouts.org, clicked on the "register" link and filled in a few details, then we would not be having this conversation right now. The information is not hidden from you; it merely takes a small amount of work on your behalf to be seen. Frankly if you find the act of registration too complex for your mental faculties, and would rather obtain the information you desire by begging and whingeing for somebody else to do the hard work, then SL.org is healthier without your participation.
Oh, and FOAD.
by klaan » Sun Mar 28, 2010 2:46 pm
by bosvit » Sun Mar 28, 2010 3:48 pm
klaan wrote:Thank you for not preaching Pseudo........... All of the other eight Clubs supporters are better for it.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:01 pm
klaan wrote:Thank you for not preaching Pseudo........... All of the other eight Clubs supporters are better for it.
by Big Phil » Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:07 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:26 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:30 pm
by Squawk » Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:23 pm
wycbloods wrote:
I assume rightly or wrongly that he was employed on a salary greater than 105K........................if he was then he has no entitlement to a unfair dismissal claim.
by dedja » Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:28 pm
Squawk wrote:wycbloods wrote:
I assume rightly or wrongly that he was employed on a salary greater than 105K........................if he was then he has no entitlement to a unfair dismissal claim.
Maybe not in the Industrial Court but you can make a civil claim for breach of contract in the District Court.
by Squawk » Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:46 pm
dedja wrote:Squawk wrote:wycbloods wrote:
I assume rightly or wrongly that he was employed on a salary greater than 105K........................if he was then he has no entitlement to a unfair dismissal claim.
Maybe not in the Industrial Court but you can make a civil claim for breach of contract in the District Court.
Interesting ... wycbloods is correct, under little Johnny's IR laws you can't make a claim for unfair dismissal is your salary (including super) is over $100K indexed, which would be around $107K now.
Squawk is correct that in that it can be pursued as a breach of contract, but to be honest (and I've been there personally) it's not easy to prove and get a judgement in your favour and you need $$$.
by dedja » Mon Mar 29, 2010 7:13 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:49 pm
Squawk wrote:wycbloods wrote:
I assume rightly or wrongly that he was employed on a salary greater than 105K........................if he was then he has no entitlement to a unfair dismissal claim.
Maybe not in the Industrial Court but you can make a civil claim for breach of contract in the District Court.
by wycbloods » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:52 pm
dedja wrote:Spot on mate ... It's basically a bluff tactic to get a few more weeks pay.
by Squawk » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:55 pm
wycbloods wrote:dedja wrote:Spot on mate ... It's basically a bluff tactic to get a few more weeks pay.
Unless they have given him nothing i would be surprised if he would be getting any more than 6 weeks + notice of 4 weeks in a best case scenario so unless there was a contract broken i can't see why he is pursuing it.
by Big Phil » Tue Jun 08, 2010 11:07 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |