Wedgie wrote:Coopers wonderful products certainly speak for themselves,
So that would be the beer talking.
by nickname » Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:27 pm
Wedgie wrote:Coopers wonderful products certainly speak for themselves,
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:28 pm
wycbloods wrote:Me thinks someone has had far too many coopers over a long period of time. Might stay off that stuff it looks like it does funny things to people.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by wycbloods » Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:38 pm
Wedgie wrote:wycbloods wrote:Me thinks someone has had far too many coopers over a long period of time. Might stay off that stuff it looks like it does funny things to people.
I blame the West End I drank as an uneducated kid!
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:46 pm
wycbloods wrote:Wedgie wrote:wycbloods wrote:Me thinks someone has had far too many coopers over a long period of time. Might stay off that stuff it looks like it does funny things to people.
I blame the West End I drank as an uneducated kid!
I think there are a few more things than beer to blame.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by stan » Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:10 pm
Wedgie wrote:wycbloods wrote:Wedgie wrote:wycbloods wrote:Me thinks someone has had far too many coopers over a long period of time. Might stay off that stuff it looks like it does funny things to people.
I blame the West End I drank as an uneducated kid!
I think there are a few more things than beer to blame.
Youch!
I wonder if North will be allowed to wear the Coopers emblem on their back orifice this would contravene any rules?
I also wonder if this new sponsorship will help up negotiations and help if West Emd are keen to be involved with our great league?
Didn't a conflict arise because od showdowns and the fact one of the AFL clubs the SANFL owns the license for isn't sponsored by West End?
by The Apostle » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:16 pm
on the rails wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:Securing a sponsorship is stealing another clubs idea??? I suppose Centrals invented sponsorship then?
by o five » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:22 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:on the rails wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:Securing a sponsorship is stealing another clubs idea??? I suppose Centrals invented sponsorship then?
Yes it is when North are just apeing what another club is currently doing but I suppose North would be all for sponsorship these days since Rob Gerard is rumoured to be no longer propping up your club and paying the bills out Menzies Cres way.
And as for Centrals...Holden is our major sponsor since 1989...you Roosters supporters remember the last match of that year fondly.
by on the rails » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:25 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:on the rails wrote:The Apostle AK wrote:Securing a sponsorship is stealing another clubs idea??? I suppose Centrals invented sponsorship then?
Yes it is when North are just apeing what another club is currently doing but I suppose North would be all for sponsorship these days since Rob Gerard is rumoured to be no longer propping up your club and paying the bills out Menzies Cres way.
And as for Centrals...Holden is our major sponsor since 1989...you Roosters supporters remember the last match of that year fondly.
by The Apostle » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:47 pm
on the rails wrote:Yes we remember back then prior to the AFL coming into the SA Football landscape, back in the days when Centrals couldn't win a finals match the odd time they used to make them.
by tipper » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:53 pm
The Apostle AK wrote:on the rails wrote:Yes we remember back then prior to the AFL coming into the SA Football landscape, back in the days when Centrals couldn't win a finals match the odd time they used to make them.
And SANFL premierships are so easy to win these days...
As i've said recently, you Roosters supporters are starting to sound more and more like frustrated Sturt and Glenelg supporters as time goes on. That "pre 1991 SANFL premierships are worth more than ones these days" excuse is something i've heard plenty of times from Bays supporters.
If they're so easy to win, why hasn't your club even been close to winning one??? (That includes your effort in the 2007 GF)...
by The Apostle » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:57 pm
tipper wrote:Where did any of the north posters above say they were easier to win now? you are the one that brought up the past. personally i have argued several times on here that the old line "it was harder back whenever" is a load of bollocks.
on the rails wrote:Yes we remember back then prior to the AFL coming into the SA Football landscape
by tipper » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:01 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:05 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by tipper » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:10 pm
by The Apostle » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:13 pm
tipper wrote:meanwhile you completely ignored teh question about your supporting history. were you at centrals games pre crows???
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:28 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by therisingblues » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:43 pm
Wedgie wrote:Back on track please fellas, were talking beer here!
AK Apostle wrote:tipper wrote:meanwhile you ignored teh question about your supporting history. were you at centrals games pre crows???
No. I didn't go to Centrals matches until 1994-95ish and didn't support Centrals fulltime until sometime in 1997...don't worry I have my 1998 and 1999 Centrals season tickets somewhere...
Hey Wedgie, you tried Coopers Vintage Ale lately???
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:46 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Blacky » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:49 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:53 pm
Blacky wrote:i reckon if westend had a red and white label wedgie wouldnt mine drinking west end
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |