by bayman » Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:08 pm
by locky801 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:33 pm
bayman wrote:front page headline
''SAVE OUR SOUL''
can someone explain to me how they can have their soul saved when it was sold 20 years ago ?
for the record i think port magpies will be around a lot longer than just this year
by Pseudo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:32 pm
locky801 wrote:How he has lasted in the media for this long astounds me,
by Pseudo » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:33 pm
bayman wrote:for the record i think port magpies will be around a lot longer than just this year
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:59 pm
by Strawb » Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:22 pm
by redandblack » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:00 am
by Brucetiki » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:01 am
purch wrote:duncs wrote:Just my 2c
Stop reading his columns and reacting to them. All ur doin is helping the Advertiser sell papers. More papers they sell the longer Rucci stays.
Simple really.
If i want quality journalism, i certainly wouldnt be lookin through the Advertiser
Easy...Boycott the Advertiser! (If you haven't already)
by sjt » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:27 am
by Bunton » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:02 am
by Mr Beefy » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:18 am
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:21 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Why are there (at least) 2 topics devoted to someone who all say writes rubbish, yet you all read it?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by sjt » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:25 am
Mr Beefy wrote:Why are there (at least) 2 topics devoted to someone who all say writes rubbish, yet you all read it?
by locky801 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:27 am
by Mr Beefy » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:52 am
sjt wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Why are there (at least) 2 topics devoted to someone who all say writes rubbish, yet you all read it?
Because it's one of the few publications we have in this state that does occasionally provide SANFL content. Also in order to comment/debate a topic it's good to get all views, even the ridiculous ones. Furthermore some less informed South Australians actually believe what he writes because they have no other information sources, such as this website.
by gossipgirl » Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:01 pm
locky801 wrote:Dont need to read his crap, or the Advertiser, anything you want to know about SA Footy (any footy or sport actually) is found right here on this site and it is a hell of a lot more accurate than the trifle dished up by some journos around the country and in particular this State
by sjt » Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:08 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:sjt wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Why are there (at least) 2 topics devoted to someone who all say writes rubbish, yet you all read it?
Because it's one of the few publications we have in this state that does occasionally provide SANFL content. Also in order to comment/debate a topic it's good to get all views, even the ridiculous ones. Furthermore some less informed South Australians actually believe what he writes because they have no other information sources, such as this website.
If they have no other information sources, such as this website, how are they going to be more informed by reading this topic on this website?
by am Bays » Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:10 pm
redandblack wrote:I listened to Demetriou yesterday.
It's patently obvious that the AFL support the SANFL's actions in the Port matter.
He also spoke about the stadium deals.
by Barto » Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:47 pm
am Bays wrote:redandblack wrote:I listened to Demetriou yesterday.
It's patently obvious that the AFL support the SANFL's actions in the Port matter.
He also spoke about the stadium deals.
Why wouldn't he be happy with the SANFL decision.
The essence of the decisions made Tue night Wed morning was that the SANFL is prepared to ensure the survival of one of his (the AFLs) clubs - Port Power but is prepared to send one of their (the SANFLs) clubs to the wall.
by redandblack » Sat Feb 13, 2010 12:14 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |