messenger.news wrote:Keep F5-ing your page to refresh.
Thanks for being patient.
Thanks mate, did that and it did update 7.30pm to 7.50pm.
Thanks for the update!

by Wedgie » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:42 pm
messenger.news wrote:Keep F5-ing your page to refresh.
Thanks for being patient.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Barto » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:42 pm
by Mr Irate » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:43 pm
messenger.news wrote:Keep F5-ing your page to refresh.
Thanks for being patient.
by Wedgie » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Barto wrote:Just tuned into 5AA.. that was a press conference?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by messenger.news » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:46 pm
by messenger.news » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:47 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:50 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Mr Irate » Tue Feb 09, 2010 7:53 pm
by messenger.news » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:05 pm
by Mr Irate » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:07 pm
by tipper » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:07 pm
by bayman » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:10 pm
Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
by UK Fan » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:11 pm
bayman wrote:Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
who is that playing in the AFL i read you ask Mr Irate......it is a franchised football team using the port name![]()
who remembers the port grand finals in the late 70's into the early 90's & a group would walk around the outer with a coffin ? well they may well be walking around the outer with their clubs ashes in it....
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Mr Irate » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:12 pm
bayman wrote:Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
who is that playing in the AFL i read you ask Mr Irate......it is a franchised football team using the port name![]()
who remembers the port grand finals in the late 70's into the early 90's & a group would walk around the outer with a coffin ? well they may well be walking around the outer with their clubs ashes in it....
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:14 pm
Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
by Mr Irate » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:16 pm
stan wrote:Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
Regardless of the ae old debate, a reporter will always try to sensationalise it, well from Channel 9 they will
by Brucetiki » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:19 pm
bayman wrote:Mr Irate wrote:According to latest Channel 9 update a NO vote will cause the death of the Port Adelaide Football Club and 140 years of history........so, at the risk of re-igniting the age old debate......who is that playing in the AFL ?
who is that playing in the AFL i read you ask Mr Irate......it is a franchised football team using the port name![]()
who remembers the port grand finals in the late 70's into the early 90's & a group would walk around the outer with a coffin ? well they may well be walking around the outer with their clubs ashes in it....
by Harry the Horse » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:22 pm
by stan » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:24 pm
Harry the Horse wrote:Mate of mine just got back from there and said Ch 9 and Ch 2 were the only ones down there when he left.
So much for a "big" football story.
by Wedgie » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:30 pm
stan wrote:Harry the Horse wrote:Mate of mine just got back from there and said Ch 9 and Ch 2 were the only ones down there when he left.
So much for a "big" football story.
The SANFL does not exist for Chanel 10 and Chanel 7 - Never has and never will.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |