Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Apachebulldog » Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:18 am

One day it will happen the SANFL will be a feeder base for the allmighty omnipotent AFL.
SANFL 2000 - 2011 Central District 12 consecutive Grand Final appearances and 9 Premierships.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFF.

Hit em hard let them get up and hit em again.
User avatar
Apachebulldog
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:05 pm
Location: On the prairie
Has liked: 381 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby therisingblues » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:59 pm

I think Fremantle completely kicked ass when they had a reserves side in the WAFL. Could you imagine if Port and Crows finished 1st and 2nd in the SANFL but weren't allowed to play in finals? The SANFL would look very poor indeed.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Fukuoka
Has liked: 369 times
Been liked: 514 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Barto » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:02 pm

therisingblues wrote:I think Fremantle completely kicked ass when they had a reserves side in the WAFL. Could you imagine if Port and Crows finished 1st and 2nd in the SANFL but weren't allowed to play in finals? The SANFL would look very poor indeed.


Fremantle never had a reserves side in the WAFL.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby satan311 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:37 pm

Barto wrote:
therisingblues wrote:I think Fremantle completely kicked ass when they had a reserves side in the WAFL. Could you imagine if Port and Crows finished 1st and 2nd in the SANFL but weren't allowed to play in finals? The SANFL would look very poor indeed.


Fremantle never had a reserves side in the WAFL.


Well you could say they did. They were aligned with South Fremantle for a few years and so all Freo players would play for them in the WAFL when not picked. That team did well, but not as well as the West Coast aligned team East Perth. They won 3 flags while aligned and dominated the comp. Thankfully sanity prevailed and the idea was scrapped for the sake of the WAFL
User avatar
satan311
Mini-League
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:25 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Barto » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:12 am

satan311 wrote:
Barto wrote:
therisingblues wrote:I think Fremantle completely kicked ass when they had a reserves side in the WAFL. Could you imagine if Port and Crows finished 1st and 2nd in the SANFL but weren't allowed to play in finals? The SANFL would look very poor indeed.


Fremantle never had a reserves side in the WAFL.


Well you could say they did. They were aligned with South Fremantle for a few years and so all Freo players would play for them in the WAFL when not picked. That team did well, but not as well as the West Coast aligned team East Perth. They won 3 flags while aligned and dominated the comp. Thankfully sanity prevailed and the idea was scrapped for the sake of the WAFL


Yeah they had the host club arrangement but it wasn't an actual ressies.

Didn't East Perth win a premiership outside the host club arrangement?
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:16 am

If the SANFL is, indeed, the strongest comp outside the AFL then I wouldn't expect an AFL reserves side to dominate, with their 18 year olds, has beens and never weres, and top up players from local leagues
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5128
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 411 times
Been liked: 676 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby nickname » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:32 am

It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:47 am

nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5128
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 411 times
Been liked: 676 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby nickname » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:22 am

Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Yes, I mean more bastardised than that.
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Booney » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:30 am

With ( perhaps ) only 8 teams and one club a merged entity to boot.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 60943
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8046 times
Been liked: 11722 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Hondo » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:08 am

nickname wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Yes, I mean more bastardised than that.


You mean players that pull out of SANFL finals because they only played 3 games there and train there once a week?

You mean players potentially being played out of position at their SANFL club at the request of the AFL club?

It suits the SANFL clubs to get these AFL listed players in their teams even though it comes at a but of a price.

I am not trying to contradict you here because a full on AFL reserves side is another level of bastardisation. But our comp is already compromised by the AFL. While I don't support Crows and Power reserves sides in the SANFL I think there are problems in the current interchange system that would be solved if the AFL listed players were left out of the SANFL clubs altogether.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Barto » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:09 am

Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Do you reckon a footballer would pull out of a contest against a team mate?
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Hondo » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:14 am

Barto wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Do you reckon a footballer would pull out of a contest against a team mate?


Do you really think all AFL listed players go full throttle for their SANFL club all the time?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Mr Beefy » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:15 am

Barto wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Do you reckon a footballer would pull out of a contest against a team mate?


Probably not a st kilda player playing against lovett but ....
User avatar
Mr Beefy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5128
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:18 pm
Has liked: 411 times
Been liked: 676 times
Grassroots Team: Rosewater

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby Barto » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:56 am

hondo71 wrote:
Barto wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Do you reckon a footballer would pull out of a contest against a team mate?


Do you really think all AFL listed players go full throttle for their SANFL club all the time?


Good point. They definitely dont balk a contest in internal trials.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby westcoastpanther » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:56 am

hondo71 wrote:
Barto wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
nickname wrote:It's not a matter of whether they would dominate, it's the fact that we end up with a bastardised competition.


Do you mean more bastardised than AFL teammates playing against each other at SANFL level and one can never be quite sure they are going in as hard as they could be against their teammates?


Do you reckon a footballer would pull out of a contest against a team mate?


Do you really think all AFL listed players go full throttle for their SANFL club all the time?


If they want to impress their AFL coaches to get back in to the team then of course they will be going in hard. If they were seen to pull out/shirk a contest I don't think they would keep their AFL contracts very long.......or get back in to respective AFL team ever again
Hi, My name is Ron 'Bluey' Dunn. Did you know I played in the 61 & 62 Tasman Premiership sides....
User avatar
westcoastpanther
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5489
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Weipa
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 150 times
Grassroots Team: Boston

Re: Magpies/Power Merger 4th Option

Postby nickname » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:50 pm

hondo71 wrote:
You mean players that pull out of SANFL finals because they only played 3 games there and train there once a week?

You mean players potentially being played out of position at their SANFL club at the request of the AFL club?

It suits the SANFL clubs to get these AFL listed players in their teams even though it comes at a but of a price.

I am not trying to contradict you here because a full on AFL reserves side is another level of bastardisation. But our comp is already compromised by the AFL. While I don't support Crows and Power reserves sides in the SANFL I think there are problems in the current interchange system that would be solved if the AFL listed players were left out of the SANFL clubs altogether.


I agree with that Hondo. But at least the SANFL clubs have the choice of selecting AFL listed players if they think they're getting an advantage out of them, and the allocation of these players is done with a view to trying to even up the comp (reverse premiership order). It doesn't create an uneven playing field in the way that a SANFL team using AFL standard training and rehab facilities and staff would.
nickname
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |