by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:23 pm
by acockfromwayback » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:49 pm
by acockfromwayback » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:59 pm
by bloods08 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:44 pm
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 12:35 am
by Punk Rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:11 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:10 am
Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
by Rik E Boy » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:58 am
rod_rooster wrote:Test Team:
Graeme Smith (c)
Matthew Hayden
Ricky Ponting
Brian Lara
Sachin Tendulkar
Jaques Kallis
Adam Gilchrist
Shaun Pollock
Shane Warne
Muthiah Muralidaran
Glen McGrath
12th Makhaya Ntini
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:03 am
by Moe » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:06 am
acockfromwayback wrote:ODI :
in rough batting order
Gilchrist(wk)
Sehwag
Ponting
Tendulkar
Pieterson
Afridi
Flintoff
Pollock(c)
Lee
Muralidarin
McGrath
12th
Gayle/Jayasuria(batting)
Vettori(bowling)
same mad bowling power in this side. all par Ponting and Gilly have good(reasonable) records with the ball
by rod_rooster » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:22 am
Rik E Boy wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Test Team:
Graeme Smith (c)
Matthew Hayden
Ricky Ponting
Brian Lara
Sachin Tendulkar
Jaques Kallis
Adam Gilchrist
Shaun Pollock
Shane Warne
Muthiah Muralidaran
Glen McGrath
12th Makhaya Ntini
I agree with your personell but I would give the captaincy to Warne even though he didn't get the gig for Australia. We all know why Warne didn't get the gig but I have never heard anyone who knows more about Cricket than Warney. He even puts Richie to shame. The way he discusses his bowling plans and how he is thinking about getting batsmen out makes me think that Australia lost a huge opportunity by not making him captain. Make Warne skipper in 2005 and we win the Ashes IMO.
regards,
REB
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:28 am
by cripple » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:01 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:ODI Runs
Sangakkara 7878 @ 35.97 (74.71)
Other notable averages or strike rates
Gilchrist 7243 @ 36.58 (100.54)
by MAY-Z » Wed Jan 06, 2010 5:41 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jan 06, 2010 6:25 pm
by spell_check » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:14 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
No we don't, 2000-2009, the first decade of the millenium, the end of 2010 will be 11 years.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:54 am
spell_check wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
No we don't, 2000-2009, the first decade of the millenium, the end of 2010 will be 11 years.
I think from now on, if you (anyone) want to make up a thread about team of decade etc. you should make it the team of the 00s - to save bandwith on topics such as these.
by MightyEagles » Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:03 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
No we don't, 2000-2009, the first decade of the millenium, the end of 2010 will be 11 years.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:04 am
MightyEagles wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
No we don't, 2000-2009, the first decade of the millenium, the end of 2010 will be 11 years.
Not if you start from 2001.
by Dirk Tazelaar » Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:44 am
MightyEagles wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:we still have 12 months people....
No we don't, 2000-2009, the first decade of the millenium, the end of 2010 will be 11 years.
Not if you start from 2001.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |