Moe wrote:So we are the only duds not to have a player in the side?![]()
Oh well, lets hope you blokes do well
Also us and Sheidow Moe.
by bazza1 » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:31 pm
Moe wrote:So we are the only duds not to have a player in the side?![]()
Oh well, lets hope you blokes do well
by Bulldogga55 » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:33 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:34 pm
by Moe » Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:44 pm
by Roseboy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:55 pm
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:01 pm
Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
by Amateur Footy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:18 pm
wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
Who are the interesting ones to you RB?
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:23 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
Who are the interesting ones to you RB?
Shouldn't matter who Skinny has or hasn't seen. Only play sides once a season - that's not much to go on.
Not a bad side anyway but McKinley in for Pritchard IMO. If Pritchard was making runs then fine, but he's not. Cheek lucky but he's not going too bad this season.
Atleast plenty of all rounders to choose from there. Calderbank will make a fine No. 11.
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:24 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
Who are the interesting ones to you RB?
Shouldn't matter who Skinny has or hasn't seen. Only play sides once a season - that's not much to go on.
Not a bad side anyway but McKinley in for Pritchard IMO. If Pritchard was making runs then fine, but he's not. Cheek lucky but he's not going too bad this season.
Atleast plenty of all rounders to choose from there. Calderbank will make a fine No. 11.
by Amateur Footy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:26 pm
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:27 pm
by CoverKing » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:28 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:By the way, does anyone else think the picture of the guy with the dog in page 2 of the aftershave thread under 'General Discussion' is Russell King?
by Amateur Footy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:30 pm
CoverKing wrote:Also, Skinny has spoken to opposing captains such as Basso on who they have seen perform well this year and who they would consider for the side!!
He talks about the team to a fair few people from other clubs.
Why no O'Malley by the way? Leading wicket taker from last year and up there again!
by Amateur Footy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:32 pm
CoverKing wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:By the way, does anyone else think the picture of the guy with the dog in page 2 of the aftershave thread under 'General Discussion' is Russell King?
Please tell me you mean the second picture and not the first??
by wycbloods » Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:36 pm
Amateur Footy wrote:CoverKing wrote:Also, Skinny has spoken to opposing captains such as Basso on who they have seen perform well this year and who they would consider for the side!!
He talks about the team to a fair few people from other clubs.
Why no O'Malley by the way? Leading wicket taker from last year and up there again!
I was not considering a 12 man team, in that case yes, Calderbank will make a fine no 12![]()
O'Malley needs 20 overs to wear the batsmen down, he won't get that at association level with those other bowlers. If you take into account strike rates it's probably a fair call.
by Roseboy » Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:46 am
wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
Who are the interesting ones to you RB?
by Tight_Lines » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:19 am
Amateur Footy wrote:wycbloods wrote:Roseboy wrote:Thanks Bloods.
Couple of interesting selections which will get peole talking. Gotta think this team will give the other associations a fair old scare / touch up.
Who are the interesting ones to you RB?
Shouldn't matter who Skinny has or hasn't seen. Only play sides once a season - that's not much to go on.
Not a bad side anyway but McKinley in for Pritchard IMO. If Pritchard was making runs then fine, but he's not. Cheek lucky but he's not going too bad this season.
Atleast plenty of all rounders to choose from there. Calderbank will make a fine No. 11.
by CoverKing » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:22 am
by caleb777 » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:55 am
by Gowser » Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:17 pm
wycbloods wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:CoverKing wrote:Also, Skinny has spoken to opposing captains such as Basso on who they have seen perform well this year and who they would consider for the side!!
He talks about the team to a fair few people from other clubs.
Why no O'Malley by the way? Leading wicket taker from last year and up there again!
I was not considering a 12 man team, in that case yes, Calderbank will make a fine no 12![]()
O'Malley needs 20 overs to wear the batsmen down, he won't get that at association level with those other bowlers. If you take into account strike rates it's probably a fair call.
Fair point about O'Malley and as you said he won't get that many overs in the association game as they are limited over games.
CoverKing wrote:2 - When he has played in the seniors, he has a pretty poor record
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |