In terms of giving away free kicks? Sure. We give away far too many 25m penalties in particular.Choccies wrote:morell wrote:Yeah, yeah, just poking a bit of fun at our cross town rivals to spice up the forums a bit. I think the person was insinuating that the Mitchell Park FC is less committed to the cause or slack on the training track. Fail to see how considering the beating we gave them in the trial during last years pre-season.Lightning McQueen wrote:morell wrote:"...if you want to go through the motions and attend training when you please then f**k off and play for Mitchell Park we do not need ya..." - Prominent Member of the Kenilworth FC, 2009
Will be pinned up in the changerooms of the Mitchell Park lads for the first game against Kenilworth. Quite a few Parky lads will be looking forward to that battle.
There we go, that should spice things up a bit....
I can't see any problem with that, you were in a lower division than them at the time and you are the closest club to them, it would make sense. If you need literature to motivate you to perform at your optimum level you are already behind the 8-ball, the Plympton/ Rosewater thing is a different kettle of fish though.
We all know how wonderful Kenilworth are, with all their recent success and all...
Probably just less disciplined on the field maybe..... ??
I am only assuming thats what you meant, as anyone who read Issue 55 of this year’s SAAFL news would realise that Mitchell Park are nowhere near as bad as the purported “thug” myth that surrounds them.
Teams with worse disciple records (exceeded league average for reports and suspensions) over the past 5 years than Mitchell Park;
Brahma Lodge
Eastern Park
Rosewater
Salisbury West
Smithfield
I ponder if someone posted on these forums with one of these clubs in their avatar if you would say the same thing? But I think we both know the answer to that ...
