by locky801 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 12:42 pm
by bloods08 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:17 pm
by MAY-Z » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:20 pm
bloods08 wrote:Well done redbacks. I find the Pattinson/McKay thing ridiculous. You cant replace an injured player during a match so why should this be any different.
by MAY-Z » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:21 pm
jackpot jim wrote:Lunch S.A. 2/191 Harris 84 Bailey 36
Great fighting spirit shown by these two. 2 sessions to go.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:32 pm
bloods08 wrote:Well done redbacks. I find the Pattinson/McKay thing ridiculous. You cant replace an injured player during a match so why should this be any different.
by valleys07 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:40 pm
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:41 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:bloods08 wrote:Well done redbacks. I find the Pattinson/McKay thing ridiculous. You cant replace an injured player during a match so why should this be any different.
Happens at all levels of cricket.
Players getting a call up to SA can be replaced in grade cricket.
Don't see what the drama is.
by bloods08 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:44 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:bloods08 wrote:Well done redbacks. I find the Pattinson/McKay thing ridiculous. You cant replace an injured player during a match so why should this be any different.
Happens at all levels of cricket.
Players getting a call up to SA can be replaced in grade cricket.
Don't see what the drama is.
by bloods08 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:48 pm
valleys07 wrote:Bailey notches his 50, fine effort for the bloke, need him to hang around for as long as possible
by mal » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:52 pm
bloods08 wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:bloods08 wrote:Well done redbacks. I find the Pattinson/McKay thing ridiculous. You cant replace an injured player during a match so why should this be any different.
Happens at all levels of cricket.
Players getting a call up to SA can be replaced in grade cricket.
Don't see what the drama is.
Fair point. I just dont think it is fair to bring in someone who was not in the 12 man squad originally. If he was the 12th man then I dont have a problem with it but he wasnt. Anyway it isnt helping them so thats a good thing.
by valleys07 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:52 pm
bloods08 wrote:valleys07 wrote:Bailey notches his 50, fine effort for the bloke, need him to hang around for as long as possible
Great to see him improve so much since the first time I saw him bat. Barely knew which end of the bat to hold. Now if only he could just improve his bowling a bit and he could be a genuine all-rounder.
by locky801 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:14 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:33 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:47 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:02 pm
by magpie in the 80's » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:04 pm
valleys07 wrote:bails now 84*, anyone know his highest district score?
by locky801 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:20 pm
by shoe boy » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:26 pm
valleys07 wrote:Who do you put as man of the match if harris bats all the way through? look at the attack hodge faced in comparison to harris, if harris makes 150+* id have him as man of match
by valleys07 » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:31 pm
shoe boy wrote:valleys07 wrote:Who do you put as man of the match if harris bats all the way through? look at the attack hodge faced in comparison to harris, if harris makes 150+* id have him as man of match
You are kidding are you???? WE LOST!!!
MOM Hodge
by magpie in the 80's » Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:36 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |