birdmanptr wrote:dogs01 wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:dogs01 wrote:How can you end the dominance of a club that is bigger than any other club in the comp.
The dogs will eventually miss out on making a GF which is just reality, but with the structures in place at elizabeth you would think that they would make the finals almost every year thus giving them a good chance to make a GF .
Look back to 06 when we lost some of the best players in the clubs history, we still made the GF. Even though we lost that GF we still got through the year with almost a whole new list of players and a whole heap of injuries.
So the teams dominance may take a dent every now and then but i cant see the clubs dominance ever ending, reallistically it can only get stronger, and if the other 8 clubs dont get a wriggle on they may be left behind.
A lot of Port supporters felt this way about 10 - 15 years ago.
While I don't see the Dogs missing the finals for a few years yet, it will happen eventually... Nothing lasts forever...
True, but ports dominance was destroyed by the power. As soon as the power joined the AFL the magpies were kicked out and sent to a tin shed at ethelton.
The facilities at elizabeth can only get better which is my point.
Lets take a look at the other 9 clubs and how far off they are from CDFC
GLENELG 18s top ressies top so depth wise not to far hopefully pick up a couple of recuits BUT we have a mental problem with CDFC and finals
STURT Further away than we think great effort to get the GF but game was done and dusted by quarter time and Central never got out of second gearEAGLES Interesting new coach could have easily been in a Prelim Ressies should have won the flag they will be around the mark again
NORTH On the up no doubt but still a long way off
NORWOOD New coach heading in the right direction slow steps however
PORT.WA. SOUTH Long way off will have no impact for a while
So barring injuries or a AFL liecence its not a case of who can win the flag but who will pick it up when the Dogs drop it
I have to strongly disagree with your assessment of Sturt there mate.
I see a tremendous amount of upside to the SFC over the next few years. I think it's fair to say most pundits and supporters would agree, given the amount of youth in the Sturt side, they did indeed do very well to make the GF, particularly after being written off after so many experienced players left/retired at the end of 2008.
Some reasons why the Double Blues WILL be a force in the coming season and beyond:
- The aforementioned fact that Sturt's list, in the main, comprised of a lot of young talent.
- The side made the GF despite having to restructure their leading scoring avenue and without the dominant forward in the competition.
- Our reserves were top or second all season even after coping with losing some very important players mid-year (Thring, Hurley, Farmer, Rischbieth). The side came within a point of the eventual Premiers Glenelg in the 2nd Semi-Final. Sturt reserves won the flag in 2008.
- Our U/18's came within a kick of beating the eventual Premiers Glenelg in the qualifying final. Sturt U/17's won the flag in 2008.
- Sturt were runners up in the Stanley H. Lewis and as such were the second best performed club in the SANFL. Sturt won this award in 2008.
These are not factors one would associate with a club on the way down.......
I think you need to do a little more research before you start sprouting opinions on here.
With the club likely to turn a profit this year for the first time in a long while, and the prospect of some big names to bolster key positions coming to the club in 2010, I can only see Sturt maintaining their place as one of the top two or three clubs in the competition in the medium to long term.