pantherfromwayback wrote:NFC wrote:After no one took the hint, how was COOK?!
Sorry, still trying to workout who is the worst coach - Sampson, Ginever or whoever Norwood choose!!
Ha ha.

by NFC » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:53 pm
pantherfromwayback wrote:NFC wrote:After no one took the hint, how was COOK?!
Sorry, still trying to workout who is the worst coach - Sampson, Ginever or whoever Norwood choose!!
by pantherfromwayback » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:00 pm
NFC wrote:pantherfromwayback wrote:NFC wrote:After no one took the hint, how was COOK?!
Sorry, still trying to workout who is the worst coach - Sampson, Ginever or whoever Norwood choose!!
Ha ha.
Now were you at the game? If so, answer me up mate.
by panthers 2008 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:11 pm
by southee » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:12 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Great to see South record their second win...
Great to see Southee writing something positive for a change...
by Cambridge Clarrie » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:14 pm
southee wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Great to see South record their second win...
Great to see Southee writing something positive for a change...
Not much really to be positive about this year....
....but tonight is great for a nice change Clarrie
by saintal » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:21 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:46 pm
saintal wrote:It's been a looong time coming, but you couldn't have scripted it any better![]()
Port used the footy far better in the first half, South, despite having more than their fair share of F50 entries just could not hit a target. Port ran hard forward, always seeming to have a loose man through half forward. South did absolutely nothing with the breeze in the second quarter. 1.5 to 6.4 at the half.
South opened brightly after the long break but Port managed to keep a 4 to 5 goal lead for most of the quarter. Port's final goal of the quarter came from a shocking South turnover in the back half. But South were running the harder, and a couple of late goals had the heads up at the final change.
The final Q was a beauty, South managing to regularly force the ball forward despite Micklejohn's dominance in ruck, Warren seemingly on the end of everything, the skill level lifted 100%, and like Port in the first half, it seemed as though we always had an extra body or two at the contest, particular in our forward line. Port went missing, but still managed to have a couple of opportunities late to pinch it.
Great result for the club, the players, the retiring skipper, the coach and us poor bastards that have sat through 5 winless months.![]()
![]()
Better players in no real order: Lyon, Warren, Crabb, Farmer, Sandery, Cockshell, Torney, with a mention to young Murphy who i liked the look of. NFC..cooky started well, finished well, but didn't do much in between.
Lastly, the umpiring was absolutely appalling, and i'm just thankful we got the points despite it. :evil:
by Dutchy » Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:50 pm
by prowling panther » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:30 am
NO-MERCY wrote:saintal wrote:It's been a looong time coming, but you couldn't have scripted it any better![]()
Port used the footy far better in the first half, South, despite having more than their fair share of F50 entries just could not hit a target. Port ran hard forward, always seeming to have a loose man through half forward. South did absolutely nothing with the breeze in the second quarter. 1.5 to 6.4 at the half.
South opened brightly after the long break but Port managed to keep a 4 to 5 goal lead for most of the quarter. Port's final goal of the quarter came from a shocking South turnover in the back half. But South were running the harder, and a couple of late goals had the heads up at the final change.
The final Q was a beauty, South managing to regularly force the ball forward despite Micklejohn's dominance in ruck, Warren seemingly on the end of everything, the skill level lifted 100%, and like Port in the first half, it seemed as though we always had an extra body or two at the contest, particular in our forward line. Port went missing, but still managed to have a couple of opportunities late to pinch it.
Great result for the club, the players, the retiring skipper, the coach and us poor bastards that have sat through 5 winless months.![]()
![]()
Better players in no real order: Lyon, Warren, Crabb, Farmer, Sandery, Cockshell, Torney, with a mention to young Murphy who i liked the look of. NFC..cooky started well, finished well, but didn't do much in between.
Lastly, the umpiring was absolutely appalling, and i'm just thankful we got the points despite it. :evil:
Some people were telling me Port got a rough deal by the maggots.
by prowling panther » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:36 am
by dedja » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:57 am
by scott » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:07 am
NO-MERCY wrote:saintal wrote:It's been a looong time coming, but you couldn't have scripted it any better![]()
Port used the footy far better in the first half, South, despite having more than their fair share of F50 entries just could not hit a target. Port ran hard forward, always seeming to have a loose man through half forward. South did absolutely nothing with the breeze in the second quarter. 1.5 to 6.4 at the half.
South opened brightly after the long break but Port managed to keep a 4 to 5 goal lead for most of the quarter. Port's final goal of the quarter came from a shocking South turnover in the back half. But South were running the harder, and a couple of late goals had the heads up at the final change.
The final Q was a beauty, South managing to regularly force the ball forward despite Micklejohn's dominance in ruck, Warren seemingly on the end of everything, the skill level lifted 100%, and like Port in the first half, it seemed as though we always had an extra body or two at the contest, particular in our forward line. Port went missing, but still managed to have a couple of opportunities late to pinch it.
Great result for the club, the players, the retiring skipper, the coach and us poor bastards that have sat through 5 winless months.![]()
![]()
Better players in no real order: Lyon, Warren, Crabb, Farmer, Sandery, Cockshell, Torney, with a mention to young Murphy who i liked the look of. NFC..cooky started well, finished well, but didn't do much in between.
Lastly, the umpiring was absolutely appalling, and i'm just thankful we got the points despite it. :evil:
Some people were telling me Port got a rough deal by the maggots.
by scott » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:19 am
by Choccies » Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:25 am
by darley16 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:03 am
by PhilH » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:05 pm
by scott » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:08 pm
by phantom57 » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:58 pm
by drebin » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:04 pm
PhilH wrote:Just a note on the Noarlunga crowd as well.
The turnup of 2153 yesterday made it
- A total over the 10 home games of 20,025 .. the first time the club has broken the 20,000 home game barrier since moving all home games there in 1996.
- The 4th successive season that the Panthers have recorded an increase in home game attendances,
2003 - 1505 per home game
2004 - 1656 per home game
2005 - 1530 per home game
2006 - 1768 per home game
2007 - 1901 per home game
2008 - 1931 per home game
2009 - 2003 per gome game
Given the general lack of wins 4 straight years of increases is an excellent effort.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |