Which coaching job is more attractive?

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Which coaching job is more attractive.....?

Poll ended at Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:51 pm

Norwood
7
18%
Eagles
22
56%
Port
7
18%
South
3
8%
 
Total votes : 39

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby Thiele » Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pm

Eagles for me
James Ezard Joint 2009 Magarey Medalist

Personal views only not views of the West Adelaide Footy Club or Bedford Indstries
User avatar
Thiele
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28406
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: The wolf packs den
Has liked: 183 times
Been liked: 118 times

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby Wedgie » Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:39 pm

Booney wrote:Go on then, make a decent case which would make me want to apply for the Norwood job... :lol:


3 words

Coopers Pale Ale
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby aceman » Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:03 pm

The Norwood job would be the most appealing for me.
The zone they've got and the amount of kids that are developing within the clubs in their zone will set them up for years to come if they are managed correctly. I reckon this next appointment at Norwood will be the most important one they've had since Alan Killigrew.
If they don't get premierships out of their next 6-10 years, they will have failed miserably.
Always behind the 8 ball
User avatar
aceman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby Aerie » Wed Aug 12, 2009 9:27 pm

aceman wrote:If they don't get premierships out of their next 6-10 years, they will have failed miserably.


The same could be said for every club could it not?
User avatar
Aerie
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5750
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 1:05 am
Has liked: 186 times
Been liked: 590 times

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby JK » Wed Aug 12, 2009 11:11 pm

aceman wrote:The Norwood job would be the most appealing for me.
The zone they've got and the amount of kids that are developing within the clubs in their zone will set them up for years to come if they are managed correctly. I reckon this next appointment at Norwood will be the most important one they've had since Alan Killigrew.
If they don't get premierships out of their next 6-10 years, they will have failed miserably.


As a Norwood fan Im inclined to agree with you, obviously with a fair degree of bias ... Why the relevance to Killigrew though? (genuine question, I dont go back that far)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby cje » Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:58 am

i would take the south job you couldnt go any lower than what they are at now,it would be challenging but that describes my current job.
cje
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 6:17 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby Booney » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:44 am

Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:Go on then, make a decent case which would make me want to apply for the Norwood job... :lol:


3 words

Coopers Pale Ale


Got me! Where do I apply? :lol:
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61831
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8231 times
Been liked: 11966 times

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby Wedgie » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:46 am

Booney wrote:
Wedgie wrote:
Booney wrote:Go on then, make a decent case which would make me want to apply for the Norwood job... :lol:


3 words

Coopers Pale Ale


Got me! Where do I apply? :lol:


Stay away its mine, no money involved but a contract for free beer for a year.
At least I know I wont be sacked as I'll be dead by May! :lol:
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby aceman » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:47 am

Constance_Perm wrote:
aceman wrote:The Norwood job would be the most appealing for me.
The zone they've got and the amount of kids that are developing within the clubs in their zone will set them up for years to come if they are managed correctly. I reckon this next appointment at Norwood will be the most important one they've had since Alan Killigrew.
If they don't get premierships out of their next 6-10 years, they will have failed miserably.


As a Norwood fan Im inclined to agree with you, obviously with a fair degree of bias ... Why the relevance to Killigrew though? (genuine question, I dont go back that far)



Killigrew came into the club without any preconceived ideas or past knowledge of internal politics. He told the club what he was going to do and the "political correctness" crap wasn't around so when he said something, he meant it and it got done. No 'if's and buts', just action.
Too many clubs nowadays want to appoint someone from within but that most times is frought with danger and leads to issues from within. At least an outside perspective can bring a club some balance, albeit sometimes for only a short time.
Always behind the 8 ball
User avatar
aceman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5481
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: At home by the fire with Rupert at my feet.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Which coaching job is more attractive?

Postby JK » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:53 am

aceman wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:
aceman wrote:The Norwood job would be the most appealing for me.
The zone they've got and the amount of kids that are developing within the clubs in their zone will set them up for years to come if they are managed correctly. I reckon this next appointment at Norwood will be the most important one they've had since Alan Killigrew.
If they don't get premierships out of their next 6-10 years, they will have failed miserably.


As a Norwood fan Im inclined to agree with you, obviously with a fair degree of bias ... Why the relevance to Killigrew though? (genuine question, I dont go back that far)



Killigrew came into the club without any preconceived ideas or past knowledge of internal politics. He told the club what he was going to do and the "political correctness" crap wasn't around so when he said something, he meant it and it got done. No 'if's and buts', just action.
Too many clubs nowadays want to appoint someone from within but that most times is frought with danger and leads to issues from within. At least an outside perspective can bring a club some balance, albeit sometimes for only a short time.


Cheers mate, seems Killa was a very polarising character, many people speak very highly of him and many others speak quite the opposite.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Previous

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |