clear cut wrote:Honestly, you two look like a couple of old bitter men arguing over who team is better - my team does this and my team does that! Pretty amusing actually, makes for some good humerous reading.![]()
The association should have just left it as it was, there was no problem with the old system - you can't fix something that's not broken.![]()
Talk about power hungry - "there's no rule there... hmmm, we can't have that, let make up some bulls**t one!"![]()
Haha, wonder who going to have a go at me first!?
CC, It's not a case of which team or club is better than any other. I've played with Flinders, Wanderers and Panthers and all three clubs have some some great people involved with them. I'm just not sure what Wanderers have done wrong to be acused of being selfish and only thinking of ourselves? We will sign players every week to ensure games are played not forfited. This position has been consistant in Womans and Mens. Every other club has refused to sign players at some level atleast once in either Mens or Womans. Come finals time we want to win and we will not sign anyone for clubs who have had a full season to organise a team in all grades for those three weeks. Pritty simple, logical and fair I would have thought. I don't even know who this "block" is. As for the associtation creating a rule for this situation. If your going to have a rule.........make it a good rule. This one isn't a good one.