RD13 Port v North Game Review

All discussions to do with the SANFL

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:02 am

Interesting to see that Kirkwood tagged Allen after 1/4 time and was given 2nd best for Port and Allen was given best for North??

Backline was fantastic for Port. Trengrove was outstanding as was Thurgood.
Sam Mardling is starting to really show some form.

Brad Murray must have had 10 clearances out of the middle, and he would be a genuine Magarey chance if Port had won more games.

Umpiring was disgraceful all day. North got everything in that first quarter, but it was pretty even after that.

3 wins for Port for the second week in a row.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby JK » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:07 am

gerling182 wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:How did McInerney go today?


Was pretty good without starring, tucked the ball under the arm and went for a couple of nice runs along the outer wing.


Thanks mate ... I was ultra impressed with what I saw of him the week before and IMHO is definitely one to keep an eye on.
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:11 am

Constance_Perm wrote:
gerling182 wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:How did McInerney go today?


Was pretty good without starring, tucked the ball under the arm and went for a couple of nice runs along the outer wing.


Thanks mate ... I was ultra impressed with what I saw of him the week before and IMHO is definitely one to keep an eye on.


He is going to be a very good player for a number of years. Took a while to break into the league side (i thought he should have been given a go earlier) but has done really well since given a go. I know Timmy loves him.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby JK » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:24 am

Slots It Through wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:
gerling182 wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:How did McInerney go today?


Was pretty good without starring, tucked the ball under the arm and went for a couple of nice runs along the outer wing.


Thanks mate ... I was ultra impressed with what I saw of him the week before and IMHO is definitely one to keep an eye on.


He is going to be a very good player for a number of years. Took a while to break into the league side (i thought he should have been given a go earlier) but has done really well since given a go. I know Timmy loves him.


How old is he mate? He's obviously a product of your junior system?
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:35 am

I am not 100% on his age, but he's prob 20 or turning 20.

Yeah he came through the juniors. The good signs for Port yesterday were that he played well, as did Kirkwood and Mardling. All younger blokes that have come through the system...

In the reserves Matt Rose was best on ground, in his first game of reserves footy, after playing in the U18 comp, so there are some good kids coming through.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Macca19 » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:45 am

Yeah Macca is a gun. Hes 20, won the U19s BnF 2 years back, Played U18 state footy a couple years back and was one of the stars of the U19s premiership sides. Had a good grounding in the ressies last year and has played some great footy in the league side this year. Hes the sort of player in my opinion that could be a future leader.
Macca19
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1961
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:54 pm
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 10 times
Grassroots Team: Ports

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby JK » Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:06 pm

Macca19 wrote:Yeah Macca is a gun. Hes 20, won the U19s BnF 2 years back, Played U18 state footy a couple years back and was one of the stars of the U19s premiership sides. Had a good grounding in the ressies last year and has played some great footy in the league side this year. Hes the sort of player in my opinion that could be a future leader.


From the only time I saw him he appeared to run in straight lines with plenty of toe and used the ball well ... Looks a bright prospect for sure
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37457
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4480 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby 71/72 » Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:46 pm

beenreal wrote:And once again, for the second week in a row, the League side won, the Reserves won. And the Port Adelaide U18s beat North by 20 GOALS!

Which club has the brighter future?

North Adelaide.
71/72
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:29 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:06 pm

71/72 wrote:
beenreal wrote:And once again, for the second week in a row, the League side won, the Reserves won. And the Port Adelaide U18s beat North by 20 GOALS!

Which club has the brighter future?

North Adelaide.


Yep, who cares about U18s results? All the good kids will be snapped up in the AFL draft, so no clubs will really benefit.
User avatar
Adelaide Hawk
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:52 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby GWW » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:15 pm

McInerney i think is from Whyalla. Certainly has been impressive since making his debut.
User avatar
GWW
Moderator
 
Posts: 15680
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:50 pm
Location: Eastern suburbs of Adelaide
Has liked: 817 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby NO-MERCY » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:28 pm

rod_rooster wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:I thought North had 20 on the ground for most of the day!
Port done a great job beating Norths 18 on the ground plus the 2 other maggots! :lol:


Can't argue with that too much. First quarter North easily had the better of the umpiring. After that it evened out but at the end of the day Port deserved to win and did. Port have had their fair share of umpiring help over the years though particularly a number 11 who was never able to make the step up to the next level.


Thats a cracker rod_rooster, if that bloke was given the free's he deserved he would of kicked 200 in a year! :lol:
As for AFL atleast he had a crack rod, if its the bloke i think your talking about 38 games & 100 goals at the Crows, i wouldn't say he never made the step up. :roll:
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby drebin » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:54 pm

NO-MERCY wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
NO-MERCY wrote:I thought North had 20 on the ground for most of the day!
Port done a great job beating Norths 18 on the ground plus the 2 other maggots! :lol:


Can't argue with that too much. First quarter North easily had the better of the umpiring. After that it evened out but at the end of the day Port deserved to win and did. Port have had their fair share of umpiring help over the years though particularly a number 11 who was never able to make the step up to the next level.


Thats a cracker rod_rooster, if that bloke was given the free's he deserved he would of kicked 200 in a year! :lol:
As for AFL atleast he had a crack rod, if its the bloke i think your talking about 38 games & 100 goals at the Crows, i wouldn't say he never made the step up. :roll:


Hmm wonder why your so protective of that bloke who wore number 11? :roll:
drebin
 

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Punk Rooster » Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:15 am

Slots It Through wrote:Umpiring was disgraceful all day. North got everything in that first quarter, but it was pretty even after that.

well surely the umpiring was only disgraceful in the first quarter then?

I hate seeing players take on the tackler, get tackled, the ball spills free, & the umpire calls play on, whilst a bloke will take possession of the ball, have limited opportunity to get rid of it, yet gets pinged...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:04 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
Slots It Through wrote:Umpiring was disgraceful all day. North got everything in that first quarter, but it was pretty even after that.

well surely the umpiring was only disgraceful in the first quarter then?

I hate seeing players take on the tackler, get tackled, the ball spills free, & the umpire calls play on, whilst a bloke will take possession of the ball, have limited opportunity to get rid of it, yet gets pinged...

So you have an issue with the rules not the umpiring then?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:32 am

Punk Rooster wrote:
Slots It Through wrote:Umpiring was disgraceful all day. North got everything in that first quarter, but it was pretty even after that.

well surely the umpiring was only disgraceful in the first quarter then?

I hate seeing players take on the tackler, get tackled, the ball spills free, & the umpire calls play on, whilst a bloke will take possession of the ball, have limited opportunity to get rid of it, yet gets pinged...


No i thought the umpiring was disgraceful all day. North got everything in the first quarter, but after that it was still disgraceful, it just went both ways.
North were pinged a 25m penalty for handballing the ball in the air too high when giving the ball back. It was rediculous, it happens 50 times a game.
The free kick against Hall in the last quarter when it was a 50/50 contest was a very poor decision.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby beenreal » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:37 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
71/72 wrote:
beenreal wrote:And once again, for the second week in a row, the League side won, the Reserves won. And the Port Adelaide U18s beat North by 20 GOALS!

Which club has the brighter future?

North Adelaide.


Yep, who cares about U18s results? All the good kids will be snapped up in the AFL draft, so no clubs will really benefit.


All of them hey? Gee that's a lot of vacancies on AFL lists.

And we generally find that the clubs that don't care about their juniors are the ones that don't put a lot of effort into it.
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:43 am

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
71/72 wrote:
beenreal wrote:And once again, for the second week in a row, the League side won, the Reserves won. And the Port Adelaide U18s beat North by 20 GOALS!

Which club has the brighter future?

North Adelaide.


Yep, who cares about U18s results? All the good kids will be snapped up in the AFL draft, so no clubs will really benefit.


When the kids are drafted into the AFL the clubs do benefit - financially.

Not all the good juniors will get drafted some will go on to play alot of SANFL footy. With your attitude why do North worry about having U18s.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Wedgie » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:07 am

Slots It Through wrote:
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
71/72 wrote:
beenreal wrote:And once again, for the second week in a row, the League side won, the Reserves won. And the Port Adelaide U18s beat North by 20 GOALS!

Which club has the brighter future?

North Adelaide.


Yep, who cares about U18s results? All the good kids will be snapped up in the AFL draft, so no clubs will really benefit.


When the kids are drafted into the AFL the clubs do benefit - financially.

Not all the good juniors will get drafted some will go on to play alot of SANFL footy. With your attitude why do North worry about having U18s.

North use it to play kids under 18 that arent good enough for senior football. Other clubs use it differently, so be it hence the current results.
Even if they did use it the same I think you'll find North's junior team result in the last 5 years would be one of the best.
From memory we've won more underage flags than Port in th last 4 years, had 2 more reserves flags, play more senior finals and have successful financial revenues and in the last year had 6 kids drafted to Port's 1.
To claim that Port has a brighter future based on one or two weeks of results is ridiculously ignorant especially when you're comparing apples with oranges (17 year olds playing reserves at one club with 18 year olds playing Under 18s at the other).
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby Slots It Through » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:26 am

The SANFL created the U18s and wanted it to be an elite competition, hence the Centre of Excellence.

North decided to do there own thing and have decided to play the capable kids in the reserves before the SANFL requested date.

North are one of the clubs making a mockery of the U18 cpmpetition.
Slots It Through
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:27 am
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: Portland

Re: RD13 Port v North Game Review

Postby beenreal » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:33 am

Wedgie wrote:North use it to play kids under 18 that arent good enough for senior football. Other clubs use it differently, so be it hence the current results.
Even if they did use it the same I think you'll find North's junior team result in the last 5 years would be one of the best.
From memory we've won more underage flags than Port in th last 4 years, had 2 more reserves flags, play more senior finals and have successful financial revenues and in the last year had 6 kids drafted to Port's 1.
To claim that Port has a brighter future based on one or two weeks of results is ridiculously ignorant.


I claim Port Adelaide has a bright future based on a consistent season of winning. The U18, Centre of Excellence has been winning by an average margin of 15-20 goals almost every week.

In addition, approximately 80% of the Reserves side have come through that very program.

And in addition to that, about half of the League side have also come through that program.

I distinctly remember your carry on after the last Port Vs North game Wedgie. How the world turns. ;)
PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB
Serving the community since 1870
Developing footballers for 143 years
Proud of the Past, Confident of the Future
User avatar
beenreal
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:57 am
Location: Port Adelaide
Has liked: 24 times
Been liked: 11 times
Grassroots Team: Seaton Ramblers

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jo172 and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |